Search

EPA to Set New MCLs for PFOA and PFOS

Posted on 7/16/2018 by Anthony Cardno

During his keynote speech at the PFAS National Leadership Summit on May 22, 2018, EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt  announced EPA's plan to set maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for two toxic PFAS chemicals, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) under the Safe Drinking Water Act.

EPA has previously identified PFOA and PFOS on the SDWA’s most recent Contaminant Candidate List, the CCL4, released by EPA on November 17, 2016. [81 FR 81099] 

That same year, the EPA announced health advisories for both PFOA and PFOS, set at 70 parts per trillion. Under the Safe Drinking Water Act, health advisories are non-regulatory and non-enforceable guidance to states and to public water systems.

What Is an MCL?

An MCL is a standard set by US EPA that indicates the maximum concentration of a contaminant that can be present in drinking water and have that water still be deemed “fit for human consumption” for each contaminant.

What Is the Contaminant Candidate List?

Under 1996’s Safe Drinking Water Act Amendment, Congress directed EPA to create a list of contaminants that are:

  • Not currently subject to regulation under the SDWA, but

  • Are known, or are anticipated, to occur in public drinking water systems and may require SDWA regulation.

The presence of a chemical on the CCL does not automatically indicate that the chemical is regulated or even that it will be regulated in the future. But it is a “heads-up” to public water systems that regulations might be written down the line.

EPA is required to update the CCL every five years. The first version was published in 1998 and the most recent in 2016. The CCL4 includes twelve microbiological contaminants and 97 chemical contaminants or contaminant groups.

How Do Chemicals Go from the CCL to Full Regulation?

EPA is required by law to make regulatory determinations on at least five chemicals on each CCL update. That is, out of the 109 items on the CCL4, EPA must decide whether to create MCLs for at least five of them by November 17, 2021.

The “regulatory determination’ that EPA makes may or may not impose a new MCL. EPA can decide that no action is necessary to protect human health—the decision to not create an MCL also counts as a “regulatory determination,” even though no new rules must be created.

For example, of the five chemicals to receive regulatory determinations from the CCL3 (published in 2009), only one (strontium) was determined to meet the criteria for establishing MCLs. The other four (dimethoate, 1,3-dinitrobenzene, terbufos, and terbufos sulfone) were determined not to meet that criteria.

What Criteria Does EPA Use to Create MCLs?

The SDWA sets three criteria for determining if a contaminant should be regulated:

  1. Might the contaminant have an adverse effect on human health?

  2. Is the contaminant known to occur (or is there a substantial likelihood it will occur) in public water systems at a frequency and level of public health concern?

  3. Does regulation of the pollutant present a meaningful opportunity for the reduction of health risks for people serviced by public water systems?

EPA currently feels that perfluorooctanoic acid and perfluorooctane sulfonate meet these criteria, and the Agency is now beginning the process of establishing MCLs. Unlike the previously established health advisories for PFOA and PFOS, the MCLs—once promulgated—will be regulations and thus enforceable.

Training for Every "Go-to Environmental Person"

Are you the go-to person for all things EHS at your facility? Understanding the air, water, and chemical regulations that apply to your facility will help you communicate clearly and confidently with your organization and better defend your operations from penalties, emergency incidents, and future liability. 

Check out the Complete Environmental Regulations Online Training, The course is packed with training content, tutorials, resources, and retention-boosting exercises and activities that clarify and simplify EPA's complicated, overlapping rules. 

Tags: Act, Clean, EPA, new rules, PFOA, PFOS, Water

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

Lion courses are the standard to which all other workshops should strive for!

Brody Saleen

Registered Environmental Health Specialist

The instructor was energetic and made learning fun compared to dry instructors from other training providers.

Andy D’Amato

International Trade Compliance Manager

If I need thorough training or updating, I always use Lion. Lion is always the best in both instruction and materials.

Bryce Parker

EHS Manager

The instructor was very dedicated to providing a quality experience. She did her best to make sure students were really comprehending the information.

Stephanie Venn

Inventory Control Specialist

Lion is at the top of the industry in compliance training. Course content and structure are updated frequently to make annual re-training enjoyable. I like that Lion has experts that I can contact for 1 year after the training.

Caroline Froning

Plant Chemist

Well designed and thorough program. Excellent summary of requirements with references. Inclusion of regulations in hard copy form, as well as full electronic with state pertinent regulations included is a great bonus!

Oscar Fisher

EHS Manager

We have a very busy work schedule and using Lion enables us to take the course at our own time. It makes it easy for me to schedule my employees' training.

Timothy Mertes

Hazmat Shipping Professional

Lion provided an excellent introduction to environmental regulations, making the transition to a new career as an EHS specialist less daunting of a task. Drinking from a fire hose when the flow of water is lessened, is much more enjoyable!

Stephanie Weathers

SHE Specialist

Attending Lion Technology classes should be mandatory for every facility that ships or stores hazmat.

Genell Drake

Outbound Lead

The instructor made the class very enjoyable and catered to the needs of our group.

Sarah Baker

Planner

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Hazardous materials shipment rejections bear a big cost. Use this guide to end operational and logistical disruptions that severely impact your bottom line.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.