PHMSA Denies Appeals to New Class 3 Rail Rules
In the November 18, 2015, Federal Register, the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) officially responded to appeals from hazmat, chemical, and railroad industry groups regarding the May 2015 Final Rule to enhance tank car standards and operational controls for trains carrying Class 3 flammable liquids.
Click the link above to find out in the details of the Final Rule. Highlights include:
One major concern raised by industry groups is that shippers have little or no control over how the rail cars they offer are combined in a rail yard. A shipper may offer one tanker of crude oil, which does not trigger any additional braking or operational requirements. However, if this car is combined with many other cars carrying flammable liquids, it may trigger new requirements.
Therefore, at the time shippers offer the shipment, they have no way to know whether the tanker they use will be sufficient to ensure compliance. The only way to truly ensure compliance would be to either retrofit up to 40,000 existing DOT-111 specification tank cars to meet the new requirements or replace them with new, compliant DOT-117 tank cars, industry groups argued.
Groups like the Dangerous Goods Advisory Council, American Chemistry Council, Association of American Railroads, and the American Fuel and Petrochemicals Manufacturers all raised concerns, including the one detailed above.
PHMSA’s Response
In short, PHMSA disagrees with the points raised by industry groups, stating “[w]hile we respect the argument that both shippers and carriers of Class 3 flammable liquids by rail will face new challenges in the wake of these regulations, we maintain that they are capable of working together to comply with the requirements established by the Final Rule.”
PHMSA maintains that through “fleet management” rail yards can organize and combine rail cars in a way to maintain compliance with the provisions of the Final Rule.
Read PHMSA’s full denial of industry group’s appeals in the Federal Register.
Expert 49 CFR Hazmat Shipper Training
Get up to speed with the latest hazmat shipping regulations for ground, air, and ocean with interactive hazmat workshops, online courses, and webinars at Lion.com. For hazmat shipping managers and personnel, staying up to date with rule changes is critical; missing a single mandate can lead to rejected shipments, incidents in transit, and DOT fines up to $75,000 per day/violation. Per 49 CFR 172.704, hazmat employee training is required within 90 days for new employees and at least once every three years thereafter.
Click the link above to find out in the details of the Final Rule. Highlights include:
- Defining two new types of trains: High-Hazard Flammable Trains (HHFTs) and High-Hazard Flammable Unit Trains (HHFUTs)
- Restricting speed and requiring new braking technologies
- Bolstering design requirements and performance criteria
- New sampling, testing, and classification criteria for certain petroleum products
One major concern raised by industry groups is that shippers have little or no control over how the rail cars they offer are combined in a rail yard. A shipper may offer one tanker of crude oil, which does not trigger any additional braking or operational requirements. However, if this car is combined with many other cars carrying flammable liquids, it may trigger new requirements.
Therefore, at the time shippers offer the shipment, they have no way to know whether the tanker they use will be sufficient to ensure compliance. The only way to truly ensure compliance would be to either retrofit up to 40,000 existing DOT-111 specification tank cars to meet the new requirements or replace them with new, compliant DOT-117 tank cars, industry groups argued.
Groups like the Dangerous Goods Advisory Council, American Chemistry Council, Association of American Railroads, and the American Fuel and Petrochemicals Manufacturers all raised concerns, including the one detailed above.
PHMSA’s Response
In short, PHMSA disagrees with the points raised by industry groups, stating “[w]hile we respect the argument that both shippers and carriers of Class 3 flammable liquids by rail will face new challenges in the wake of these regulations, we maintain that they are capable of working together to comply with the requirements established by the Final Rule.”
PHMSA maintains that through “fleet management” rail yards can organize and combine rail cars in a way to maintain compliance with the provisions of the Final Rule.
Read PHMSA’s full denial of industry group’s appeals in the Federal Register.
Expert 49 CFR Hazmat Shipper Training
Get up to speed with the latest hazmat shipping regulations for ground, air, and ocean with interactive hazmat workshops, online courses, and webinars at Lion.com. For hazmat shipping managers and personnel, staying up to date with rule changes is critical; missing a single mandate can lead to rejected shipments, incidents in transit, and DOT fines up to $75,000 per day/violation. Per 49 CFR 172.704, hazmat employee training is required within 90 days for new employees and at least once every three years thereafter.
Find a Post
Recent Posts
Compliance Archives
Download Our Latest Whitepaper
In-flight hazmat incidents can be disastrous. This guide gives 5 tips for first-time air shippers to consider before offering dangerous goods for transportation on passenger or cargo aircraft.
By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.