Search

TSCA Reform Passes Senate, Awaits POTUS Signature

Posted on 6/8/2016 by Roger Marks

After passing the House of Representatives last week, long-awaited revisions to the United States’ major chemical management, reporting, and recordkeeping law—the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)—have now passed the Senate as well. Named the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act, the revisions to TSCA now require only a signature from the President to enact them into Federal law.

Reform of the Toxic Substances Control Act has come to be regarded as somewhat of a “unicorn” by the chemical industry and those who track changes to US environmental and safety laws: Long talked about, often debated on the floor of the House and Senate, but never quite achieved—until this week. Named for long-time New Jersey Senator Frank Lautenberg, for whom TSCA reform was a major goal, the TSCA revisions span nearly 200 pages and can be found on the US Congress' website.  

TSCA Updates in the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act


The Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act directs US EPA to create new chemicals regulations to implement changes in the law. Major out comes of the TSCA reform bill include that it will:
  • Require EPA to establish a process for performing risk assessments on chemical substances and designating each as high-priority or low-priority (Starting with substances addressed in the 2014 update to the TSCA Work Plan for Chemical Assessments);
  • Give EPA more power to regulate and ban bio-accumulative chemicals (those that build up in the body over time);
  • Give US EPA more tools to collect chemical data from manufactures, importers, and distributors.
  • EPA will be required to identify and regulate high priority chemicals under Section 6– including chemicals stored near significant sources of drinking water and chemicals that pose an “unreasonable risk to a potentially exposed or susceptible subpopulation”;
  • Require chemical manufacturers and processors to periodically substantiate claims of confidential trade secrets;
  • Define “susceptible subpopulation” (more on this below); and more.
Now that TSCA reform bill has been passed, it will fall to the Environmental Protection Agency to draft, proposes, and finalize new chemical regulations to implement the changes in the reformed law.   

In the meantime, the current TSCA reporting period started on June 1. Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) is significantly different for chemical manufacturers and importers in 2016. Sites must report more often, include more years of data, and grapple with lowered thresholds for reporting that will bring more chemicals into the fold of TSCA CDR reporting requirements. To find out more, read TSCA Form U Reporting in 2016—What’s New?    

TSCA Reform Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety Act

TSCA Environmental Justice—Defining “Susceptible Population”


Among the many, many changes in this newly passed TSCA update is a new definition—“potentially  exposed or susceptible subpopulation.” The term is defined as follows: 

“A group of individuals within the general population identified by the Administration who, due to either greater susceptibility or greater exposure, may be at greater risk than the general population of adverse health effects from exposure to a chemical substance or mixture, such as infants, children, pregnant women, workers, or the elderly." 

Read more changes to TSCA here.

Ready to Report? 2016 TSCA Reporting Starts June 1


Be confident you know the latest rules that affect the chemical data you report—before you report it. Changing TSCA reporting rules for 2016 can affect what you report and how you submit the information. Take the interactive TSCA Regulations Online Course to get a clear view of how to manage your chemical inventory, report to EPA, keep your import and export documentation accurate, and what’s required for TSCA Form U reports.

Tags: new, rules, TSCA

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

Energetic/enthusiastic! Made training enjoyable, understandable and fun!

Amanda Walsh

Hazardous Waste Professional

This course went above my expectations from the moment I walked in the door. The instructor led us through two days packed with useful compliance information.

Rachel Stewart

Environmental Manager

Lion's information is very thorough and accurate. Presenter was very good.

Melissa Little

Regulatory Manager

My experience with Lion training, both online and in the classroom, is that they are far better organized and provide a better sequential explanation of the material.

Robert Roose

Manager, Dangerous Goods Transportation

This is a very informative training compared to others. It covers everything I expect to learn and even a lot of new things.

Quatama Jackson

Waste Management Professional

Lion was very responsive to my initial questions and the website was user friendly.

Michael Britt

Supply Chain Director

The training was impressive. I am not a fan of online training but this was put together very well. I would recommend Lion to others.

Donnie James

Quality Manager

More thorough than a class I attended last year through another company.

Troy Yonkers

HSES Representative

The course was very well structured and covered the material in a clear, concise manner.

Ian Martinez

Hazmat Shipping Professional

The online course was well thought out and organized, with good interaction between the student and the course.

Larry Ybarra

Material Release Agent

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Use this guide as a quick reference to the most common HAZWOPER questions, and get course recommendations for managers and personnel who are in need of OSHA-required HAZWOPER training.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.