Search

Do I Need a NPDES Permit for Groundwater Discharge?

Posted on 5/6/2019 by Roger Marks and Anthony Cardno, CHMM

Update 11/28/2023: 

In late 2023, US EPA issued new draft guidance concerning when a NPDES permit is required to discharge pollutants to groundwater. The new guidance followed a 2020 Supreme Court decision in the case Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, and varies greatly from the interpretive statement below. 

Details about new NPDES draft guidance for groundwater discharge ("Maui Guidance").


Original Article Published May 2019 and Updated September 2019

US EPA recently clarified its stance on whether the Clean Water Act’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program covers point-source discharges to groundwater. Examples of a point-source discharging to groundwater include leaks from an underground pipeline or a remediation well.

In an interpretive statement posted to the Federal Register on April 23, EPA states its conclusion:

“The (Clean Water Act) is best read as excluding all releases of pollutants from a point source to groundwater from NPDES coverage, regardless of a hydrologic connection between the groundwater and jurisdictional surface water.”

(Emphasis ours)

Read EPA’s full interpretation in the Federal Register.

Is This a New Interpretation from EPA?

Yes and no. While this is EPA’s first official interpretation on this issue, generally, a NPDES permit is not required for common activities that result in discharge to groundwater.

These activities include aquifer recharge, leaks form sewage collection systems, septic system discharges, spills and accidental releases, or coal ash impoundment seepage. In fact, the word “groundwater” is completely absent from the legal text that authorizes the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements.

Do I Need a NPDES Permit for Groundwater Discharge?

That said, two ongoing court cases are challenging EPA’s view of point-source discharges to groundwater. Because of conflicting or confusing interpretations offered in the past, EPA felt a need to clarify its position in writing in advance of the Supreme Court taking up the appeals.

The two cases are:
County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. v. Upstate Forever

In both cases, the courts determined that NPDES requirements may apply when a pollutant released from a point source to groundwater migrates to navigable waters. While these decisions are being elevated for Supreme Court consideration, EPA will apply the court’s decisions to the Fourth and Ninth Circuits. For all other areas, EPA’s new interpretation applies.  

EPA Protections for Groundwater

This does not mean that groundwaters are not protected under the Clean Water Act or other EPA regulations. Under the CWA, all states may regulate nonpoint source pollution—meaning, broadly speaking, any water pollution not covered by Section 402 of the Clean Water Act (i.e., the NPDES permitting requirements).

Other EPA programs also provide protection for groundwater. The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) boasts an underground injection control (UIC) program and a sole source aquifer (SSA) program to protect groundwater. The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) requires reporting of hazardous substance releases, including those that can reach groundwater.

The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) requires facilities that generate hazardous waste to take steps to prevent releases to the environment, including secondary containment requirements and release reporting.

Clean Water Act & NPDES Training

Identify your responsibilities under the many US EPA water programs that impact industrial facilities—from oil spill reporting to NPDES permits, stormwater regulations, and more. The Clean Water Act and Safe Drinking Water Act Regulations Online Course is open for enrollment now!

Tags: Clean Water Act, EPA, groundwater, NPDES, WOTUS

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

Convenient; I can train when I want, where I want.

Barry Cook

Hazmat Shipping Professional

Amazing instructor; real-life examples. Lion training gets better every year!

Frank Papandrea

Environmental Manager

The instructor kept the class engaged and made learning fun. There was a lot of information to cover but time flew by. I will definitely use Lion in the future!

Chelsea Minguela

Hazmat Shipping Professional

Convenient; I can train when I want, where I want.

Barry Cook

Hazmat Shipping Professional

Excellent class, super instructor, very easy to follow. No rushing through material. Would like to take his class again.

Lawrence Patterson

EH&S Facility Maintenance & Security Manager

Lion provided an excellent introduction to environmental regulations, making the transition to a new career as an EHS specialist less daunting of a task. Drinking from a fire hose when the flow of water is lessened, is much more enjoyable!

Stephanie Weathers

SHE Specialist

The price was reasonable, the time to complete the course was manageable, and the flexibility the online training allowed made it easy to complete.

Felicia Rutledge

Hazmat Shipping Professional

Lion courses are the standard to which all other workshops should strive for!

Brody Saleen

Registered Environmental Health Specialist

The instructor was energetic and made learning fun compared to dry instructors from other training providers.

Andy D’Amato

International Trade Compliance Manager

Excellent job. Made what is very dry material interesting. Thoroughly explained all topics in easy-to-understand terms.

David Hertvik

Vice President

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Explore ten hazardous waste management errors that caused generators in California the most trouble last year.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.