Lion's office will be closed on Friday, July 4, in observance of Independence Day. For help with online training, please contact support@lion.com.
Search

EPA Enforcement Roundup: Week of 12/28

Posted on 12/28/2020 by Lauren Scott

Every day, facilities across the US receive Notices of Violation from US EPA for alleged noncompliance with a wide variety of programs like the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts; chemical management and reporting regulations (TSCA, EPCRA, CERCLA, etc.); hazardous waste management and disposal standards (RCRA); and much more.

Below are examples of recent EPA enforcement actions that provide insight into how and why EPA issues civil penalties to facilities for environmental noncompliance. Names of companies and individuals cited by EPA are withheld to protect their privacy.
 

WHO: A cattle ranch
WHERE: Armstrong, IA
WHAT: Clean Water Act violations
HOW MUCH: $76,000

Two brothers operating a cattle farming business have been ordered to pay $76,000 for alleged Clean Water Act violations. According to the judge’s ruling, the company repeatedly discharged stormwater containing pollutants through an underground pipe that drained into the East Fork of the Des Moines River without having obtained a permit.

Animal feeding operations that contain over 300 head of cattle and discharge pollutants through man-made conveyances to streams and rivers are required to obtain a Clean Water Act permit and take measures to minimize or eliminate discharges of pollutants in stormwater runoff from their facilities.
 

WHO: An industrial fuel company
WHERE: Juneau, Ketchikan, Douglas, and Palmer, AK
WHAT: EPCRA and Clean Air Act violations
HOW MUCH: $1,337,365

EPA recently announced a settlement with an Alaskan fuel company to resolve alleged violations of National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants as well as the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA). EPA alleges the company failed to report information about certain chemicals and chemical compounds at its Juneau and Ketchikan terminal facilities annually from 2013 to 2018, which is required under EPCRA.

The company processed liquid petroleum, which contained benzene, cyclohexane, ethylbenzene, naphthalene, toluene, xylene, 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene, n-Hexane, and lead compounds in quantities that exceeded their threshold reporting amounts.
 

WHO: A filter manufacturer
WHERE: Oxnard, CA
WHAT: Clean Water Act violations
HOW MUCH: $390,000 plus $510,000 in equipment upgrades

A California-based company that makes filtering products for consumer goods was found to be improperly discharging wastewater into Oxnard’s municipal sewer system, according to EPA. EPA also alleges the company violated a 2017 administrative order to install treatment technology that would achieve the pretreatment requirements specified in its permit.

In addition to the $390,000 penalty, the manufacturing company will spend $510,000 to install equipment that will ensure wastewater meets permit guidelines by November 2021. The California-based company will provide EPA with semi-annual reports on compliance.
 
Convenient, Effective Online EHS Manager Training
Managing site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERLCA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field or need an update on changing EPA rules, online training is a convenient way to quickly build in-depth expertise.

Check out the latest EPA compliance training options here:
 
Complete Environmental Regulations
Clean Air Act Regulations Online
TSCA Regulations Online
Clean Water Act & SDWA Regulations Online
Superfund and Right-to-Know Act Regulations Online 
 

Tags: Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, environmental, EPA, EPA Enforcement Roundup, EPCRA, fines, penalties

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

The instructor made the class very enjoyable and catered to the needs of our group.

Sarah Baker

Planner

The course is well thought out and organized in a way that leads to a clearer understanding of the total training.

David Baily

Hazmat Shipping Professional

I really enjoy your workshops. Thank you for such a great program and all the help Lion has provided me over the years!

George Chatman

Hazardous Material Pharmacy Technician

My experience with Lion classes has always been good. Lion Technology always covers the EPA requirements I must follow.

Steven Erlandson

Environmental Coordinator

Given the choice, I would do all coursework this way. In-person courses go very fast without the opportunity to pause or repeat anything.

Ellen Pelton

Chemical Laboratory Manager

Excellent class, super instructor, very easy to follow. No rushing through material. Would like to take his class again.

Lawrence Patterson

EH&S Facility Maintenance & Security Manager

This training broke down the regulations in an easy-to-understand manner and made them less overwhelming. I now feel I have the knowledge to make more informed decisions.

Amanda Oswald

Shipping Professional

Best instructor ever! I was going to take my DOT training w/a different provider, but based on this presentation, I will also be doing my DOT training w/Lion!

Donna Moot

Hazardous Waste Professional

Having the tutorial buttons for additional information was extremely beneficial.

Sharon Ziemek

EHS Manager

My experience with Lion training, both online and in the classroom, is that they are far better organized and provide a better sequential explanation of the material.

Robert Roose

Manager, Dangerous Goods Transportation

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Just starting out with shipping lithium batteries? The four fundamental concepts in this guide are the place to start.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.