EPA’s New Methane Emissions Rules for Oil and Gas
The newly proposed methane rules will amend the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for the oil and gas industry. The NSPS apply to new, modified, and reconstructed “facilities,” meaning any piece of equipment that can emit Clean Air Act-regulated chemicals.
Three Major Elements of EPA’s New Methane Rule
EPA proposal includes three major elements.
1. Expanding the range of emission sources covered under NSPS to include hydraulically fractured oil well completions, fugitive emission from well sites and compressor stations, pneumatic pumps, and other sources not covered by existing requirements.
2. Updating EPA’s 2012 NSPS to address methane and VOC emissions from sources covered by that rule.
3. Expanding the existing NSPS to equipment not previously regulated. In short, new methane rules will be developed for equipment across the oil and gas source category. Existing VOC standards will be extended to remaining unregulated equipment.
Under the proposed rule, EPA requires the following steps from owners and operators of oil and gas facilities:
- Finding and repairing leaks at well sites;
- Capturing natural gas from the completion of hydraulically fractured oil wells;
- Limiting emissions from new and modified pneumatic pumps; and
- Limiting emissions from several types of equipment used at natural gas transmission compressor stations, including compressors and pneumatic controllers.
Clarification of Air Permitting Rules for Oil and Gas Industry
EPA also released a Fact Sheet describing clarifications to the air permitting rules for the oil and gas industry.
Under the Clean Air Act’s New Source Review (NSR) permitting rules, owners and operators are required to secure a permit in order to build a new source of emissions or significantly modify an existing source. EPA uses three main factors to determine whether a new source will require a permit. A permit is typically NOT required if the new source:
- Shares an industrial grouping (SIC code) with the existing facilities;
- Is under control of the same person/people; or
- Is located on contiguous or “adjacent” properties.
As happens often with the EPA environmental regulations, the standard “dictionary definition” of the word “adjacent” is not necessarily sufficient to capture the EPA’s true meaning here.
EPA has put forward two options for defining “adjacent” in the regulations. The first and more straightforward option is to define “adjacent” as equipment or activities located on the same site or on sites that are within a short distance (1/4 mile) of each other. The second option is to define “adjacent” to include both physical proximity and whether the new source is related-by-function to an existing permitted source (like being connected by a pipeline).
New Clean Air Act Regulations Now Available
A new online course is now available to help environmental engineers, EHS managers, and compliance officers keep their facilities in compliance with the US EPA’s Clean Air Act programs. The Clean Air Act Regulations guides professionals through compliance with Title V permit requirements, emissions and pollution controls, annual greenhouse gas (GHG) reporting, Risk Management Planning (RMP) responsibilities, and more.
Build the expertise needed to make informed on-the-job decisions that help your site control pollution and maintain compliance. Interactive, easy to use, and available 24/7, the new online course will help you get up to speed with new and changing EPA clean air rules and protect your facility from costly EPA enforcement.
The instructor was very very informative, helpful, understandable and pleasant. This course answered many questions I had, being new to this industry.
The course is well thought out and organized in a way that leads to a clearer understanding of the total training.
Hazmat Shipping Professional
The instructor kept the class engaged and made learning fun. There was a lot of information to cover but time flew by. I will definitely use Lion in the future!
Hazmat Shipping Professional
Attending Lion Technology classes should be mandatory for every facility that ships or stores hazmat.
This was the 1st instructor that has made the topic actually enjoyable and easy to follow and understand. Far better than the "other" training providers our company has attended!
Process & Resource Administrator
The instructor was very patient and engaging - willing to answer and help explain subject matter.
Material Control Superintendent
Excellent course. Very interactive. Explanations are great whether you get the questions wrong or right.
Environmental, Health & Safety Regional Manager
My experience with Lion training, both online and in the classroom, is that they are far better organized and provide a better sequential explanation of the material.
Manager, Dangerous Goods Transportation
I was recently offered an opportunity to take my training through another company, but I politely declined. I only attend Lion Technology workshops.
Material Production/Logistics Manager
Our instructor was very dynamic and kept everyone's interest. Hazmat shipping can be a dry, complicated topic but I was engaged the entire time.
Senior Director of EH&S
Download Our Latest Whitepaper
Use this guide to spot which tanks and substances are regulated under EPA's Underground Storage Tank program, and which are excluded as of October 2018.