Search

EPA Enforcement Roundup: Week of 12/9

Posted on 12/10/2019 by Lauren Scott

Every day, facilities across the US receive Notices of Violation from US EPA for alleged noncompliance with a wide variety of programs like the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts, chemical management and reporting regulations (TSCA, EPCRA, CERCLA, etc.), hazardous waste management and disposal standards (RCRA), and much more.

Below are examples of recent EPA enforcement actions that provide insight into how and why EPA issues civil penalties to facilities for environmental noncompliance. Names of companies and individuals cited by EPA are withheld to protect their privacy.
 

WHO: 11 cement manufacturing plants
WHERE: AL, CA, IA, IN, MD, NY, PA, and TX
WHAT: Clean Air Act violations
HOW MUCH: $1.3 million plus $12 million in facility improvements

A nation-wide manufacturing company has agreed to a multi-million-dollar settlement with EPA over alleged excess sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions at its 11 facilities. The company has also agreed to install new emission controls at its cement kilns to adhere to current emission standards. EPA estimates the new controls will reduce air pollution by more than 4,555 tons of nitrogen oxides and 989 tons of sulfur dioxide each year.

Facilities covered by the settlement are in Leeds, AL; Cupertino, Redding, and Tehachapi, CA; Mason City, IA; Mitchell, IN; Union Bridge, MD; Glens Falls, NY; Fleetwood and York, PA; and Woodway, TX.  
 

WHO: A waste management servicer
WHERE: Richland, WA
WHAT: RCRA violations
HOW MUCH: $23,375

EPA announced a consent agreement and final order with a Northwest waste management company to resolve alleged RCRA violations from 2013 and 2014. EPA alleges the company’s liability insurance policy during this time did not provide required coverage for third-party bodily injury and property damage claims. This coverage was necessary because of the mixed waste the facility manages from the Department of Energy Hanford site.

The company has since come into full compliance with its RCRA permit and agreed to pay over $23k in penalties.
 

WHO: A recycling center
WHERE: Burlington, WA
WHAT: Clean Water Act violations
HOW MUCH: $22,375 plus $1,685,722 in supplemental projects

A Washington recycling center was allegedly operating in violation of Washington’s NPDES Industrial Stormwater General Permit by failing to perform monthly inspections and complete a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. Other violations include unauthorized wastewater discharges into the waters of the US.

The facility has agreed to install a stormwater treatment system as part of a Supplemental Environmental Program to eliminate the discharge of any polluted stormwater to waters of the U.S. The total value of the Supplemental Environmental Program is estimated to be $1,685,722. 
 

Convenient, Effective Online EHS Manager Training

Managing site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERLCA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field, or need an update on changing EPA rules, online training is a convenient way to quickly build in-depth expertise.

Check out the latest EPA compliance training options here:
 
Clean Air Act Regulations Online
TSCA Regulations Online
New! Clean Water Act & SDWA Regulations Online
Just Launched! Superfund and Right-to-Know Act Regulations Online 
 
The 2020 nationwide schedule for the Complete Environmental Regulations Workshop is available online. Collaborate with other managers to identify the requirements that apply to your facility, ask the right questions, and make the right decisions about EPA compliance.
 

Tags: Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, enforcement, environmental, EPA, EPA Enforcement Roundup, fines, hazardous waste, penalties, pollution, RCRA

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

Lion Technology workshops are amazing!! You always learn so much, and the instructors are fantastic.

Dorothy Rurak

Environmental Specialist

Given the choice, I would do all coursework this way. In-person courses go very fast without the opportunity to pause or repeat anything.

Ellen Pelton

Chemical Laboratory Manager

My experience with Lion training, both online and in the classroom, is that they are far better organized and provide a better sequential explanation of the material.

Robert Roose

Manager, Dangerous Goods Transportation

I have been to other training companies, but Lion’s material is much better and easier to understand.

Mark Abell

Regional Manager

I was able to present my scenario to the instructor and worked thru the regulations together. In the past, I attended another training firm's classes. Now, I have no intention of leaving Lion!

Diana Joyner

Senior Environmental Engineer

More thorough than a class I attended last year through another company.

Troy Yonkers

HSES Representative

We have a very busy work schedule and using Lion enables us to take the course at our own time. It makes it easy for me to schedule my employees' training.

Timothy Mertes

Hazmat Shipping Professional

Convenient; I can train when I want, where I want.

Barry Cook

Hazmat Shipping Professional

Having the tutorial buttons for additional information was extremely beneficial.

Sharon Ziemek

EHS Manager

The course was very informative and presented in a way that was easily understood and remembered. I would recommend this course.

Jeffrey Tierno

Hazmat Shipping Professional

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Ace hazmat inspections. Protect personnel. Defend against civil and criminal penalties. How? See the self-audit "best practices" for hazardous materials shippers.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.