EPA Enforcement Roundup: Week of 3/14
The EPA enforcement actions highlighted below provide insight into how and why the Agency assesses civil penalties for environmental noncompliance. All violations mentioned are alleged unless we indicate otherwise.
We withhold the names of organizations and individuals subject to enforcement to protect their privacy.
WHO: Three affiliated oil and petrochemical facilities
A major oil and petrochemical company reached a settlement over alleged Clean Air Act violations at three of its facilities in Texas. According to the US Justice Department, the company failed to properly operate and monitor its industrial flares responsible for burning off volatile organic compounds, greenhouse gases, and other harmful pollutants.
WHERE: Cedar Bayou, Port Arthur, and Sweeney, TX
WHAT: Clean Air Act violations
HOW MUCH: $3.4 million plus $118 million in site upgrades
The company agreed to make sweeping changes at its facilities, in addition to paying a civil penalty. These new controls are estimated to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide, methane, and ethane, by over 75,000 tons per year.
WHO: A public utility company
EPA issued a consent decree stating that a public utility company is liable for contaminated soil that the company generated and distributed as landscaping fill in and around Pines, IN. The soil, contaminated by coal ash, contained hazardous substances, including arsenic, thallium and lead.
WHERE: Porter County, IN
WHAT: CERCLA violations
HOW MUCH: $11.8 million in site remediations
The company will provide site remediation at individual residences within the Town of Pines Groundwater Plume Superfund site and dispose of contaminated soil at a licensed waste disposal facility. The company is also required to monitor residential drinking water wells, groundwater monitoring wells, surface water, and sediments to ensure that contamination has not migrated to those locations.
WHO: A carbon fiber processing facility
Three accidental releases of hydrogen cyanide (HCN) at a carbon fiber plant resulted in a six-figure civil penalty. EPA alleges the company failed to report the releases in a timely manner in violation of Section 304 of EPCRA and Section 103 of CERCLA. The company paid $100,100 for violations of EPCRA and $39,000 for violations of CERCLA.
WHERE: Moses Lake, WA
WHAT: EPCRA and CERCLA violations
HOW MUCH: $139,100
In the first incident, the company allegedly waited 57 hours to notify the proper authorities of the HCN release, which occurred on November 25, 2017. Two additional releases in January 2018 and October 2019 resulted in approximately 40-minute and three-hour reporting delays respectively. HCN is a highly poisonous chemical and can be explosive in high concentrations.
Convenient, Effective Online EHS Manager TrainingManaging site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERLCA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field or need an update on changing EPA rules, online training is a convenient way to quickly build in-depth expertise.
Check out the latest EPA compliance training options here:
Complete Environmental Regulations
Clean Air Act Regulations Online
TSCA Regulations Online
Clean Water Act & SDWA Regulations Online
Superfund and Right-to-Know Act Regulations Online
Tags: CERCLA, Clean Air Act, EPCRA, fines, penalties, roundup
Find a Post
I had a positive experience utilizing this educational program. It was very informative, convenient, and rewarding from a career perspective.
I love that the instructor emphasized the thought process behind the regs.
Corporate Product Stewardship Specialist
Lion does a great job summarizing and communicating complicated EH&S-related regulations.
Sr. Environmental Engineer
Energetic/enthusiastic! Made training enjoyable, understandable and fun!
Hazardous Waste Professional
These are the best classes I attend each year. I always take something away and implement improvements at my sites.
Lion is easily and consistently the best option for compliance training. I've learned new information from every instructor I've had.
Lion was very extensive. There was a lot of things that were covered that were actually pertaining to what I do and work with. Great Job. I will be coming back in three years!
Hazmat Shipping Professional
Given the choice, I would do all coursework this way. In-person courses go very fast without the opportunity to pause or repeat anything.
Chemical Laboratory Manager
Having the tutorial buttons for additional information was extremely beneficial.
Lion is my preferred trainer for hazmat and DOT.
Download Our Latest Whitepaper
Use this guide as a quick reference to the most common HAZWOPER questions, and get course recommendations for managers and personnel who are in need of OSHA-required HAZWOPER training.