Search

What’s the Difference Between Lockout/Tagout and Machine Guarding?

Posted on 2/27/2018 by Joel Gregier

When operating or working around dangerous machinery, workers can sustain serious injuries: lacerations, amputations, crushing, and, in the worst-case scenario, death. Here we’ll look at how OSHA protects workers from machine hazards through two OSHA Standards for employers that, despite similar goals, must both be followed to maintain 29 CFR compliance.

The most significant machinery-related standards OSHA enforces machinery are its Lockout/Tagout and Machine Guarding Standards. The goal of these is to make sure employees working around machinery avoid injury and stay safe.

Unfortunately, these two standards are nearly always in OSHA’s top 10 most-violated standards. And when employees do get hurt around machinery, it is often a serious injury that results in medical treatment and lost time. Simply put, employers cannot afford to be lax about machine hazards.

While both the lockout/tagout and machine guarding Standards protect employees who work with or around machinery, the two apply at different times. One applies while the machine is in use, while the other applies when the machine is not in service.

What Are OSHA’s Lockout/Tagout Rules?

OSHA’s Lockout/tagout Standard or “Control of Hazardous Energy” Standard (29 CFR 1910.147), aims to safeguard employees during maintenance activities, when the machinery is supposed to stay off.
lockout-tagout.jpg
Unexpected startup of machinery or release of hazardous energy can lead to serious injuries, especially since employees must often touch and reach inside the machinery to perform needed maintenance. To prevent these machines from kicking on, maintenance workers must ensure locks (or in some cases tags) are applied over the means of startup (for instance, switches).

In 2017, 2,877 violations of Lockout/tagout rules were enough to rank Control of Hazardous Energy as the #5 most cited OSHA safety Standards.

What Are OSHA’s Machine Guarding Rules?

OSHA’s machine guarding Standard (29 CFR 1910.212) made OSHA’s top 10 most-cited list for 2017 too. This Standard protects workers while machines are powered on. Workers who operate and work around machinery must be protected from hazards at the point of operation (cutting, shaping, etc.), ingoing nip points, rotating parts, and flying chips and sparks.
 
beryllium_exposure_worker.jpgExamples of machine guards can include:
  • Actual physical guards that create a barrier between the employee and the machinery;
  • devices (e.g., sensors) that  turn off the machinery if the employee enters dangerous areas; or
  • automated feeds that let the machine pull product rather than the employee, and others.
Among the 1,933 machine guarding violations recorded by OSHA in 2017, point-of-operation hazards were the most common source of noncompliance.
shutterstock_45738223.jpg
Learn more about OSHA’s Machine Guarding Standards here.

Effecitve Lockout/Tagout and Machine Training Is Critical

Not only do facilities need to have lockout/tagout and machine guarding tools in place, but, importantly, they need to train their employees on their policies and procedures. Particularly, lockout/tagout requires a thorough understanding on how to utilize locks and tags since it is the maintenance employees themselves who will apply them. Locks and tags themselves can’t protect anyone if they are not applied properly and at the right time.

Convenient, Effective OSHA Safety Training

Employers must provide employees with effective safety training that empowers workers to protect themselves and their co-workers from the hazards present in any given workplace.

Check out our expanded OSHA safety training Catalog for convenient, interactive OSHA online courses that give employees the knowledge and tools to get any job done safely. From Lockout/Tagout to HAZWOPER, HazCom, OSHA 10-Hour, lithium battery safety and much more, find courses to protect your workers at Lion.com/OSHA.  
 

Tags: 29, CFR', lockout, osha, safety, safety training, tagout

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

Amazing instructor; real-life examples. Lion training gets better every year!

Frank Papandrea

Environmental Manager

The instructor made the class very enjoyable and catered to the needs of our group.

Sarah Baker

Planner

Lion's online training is more comprehensive, has better slides, and is a superior training experience than what I would get from other trainers.

Robert Brenner

District Environmental Manager

One of the best trainings I have ever received!

Brandon Morfin

EH&S Manager

This course went above my expectations from the moment I walked in the door. The instructor led us through two days packed with useful compliance information.

Rachel Stewart

Environmental Manager

I really enjoy your workshops. Thank you for such a great program and all the help Lion has provided me over the years!

George Chatman

Hazardous Material Pharmacy Technician

The instructor was very engaging and helped less experienced people understand the concepts.

Steve Gall

Safety Leader

My experience with Lion training, both online and in the classroom, is that they are far better organized and provide a better sequential explanation of the material.

Robert Roose

Manager, Dangerous Goods Transportation

These are the best classes I attend each year. I always take something away and implement improvements at my sites.

Kim Racine

EH&S Manager

I have been to other training companies, but Lion’s material is much better and easier to understand.

Mark Abell

Regional Manager

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Spot and correct 4 of the most common universal waste errors before they result in a notice of violation during a Federal or state inspection.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.