Search

OSHA Enforcement Roundup: Week of 3/18

Posted on 3/18/2024 by Lion Technology Inc.

The OSH Act of 1970 requires US employers to provide a safe, healthy workplace for every employee. Failure to comply with applicable OSHA health & safety standards can easily lead to preventable injuries and fatal accidents at workplaces of all types.

The enforcement actions highlighted below provide insight into how and why OSHA issues citations for workplace safety violations. All violations discussed are alleged only unless we say otherwise.

We withhold the names of organizations and individuals subject to enforcement to protect their privacy. Check out OSHA’s latest list of the 10 most-cited safety Standards here.


A brick manufacturer faces $124,212 in penalties for 11 serious alleged violations.

OSHA cited the clay brick manufacturer with 11 serious citations. Allegedly, the Agency found the employer exposed workers to airborne concentrations of respirable crystalline silica of up to six-and-a-half times the permissible exposure level.

In addition to the alleged respirable silica exposure, OSHA says the manufacturer:

Failed to:
  • Evaluate and implement engineering controls and work practices to reduce and maintain employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica to or below the permissible exposure.
  • Provide effective training on crystalline silica to employees exposed over the permissible exposure level.
Neglected to:
  • Offer free medical surveillance, at a reasonable time and place, to employees exposed to respirable crystalline silica above the action level for 30 or more days per year.
  • Fit test or provide medical evaluation for workers required to wear respirators.
And:
  • Required employees to wear respirators without providing training first.
  • Allowed employees to work in areas that required respirators without providing a compliant respiratory protection program.

A hardwood flooring manufacturer faces $269,662 in penalties for 28 serious and six other-than-serious alleged violations.

OSHA inspectors conducted an inspection at the manufacturer’s facility under the Agency's National Emphasis Program for amputation hazards in September 2023.

The company was cited for four repeat, 28 serious, and six other-than-serious violations. Specifically, OSHA says the employer failed to:

  • Train workers in lockout/tagout procedures.
  • Train employees on the hazards associated with chemicals in the workplace.
  • Record injuries in a timely manner.
  • Use required lockout/tagout procedures.
  • Provide adequate personal protective equipment.
  • Protect workers from electrical hazards.
  • Install adequate guarding to protect workers from contact with operating machine parts.
  • Implement a hearing conservation program, including training and hearing protection.
  • And more.

A frozen food manufacturer faces $551,719 in penalties after a worker suffered an amputation injury.

The manufacturer of frozen dumplings, wontons, and noodles has “an extensive history of violating federal safety and health standards” was investigated and cited once again after a worker suffered an amputation injury last summer.

The Agency alleges that the company exposed workers to lockout/tagout hazards and cited it for four willful, one repeat and three serious violations. The company has now been inspected six times in the past five years and was placed in the Severe Violator Enforcement Program after an inspection in 2021.


Online Training: Get to Know OSHA's Rules

Lion’s 10 Hour OSHA General Industry Online Course introduces new safety managers to a wide range of the most common workplace health & safety standards for general industry: hazard communication, providing PPE, fire extinguishers, forklifts, fall prevention, and much more.

Tags: HazCom, osha, OSHA Enforcement Roundup, reporting and recordkeeping

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

More thorough than a class I attended last year through another company.

Troy Yonkers

HSES Representative

I was able to present my scenario to the instructor and worked thru the regulations together. In the past, I attended another training firm's classes. Now, I have no intention of leaving Lion!

Diana Joyner

Senior Environmental Engineer

The instructor was very dedicated to providing a quality experience. She did her best to make sure students were really comprehending the information.

Stephanie Venn

Inventory Control Specialist

The training was impressive. I am not a fan of online training but this was put together very well. I would recommend Lion to others.

Donnie James

Quality Manager

The instructor created a great learning environment.

Avinash Thummadi

CAD & Environmental Manager

I chose Lion's online webinar because it is simple, effective, and easily accessible.

Jeremy Bost

Environmental Health & Safety Technician

We have a very busy work schedule and using Lion enables us to take the course at our own time. It makes it easy for me to schedule my employees' training.

Timothy Mertes

Hazmat Shipping Professional

The instructor did an excellent job presenting a very dry subject; keeping everyone interested and making it enjoyable.

Marc Bugg

Hazardous Waste Professional

My experience with Lion training, both online and in the classroom, is that they are far better organized and provide a better sequential explanation of the material.

Robert Roose

Manager, Dangerous Goods Transportation

If I need thorough training or updating, I always use Lion. Lion is always the best in both instruction and materials.

Bryce Parker

EHS Manager

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Hazardous materials shipment rejections bear a big cost. Use this guide to end operational and logistical disruptions that severely impact your bottom line.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.