Search

Final Rule Alert: EPA Updates Risk Management Program for Chemical Facilities

Posted on 12/27/2016 by Roger Marks

UPDATE: US EPA on May 30, 2018 published a proposed rule to “rescind almost all the requirements added to the accident prevention provisions program” of a 2017 rulemaking that expanded the Clean Air Act Risk Management Plan (RMP)chemical accident prevention requirements.

***

On December 21, EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy signed a Final Rule to amend the Clean Air Act Risk Management Plan (RMP) requirements for chemical facilities.
 

Clean Air Act RMP Accident Prevention Program Revisions

The Final Rule includes three revisions to the accident prevention program requirements under the RMP:

1. Require all facilities with Program 2 or 3 processes to conduct a root cause analysis as part of an incident investigation into a catastrophic release or a near-miss;
2. Require regulated facilities with a Program 2 or 3 processes to contract with an independent third party to perform a compliance audit after the facility has a reportable release; and
3. Require owners or operators of facilities with Program 3 processes under NAICS Codes 322 (paper manufacturing), 234 (petroleum and coal products manufacturing) and 325 (chemical manufacturing) to add a safer technology and alternatives analysis (STAA) to its process hazard analysis (PHA).

A pre-publication copy of the Final Rule is available here.
 

Clean Air Act RMP Emergency Response “Enhancements”

EPA Risk Management Program for chemical facilitiesThe Final Rule includes three “enhancements” to bolster the requirements for RMP emergency preparedness and response. The RMP emergency response enhancements are as follows: 

1. Require owners/operators of facilities with Program 2 or 3 processes to coordinate with local emergency response agencies at least once per year to ensure preparedness to respond to an accidental release of a regulated substance;
2. Require facilities with Program 2 or 3 processes to conduct annual notification exercises to ensure emergency contact information is accurate and complete;
3. Require all facilities subject to the emergency response pre-program requirements (Subpart E) to conduct a full field exercise at least once every ten years and tabletop exercises at least once every three years.
 

Enhanced Clean Air Act RMP Information Availability

Lastly, the Final Rule sets requirements to make chemical hazard information more easily available to the public. Among these enhancements is a requirement for the facility owner or operator to provide ongoing notification of information availability on a company website, social media, or other publicly accessible place. If and when an RMP reportable accident occurs, the facility must hold a public meeting within 90 days of the incident.

In the proposed rule, published in the Federal Register in March 2016, EPA put forth requirements for facilities to provide certain information to emergency responders. In the Final Rule, EPA instead will require facilities to share information during annual coordination activities between the facility and responders. 
 

New Clean Air Act Online Course Now Available!


Build the expertise needed to make informed on-the-job decisions that help your site control pollution, prevent releases, and maintain compliance with US EPA’s Clean Air Act rules. The Clean Air Act Regulations guides professionals through compliance with Title V permit requirements, emissions and pollution controls, annual greenhouse gas (GHG) reporting, Risk Management Planning (RMP) responsibilities, and more. 

Interactive, easy to use, and available 24/7, the new online course will help you get up to speed with new and changing EPA clean air rules and protect your facility from costly EPA enforcement. 

Tags: Act, Air, Clean, EPA, new rules, RMP

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

Lion courses are the standard to which all other workshops should strive for!

Brody Saleen

Registered Environmental Health Specialist

The exercises in the DOT hazardous materials management course are especially helpful in evaluating your understanding of course information.

Morgan Bliss

Principal Industrial Hygienist

Lion's course was superior to others I have taken in the past. Very clear in the presentation and the examples helped to explain the content presented.

George Bersik

Hazardous Waste Professional

The instructor was very engaging and helped less experienced people understand the concepts.

Steve Gall

Safety Leader

Best instructor ever! I was going to take my DOT training w/a different provider, but based on this presentation, I will also be doing my DOT training w/Lion!

Donna Moot

Hazardous Waste Professional

Lion courses always set the bar for content, reference, and practical application. Membership and access to the experts is an added bonus.

John Brown, CSP

Director of Safety & Env Affairs

Course instructor was better prepared and presented better than other trainers. Course manual and references were easier to use as well.

Marty Brownfield

Hazardous Waste Professional

The course is well thought out and organized in a way that leads to a clearer understanding of the total training.

David Baily

Hazmat Shipping Professional

I can take what I learned in this workshop and apply it to everyday work and relate it to my activities.

Shane Hersh

Materials Handler

I have attended other training providers, but Lion is best. Lion is king of the hazmat jungle!!!

Henry Watkins

Hazardous Waste Technician

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

In-flight hazmat incidents can be disastrous. This guide gives 5 tips for first-time air shippers to consider before offering dangerous goods for transportation on passenger or cargo aircraft.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.