Search

First Responders File Suit Against Texas Chemical Company

Posted on 9/11/2017 by Roger Marks

“Our employees acted in the same honorable and heroic way that thousands of other citizens in Harris County did when confronted with an unprecedented tragedy. They did everything they could to protect the public, while fighting fast-rising flood waters that were 5 to 7 feet high at our plant. We totally cooperated with all first responders and the numerous regulatory agencies working with us to keep the public safe.”

-Chemical facility spokesperson
 
Seven individuals who responded to the flooded Arkema organic peroxides plant in Crosby, TX during Hurricane Harvey have now filed suit against the company.

The suit alleges that Arkema failed to take steps to better prepare for the type of catastrophic flooding that occurred in the week following Harvey’s landfall in the Houston area. When, on August 31, organic peroxide containers began “exploding” due to the failure of back-up refrigeration, police officers and other first responders fell ill immediately.

From the lawsuit:

“The scene was nothing less than chaos. Police officers were doubled over vomiting, unable to breath. Medical personnel, in their attempts to provide assistance to officers, became overwhelmed and they too began to vomit and gasp for air.”

The suit goes on to allege that the owner of the chemical plant displayed negligence in the following ways:
  • Failure to properly store chemicals
  • Failure to have proper procedures for backup refrigeration of chemicals
  • Failure to have adequate procedures in place to protect the safety and welfare of the community in the event of a catastrophe
  • Failure to provide the public and first responders accurate information on the chemicals at risk of exploding
  • Failure to implement company- and government-mandated procedures for handling chemicals
  • Failure to adequately prepare for a major flood event, having had the knowledge that such an event was foreseeable


Preparing for Chemical Industry Nightmare Scenarios
Chemical facilities in the US are subject to stringent reporting and recordkeeping requirements under various environmental programs—the Clean Air Act, EPCRA, CERCLA, TSCA, and others. Under the Clean Air Act Risk Management Plan (RMP) requirements, for example, facilities that use large volumes of flammable or toxic substances must submit a written, certified risk management plan to US EPA. This plan must include plans for a “worst-case scenario” as well as prevention and emergency response details.

Earlier this year, US EPA delayed the implementation of new, more stringent Clean Air Act RMP requirements finalized in late 2016. 


Houston Hazmat Training—October 2—5

Winner-Logo-Best-of-2017-Industry-Insights.jpgStill time to register! Expert-led, award-winning hazmat shipper training comes to Houston next month.

Sign up now to meet your initial or recurrent hazmat training mandates. You will build on your DG expertise, earn CEUs, and network with other shipping professionals who know the challenges you face. Plus, take home industry-leading resources that make it easier to navigate and comply with the 49 CFR, IATA DGR, and IMDG Code regulations that impact your shipments. 

Tags: Act, Air, Clean, emergency preparedness, EPA, hazardous chemicals, RMP

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

No comparison. Lion has the best RCRA training ever!!

Matt Sabine

Environmental Specialist

Lion courses are the standard to which all other workshops should strive for!

Brody Saleen

Registered Environmental Health Specialist

Attending Lion Technology classes should be mandatory for every facility that ships or stores hazmat.

Genell Drake

Outbound Lead

The instructor was energetic and made learning fun compared to dry instructors from other training providers.

Andy D’Amato

International Trade Compliance Manager

Lion's course was superior to others I have taken in the past. Very clear in the presentation and the examples helped to explain the content presented.

George Bersik

Hazardous Waste Professional

Course instructor was better prepared and presented better than other trainers. Course manual and references were easier to use as well.

Marty Brownfield

Hazardous Waste Professional

More thorough than a class I attended last year through another company.

Troy Yonkers

HSES Representative

The instructor did an excellent job presenting a very dry subject; keeping everyone interested and making it enjoyable.

Marc Bugg

Hazardous Waste Professional

Excellent job. Made what is very dry material interesting. Thoroughly explained all topics in easy-to-understand terms.

David Hertvik

Vice President

We have a very busy work schedule and using Lion enables us to take the course at our own time. It makes it easy for me to schedule my employees' training.

Timothy Mertes

Hazmat Shipping Professional

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Hazardous materials shipment rejections bear a big cost. Use this guide to end operational and logistical disruptions that severely impact your bottom line.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.