EPA Enforcement Roundup: Week of 5/1
In this week’s EPA Enforcement Roundup, a midstream natural gas firm, an eyeglass lens manufacturer, and a packaging company face fines for noncompliance with EPA air, water, and chemical regulations.
Have you seen recent EPA enforcement actions your colleagues can learn from? Post them on Lion’s Facebook page here. Be sure to like our page so you never miss an update about DOT hazmat, hazardous waste, OSHA workplace safety, and EPA compliance.
All accusations of environmental violations herein are “alleged” unless otherwise noted. Lion News does not publish names of individuals or companies impacted by EPA enforcement.
A firm that gathers, processes, and transports natural gas will pay a $610,000 civil penalty and spend $2.6 million on facility upgrades to settle alleged violations of the Clean Air Act.
The 2018 nationwide schedule for the Complete Environmental Regulations Workshop is now available. Collaborate with other managers to identify the requirements that apply to your facility, ask the right questions, and make the right decisions about EPA compliance.
According to EPA, the company failed to obtain the proper permits or keep proper records pursuant to volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from facility maintenance activities. The emissions occurred while using devices called “pipe inspection gauges,” or “pigs” to remove debris from and push liquid through a pipeline. To use “pigs,” employees must depressurize and vent equipment, releasing emissions.
The Consent Decree states that this is “the first civil enforcement action brought by the United States… concerning emissions from natural gas pig launchers and receivers at compressor stations or at stand-alone facilities.”
WHO: An eyeglasses lens manufacturer
For repeatedly discharging untreated wastewaters containing metal alloys, potassium hydroxide, and other regulated hazardous substances to a wastewater treatment plant, an eyeglass lens maker will pay a $750,000 criminal fine for Clean Water Act violations.
A Federal Judge ordered the company to pay after US EPA and the Department of Justice showed that the company misrepresented the characteristics of its wastewater on a CWA-required industrial user survey distributed by the treatment plant. By ignoring its compliance responsibilities, the company was able to save nearly $400,000 on proper disposal costs, DOJ says.
There’s “empty” and then there’s “RCRA-empty.” This distinction may have tripped up a packaging company in Bristol, TN, that allegedly released hazardous waste drums containing residue of ink wastes to a hauler not equipped to dispose of them properly. According to the Herald Courier, the hauler kept the drums on various properties and in abandoned houses not authorized for hazmat storage.
It’s worth noting that when regulators inspected the packaging company’s warehouse on February 14, 2018, they did not record a single violation of hazardous waste requirements, according to records.
.jpg.aspx?width=298&height=194 "computer-(1).jpg")
Managing site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERLCA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field or need an update on changing EPA rules, the Complete Environmental Regulations Online Course will help you quickly build in-depth expertise.
JOIN US LIVE! The 2018 nationwide schedule for the Complete Environmental Regulations Workshop is now available. Collaborate with other managers to identify the requirements that apply to your facility, ask the right questions, and make the right decisions about EPA compliance.
Have you seen recent EPA enforcement actions your colleagues can learn from? Post them on Lion’s Facebook page here. Be sure to like our page so you never miss an update about DOT hazmat, hazardous waste, OSHA workplace safety, and EPA compliance.
All accusations of environmental violations herein are “alleged” unless otherwise noted. Lion News does not publish names of individuals or companies impacted by EPA enforcement.
WHO: A midstream natural gas company
WHERE: East OH and West PA
WHAT: Alleged Clean Air Act violations
HOW MUCH: About $3 million
A firm that gathers, processes, and transports natural gas will pay a $610,000 civil penalty and spend $2.6 million on facility upgrades to settle alleged violations of the Clean Air Act.The 2018 nationwide schedule for the Complete Environmental Regulations Workshop is now available. Collaborate with other managers to identify the requirements that apply to your facility, ask the right questions, and make the right decisions about EPA compliance.
According to EPA, the company failed to obtain the proper permits or keep proper records pursuant to volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from facility maintenance activities. The emissions occurred while using devices called “pipe inspection gauges,” or “pigs” to remove debris from and push liquid through a pipeline. To use “pigs,” employees must depressurize and vent equipment, releasing emissions.
The Consent Decree states that this is “the first civil enforcement action brought by the United States… concerning emissions from natural gas pig launchers and receivers at compressor stations or at stand-alone facilities.”
WHO: An eyeglasses lens manufacturer
WHERE: Clackamas, OR
WHAT: Illegal hazardous waste water discharge
HOW MUCH: $750,000
For repeatedly discharging untreated wastewaters containing metal alloys, potassium hydroxide, and other regulated hazardous substances to a wastewater treatment plant, an eyeglass lens maker will pay a $750,000 criminal fine for Clean Water Act violations.A Federal Judge ordered the company to pay after US EPA and the Department of Justice showed that the company misrepresented the characteristics of its wastewater on a CWA-required industrial user survey distributed by the treatment plant. By ignoring its compliance responsibilities, the company was able to save nearly $400,000 on proper disposal costs, DOJ says.
WHO: A packaging company
WHERE: Bristol, TN
WHAT: Improper disposal of waste residues
HOW MUCH: $60,000
There’s “empty” and then there’s “RCRA-empty.” This distinction may have tripped up a packaging company in Bristol, TN, that allegedly released hazardous waste drums containing residue of ink wastes to a hauler not equipped to dispose of them properly. According to the Herald Courier, the hauler kept the drums on various properties and in abandoned houses not authorized for hazmat storage.It’s worth noting that when regulators inspected the packaging company’s warehouse on February 14, 2018, they did not record a single violation of hazardous waste requirements, according to records.
20+ Hours of EH&S Manager Training - Available Anytime, Anywhere
Managing site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERLCA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field or need an update on changing EPA rules, the Complete Environmental Regulations Online Course will help you quickly build in-depth expertise.JOIN US LIVE! The 2018 nationwide schedule for the Complete Environmental Regulations Workshop is now available. Collaborate with other managers to identify the requirements that apply to your facility, ask the right questions, and make the right decisions about EPA compliance.
Tags: Act, Air, Clean, EPA, EPA Enforcement Roundup, fines and penalties, hazardous waste, RCRA
Find a Post
Recent Posts
Compliance Archives
Download Our Latest Whitepaper
Get to know the top 5 changes to OSHA’s revised GHS Hazard Communication Standard at 29 CFR 1910.1200 and how the updates impacts employee safety at your facility.
By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.