Available Now: 2023 Schedule of Hazmat & RCRA Training
Search

OSHA GHS Guidance: Using 'Weight of Evidence' to Classify Hazards

Posted on 2/19/2016 by Roger Marks

Professionals in the chemical industry face new challenges now that OSHA’s adoption of the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) is in full effect. Of these challenges, one of the most prominent is adjusting to new hazard classification criteria and procedures that have changed to harmonize US rules with international standards.

To classify a chemical in the workplace, chemical manufacturers, importers, and employers rely on the evidence and information available to help determine if the chemical is hazardous and, if so, how hazardous. 

Physical Hazards vs. Health Hazards
Classifying physical hazards is typically straightforward: A chemical is flammable, for instance, if it has a measured flash point below a certain value. Classification of chronic health risks, though, can be more complex.

In some cases, a classification can be reached by evaluating the quantitative test data (e.g., LD50 for toxicity). Other times, however, the available data may be too complex or conflicting to result in a single classification. When this happens, the manufacturer, importer, or employer should use an approach known as “weight of evidence” (WoE) to determine the level of hazard.

What Is the GHS Weight of Evidence Approach?
The “Weight of Evidence” approach refers to the practice of combining and analyzing all of the available information that could affect the hazard classification—in vitro test results, relevant animal data, epidemiological and clinical studies, case reports, etc.

In many cases, the scientific information alone may be insufficient to make a sure-fire hazard determination. To classify these chemicals, employers should use “weight of information”—in essence, assigning more “weight” to the most reliable information.

Here is a step by step approach for evaluating weight of evidence, as found in OSHA's WoE draft guidance: 
Common steps to classify chemicals based on WoE
OSHA Seeks Comments on Latest GHS Guidance
To help employers classify chemical hazards using the WoE approach, OSHA has created and shared an expansive “Weight of Evidence” guidance document. OSHA is requesting public comments on this document. The document includes specific hierarchies of information and how employers should use the data available to reach a determination.

The new guidance is a complement to a previous OSHA document, the Hazard Classification Guidance for Manufacturers, Importers, and Employers.

GHS Training for Managers and Employees
 
Make sure your employees are prepared to protect themselves under OSHA’s HCS with the Hazard Communication Online Course, updated to reflect the new GHS standards in effect since June 1, 2015. For EHS managers who oversee their site’s HazCom program, Lion offers the Managing Hazard Communication Online Course.

Tags: GHS, osha

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

Lion's online training is more comprehensive, has better slides, and is a superior training experience than what I would get from other trainers.

Robert Brenner

District Environmental Manager

I was recently offered an opportunity to take my training through another company, but I politely declined. I only attend Lion Technology workshops.

Stephanie Gilliam

Material Production/Logistics Manager

More thorough than a class I attended last year through another company.

Troy Yonkers

HSES Representative

The instructor kept the class engaged and made learning fun. There was a lot of information to cover but time flew by. I will definitely use Lion in the future!

Chelsea Minguela

Hazmat Shipping Professional

The online course was well thought out and organized, with good interaction between the student and the course.

Larry Ybarra

Material Release Agent

The price was reasonable, the time to complete the course was manageable, and the flexibility the online training allowed made it easy to complete.

Felicia Rutledge

Hazmat Shipping Professional

I was able to present my scenario to the instructor and worked thru the regulations together. In the past, I attended another training firm's classes. Now, I have no intention of leaving Lion!

Diana Joyner

Senior Environmental Engineer

I had a positive experience utilizing this educational program. It was very informative, convenient, and rewarding from a career perspective.

John Gratacos

Logistics Manager

Amazing instructor; real-life examples. Lion training gets better every year!

Frank Papandrea

Environmental Manager

Much better than my previous class with another company. The Lion instructor made sense, kept me awake and made me laugh!

Marti Severs

Enterprise Safety Manager

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

This guide will help you identify 25 of the most -cited errors in RCRA training, recordkeeping, hazardous waste ID, container management, universal waste, and laboratories.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.