Lion's office will be closed November 27 and 28. Online training support is available every day from 8:30 AM to 5 PM ET via support@lion.com.
Search

Final Rule Alert: EPA Amends 2015 Coal Combustion Residuals Rule

Posted on 7/26/2018 by Roger Marks

shutterstock_20957983.jpgNew Acting EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler on Wednesday, July 18 announced that the Agency has finalized a set of amendments to the 2015 CCR Rule, which regulated the disposal of coal combustion residuals.

New requirements added for coal-burning power plants in the 2015 CCR Rule included national minimum criteria for coal combustion residuals landfills and surface impoundments. The CCR Rule also introduced new limits on expansion of CCR disposal facilities and would have required closure or retro-fitting of certain landfills and surface impoundments that could not meet certain performance criteria.

The changes finalized in a rule signed by the Administrator represent “phase one” of EPA’s plan to reconsider and/or revise the 2015 CCR Rule. For a full review of what’s changing in the CCR rule, check out the pre-publication version here.


What’s in Phase One of EPA’s CCR Revisions?

Here what you should know about “phase one” of EPA’s plans.
 
  • Add a provision which allows the Participating State Director to issue certifications in lieu of a professional engineer (PE).
  • Add a provision which allows the Participating State Director to approve the suspension of groundwater monitoring in certain circumstances.
  • Revise groundwater protection standards (GWPS) for four chemicals listed in Appendix IV of 40 CFR 257.
  • Extend, in some cases, the deadline by which facilities must cease placing waste in CCR units closing for cause.
EPA estimates the cost savings of this rulemaking to be between $27 million and $32 million.


Why Do Power Plants Discharge “Coal Ash” to the Water?

coal-fired-power-plant.jpgThe 2015 Final Rule was not US EPA's first attempt to “clean up” the byproducts of coal-fired electricity generation. Between 1974 and 1982, US EPA created and revised effluent limitation guidelines for wastewaters from utilities. Since then, EPA has made great progress restricting air pollution emissions from steam-powered electric power generators.

One major way power plants have "cleaned up" their air emissions over time is by filtering, or "scrubbing," to remove particulate matter like soot and ash, or toxic chemicals like sulfur, nitrogen, and mercury. The air emissions pass through a water-based filter system that "scrubs" the air, removing particulate matter from the air and resulting in cleaner air emissions.

The soot, ash, and other substances left behind in the scrubber water then must be discharged somehow. Put simply, to better protect the air, power plants were left to shift these pollutants to the water instead.


In Houston: Complete Environmental
Regulations Training, August 9—10

Are you the go-to person for all things EHS at your facility? Join us in Houston on August 9–10 for the nationally trusted Complete Environmental Regulations Workshop.

chemist-oil-and-gas-young.jpgUnderstanding the air, water, and chemical regulations that apply to your facility will help you communicate clearly and confidently with your organization and better defend your business against costly fines, penalties, and future liability. This workshop covers the critical elements of major EPA programs that impact industrial facilities every day.
 
Can’t attend live? Check out the Complete Environmental Regulations Online Course The online course is packed with training content, tutorials, resources, and FAQs that clarify and simplify the complex, overlapping EPA rules you must know. 
 

Tags: Act, Clean, coal ash, EPA, new rules, RCRA, Water

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

Lion's course was superior to others I have taken in the past. Very clear in the presentation and the examples helped to explain the content presented.

George Bersik

Hazardous Waste Professional

The instructor had knowledge of regulations and understanding of real-world situations. The presentation style was engaging and fostered a positive atmosphere for information sharing.

Linda Arlen

Safety & Environmental Compliance Officer

More thorough than a class I attended last year through another company.

Troy Yonkers

HSES Representative

The online course was well thought out and organized, with good interaction between the student and the course.

Larry Ybarra

Material Release Agent

You blew the doors off the competition!

Stephen Bieschke

Facilities Manager

I was able to present my scenario to the instructor and worked thru the regulations together. In the past, I attended another training firm's classes. Now, I have no intention of leaving Lion!

Diana Joyner

Senior Environmental Engineer

I really enjoyed this training. Even after years on both sides of the comprehension coin, I find myself still learning! The quality of the delivery exceeded much of the training I have received in the past.

Neil Ozonur

Safety Officer

Excellent job. Made what is very dry material interesting. Thoroughly explained all topics in easy-to-understand terms.

David Hertvik

Vice President

The course was very informative and presented in a way that was easily understood and remembered. I would recommend this course.

Jeffrey Tierno

Hazmat Shipping Professional

I have attended other training providers, but Lion is best. Lion is king of the hazmat jungle!!!

Henry Watkins

Hazardous Waste Technician

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Four key considerations to help you maximize the convenience and quality of your experience with online training.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.