Managing Ozone-depleting Substances in Refrigerating Appliances
Class I and Class II Ozone-depleting Substances
ODS are any substances identified on either the Class I List at 40 CFR 82, Appendix A or Class II List at 40 CFR 82, Appendix B. Class I ODS include numerous chlorinated fluorocarbon substances (CFC), halon, carbon tetrachloride, methyl chloroform, methyl bromide, and other brominated compounds. Class II ODS includes 38 hydro chlorofluorocarbons (HCFC).
Objective of the 40 CFR, Subpart F Standard
In general, the goal of the 40 CFR 82, Subpart F requirements are to prevent the release (knowingly or otherwise) of the regulated substances from the appliance. While most of the standard focuses on the persons performing service, maintenance, and repair (i.e., technicians) and the equipment they use, there are also some administrative requirements that may apply to the owners or operators of the covered appliances.
Unless otherwise indicated by the standard, the required records must be retained by the owner/operator for at least three years. [40 CFR 82.166(m)]
The owners/operators of appliances with 50 lbs. or more must keep service records. The records must include date of service, type of service, and quantity of ODS added [40 CFR 82.166(k)].
In general, covered appliances (e.g., refrigeration systems with > 50 lbs. of ODS) that exceed specified leak rates must have those leaks repaired within 30 days. [40 CFR 82.156(i)] However, there are times when the rules allow for an extension to the repair deadline. When these conditions are satisfied, the owner/operator of the appliance must prepare a report and submit it to the EPA with the content specified at 40 CFR 82.166(n). A copy of the report must be retained by the owner/operator.
Retrofitting Appliances Under 40 CFR 82.156(i)
Similarly, certain appliances are subject to specific timeframes for retrofilling or retiring under 40 CFR 82.156(i). If the covered system is permitted additional time, the owner/operator must prepare a report and submit it to the EPA with the content specified at 40 CFR 82.166(o). A copy of the report must be retained by the owner/operator.
In addition, there are recordkeeping requirements for owners/operators seeking to exclude certain losses from the leak rate determinations or use alternate methods for full charge determinations. [40 CFR 82.166(p) and (q)]
Changes Coming to Clean Air Act Subpart F
On November 9, 2015, the EPA published a proposed rule that would make changes to the 40 CFR 82, Subpart F requirements. Some of the significant proposed changes include:
- Requiring annual leak inspections (or continuous monitoring) for systems with 50 lbs. or more of ODS refrigerant.
- Requiring quarterly leak inspections (or continuous monitoring) for commercial refrigeration or industrial process refrigeration systems with 500 lbs. or more of ODS.
- Extending the refrigerant management program requirements to cover substitute refrigerants, including hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs).
- Requiring technicians to keep records of refrigerants recovered during system disposal from systems with charge sizes between 5 and 50 lbs.
- Prohibiting operation of systems with 50 lbs. or more of ODS that have leaked 75% or more of their full charge for 2 consecutive years.
New Clean Air Act Online Course Now Live on Lion.com!
Master the Clean Air Act regulations that affect your job and stay up to speed with new and pending changes to the EPA’s air rules. The Clean Air Act Regulations will guide you through the programs you must comply with—Risk Management Plans (RMP), New Source Review, national air quality standards, greenhouse gas reporting, and more. Be confident you know what it takes to keep the air around your facility—and your conscience—clean. Sign up now.
Find a Post
The instructor's energy, enthusiasm, and knowledge of the subject make the class a great learning experience!
This is the best RCRA training I've experienced! I will be visiting Lion training again.
Cynthia L. Logsdon
Principal Environmental Engineer
The instructor was very dedicated to providing a quality experience. She did her best to make sure students were really comprehending the information.
Inventory Control Specialist
I was recently offered an opportunity to take my training through another company, but I politely declined. I only attend Lion Technology workshops.
Material Production/Logistics Manager
I love that the instructor emphasized the thought process behind the regs.
Corporate Product Stewardship Specialist
Much better than my previous class with another company. The Lion instructor made sense, kept me awake and made me laugh!
Enterprise Safety Manager
The course was very well structured and covered the material in a clear, concise manner.
Hazmat Shipping Professional
The training was impressive. I am not a fan of online training but this was put together very well. I would recommend Lion to others.
I attended training from another provider and learned absolutely nothing. Lion is much better. Hands down.
You blew the doors off the competition!
Download Our Latest Whitepaper
Get to know the top 5 changes to OSHA’s revised GHS Hazard Communication Standard at 29 CFR 1910.1200 and how the updates impacts employee safety at your facility.