EPA Clarifies Its WOTUS Repeal Rule
In the notice, EPA states that some of those who submitted comments on the 2017 proposal may have been confused about the scope or content of what EPA proposed.
In short, the July 12, 2018 notice clarifies that:
- EPA has proposed a full and permanent repeal of the 2015 WOTUS Rule; and
- Commenters are welcome to address legal and policy reasons for or against repeal.
How WOTUS Changes Affect Regulated FacilitiesHow EPA defines “waters of the United States” is critical to enforcement of the nation’s water laws. This definition tells the regulated community which bodies of water—oceans, lakes, rivers, streams, creeks, swamps, and more—are subject to the requirements of the Clean Water Act (CWA).
EPA’s jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act has implications for environmental programs like:
- Oil Discharge Notifications (40 CFR 110).
- Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plans (40 CFR 112).
- NPDES Permitting and Stormwater Discharge Permits (40 CFR 122).
- The “per-industry standards” (40 CFR 405-471).
- Dredge and Fill Permitting (33 CFR 323).
The 2015 Final Rule arguably expanded EPA’s jurisdiction to protect the nation’s waters, in part by broadening the Agency’s interpretation of the CWA. In the rule, EPA added and/or amended regulatory definitions for terms like “adjacent,” “tributary,” and “navigable” that are found in Clean Water Act §502(7).
What Was in the 2015 WOTUS Rule?
The 2015 rule hinged largely on the idea of regulating waters that share a “significant nexus” with waters of the United States. The idea of a “significant nexus” was articulated by Supreme Court Justice Kennedy to describe waters that, though not protected under the Clean Water Act, may impact waters within EPA’s jurisdiction due to proximity or flow of water from one body to another. (See Rapanos v. US.)
A ‘‘significant nexus,” according to the 2015 rule, means “a water, including wetlands, that either alone or in combination with other similar situated waters in the region, significantly affects the chemical physical or biological integrity” of any water under EPA’s jurisdiction.
EPA now says that “…rather than achieving its stated objective of increasing predictability and consistency under the CWA, the 2015 Rule is creating significant confusion and uncertainty for agency staff, regulated entities, states, tribes, local governments, and the public….”
For those reasons, EPA plans to repeal entirely the changes made in 2015.
If the July 2017 proposal is finalized, the regulations that define the scope of EPA’s Clean Water Act enforcement authority will return to their pre-2015 form.
What’s in the Recodification Proposal?
Even if finalized, the proposed repeal will not have an immediate impact on facilities, given that the enforcement of the 2015 Final Rule is already on hold.
During his tenure, former EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt officially delayed the applicability of the 2015 Rule until February 2020 after legal challenges and a nationwide stay put in place. For now, EPA will continue to more narrowly interpret the phrase “navigable waters” as required by a Presidential Executive Order issued last year that requires EPA to rescind or revise the 2015 Final Rule.
Hopefully for EHS professionals, EPA’s next attempt to re-define WOTUS will result in a clear, sensible, and intuitive way to determine which bodies of waters are protected by regulation.
In Houston: Complete Environmental Are you the go-to person for all things EHS at your facility? Join us in Houston on August 9–10 for the nationally trusted Complete Environmental Regulations Workshop.
Regulations Training, August 9—10
Understanding the air, water, and chemical regulations that apply to your facility will help you communicate clearly and confidently with your organization and better defend your business against costly fines, penalties, and future liability. This workshop covers the critical elements of major EPA programs that impact industrial facilities every day.
Can’t attend live? Check out the Complete Environmental Regulations Online Course , The online course is packed with training content, tutorials, resources, and FAQs that clarify and simplify the complex, overlapping EPA rules you must know.
Find a Post
Energetic/enthusiastic! Made training enjoyable, understandable and fun!
Hazardous Waste Professional
The instructor was excellent. They knew all of the material without having to read from a notepad or computer.
Best instructor ever! I was going to take my DOT training w/a different provider, but based on this presentation, I will also be doing my DOT training w/Lion!
Hazardous Waste Professional
The workshop covered a lot of information without being too overwhelming. Lion is much better, more comprehensive than other training providers.
I can take what I learned in this workshop and apply it to everyday work and relate it to my activities.
The instructor does a great job at presenting material in an approachable way. I have been able to save my company about $30,000 in the last year with what I have learned from Lion!
I was able to present my scenario to the instructor and worked thru the regulations together. In the past, I attended another training firm's classes. Now, I have no intention of leaving Lion!
Senior Environmental Engineer
I tried other environmental training providers, but they were all sub-standard compared to Lion. I will not stray from Lion again!
The online course was well thought out and organized, with good interaction between the student and the course.
Material Release Agent
Convenient; I can train when I want, where I want.
Hazmat Shipping Professional
Download Our Latest Whitepaper
Four key considerations to help you maximize the convenience and quality of your experience with online training.