EPA Enforcement Roundup: Week of 11/7
Every day, facilities across the US receive Notices of Violation from Federal and State environmental agencies for alleged noncompliance with a wide variety of programs like the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts, chemical management and reporting regulations (TSCA, EPCRA, CERCLA, etc.), hazardous waste management and disposal standards (RCRA), and much more.
In January 2017, EPA raised its fines for noncompliance with major environmental programs. We hope that providing information about EPA enforcement cases will help you identify and fix noncompliance issues that could leave your company facing costly penalties and future liability.
In addition to a $300 million settlement with a major oil and gas company for alleged Clean Air Act violations, in this week’s EPA enforcement roundup, EPA fined two companies for Clean Air Act violations and a university for improper disposal of PCB-contaminated waste.
In addition to paying a $2.5 million civil penalty for Clean Air Act violations, a Denver oil and gas exploration and production firm will spend nearly $20 million on system upgrades, improved maintenance and monitoring, and inspections.
The settlement resolves claims that the company “failed to adequately design, size, operate, and maintain vapor control systems” on storage tanks which emitted volatile organic compounds (VOCs).
See the Consent Decree here.
For allegedly disposing of waste containing polychlorinated biphenyls in violation of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) a Connecticut University will pay a civil penalty and take steps to ensure waste is disposed of properly.
The PCBs in question came from window caulk in the soil following a remediation project. This “PCB remediation wastes” must be disposed of at an approved facility. In this case, the waste was not identified properly on the Manifest, and therefore was shipped to a disposal facility not authorized to accept the PCB waste.
For alleged violations of Clean Air Act New Source Performance Standards (NSPS), a Massachusetts sand and gravel company will pay a six-figure civil penalty and replace equipment (combustion engines) that emit hazardous air pollutants.
Replacing the engines, according to EPA’s announcement, will help the facility reduce emissions of hazardous air pollutants like formaldehyde.
Managing site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERLCA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field, or need an update on changing EPA rules, the Complete Environmental Regulations Online Course will help you quickly build in-depth expertise.
Or, check out the latest individual EPA compliance training options here:
Clean Air Act Regulations Online
TSCA Regulations Online
Clean Water Act & SDWA Regulations Online
Superfund and Right-to-Know Act Regulations Online
The 2017 nationwide schedule for the Complete Environmental Regulations Workshop is now available. Collaborate with other managers to identify the requirements that apply to your facility, ask the right questions, and make the right decisions about EPA compliance.
In January 2017, EPA raised its fines for noncompliance with major environmental programs. We hope that providing information about EPA enforcement cases will help you identify and fix noncompliance issues that could leave your company facing costly penalties and future liability.
In addition to a $300 million settlement with a major oil and gas company for alleged Clean Air Act violations, in this week’s EPA enforcement roundup, EPA fined two companies for Clean Air Act violations and a university for improper disposal of PCB-contaminated waste.
WHO: A natural gas and oil company
WHERE: Denver, Colorado
WHAT: Clean Air Act emissions violations
HOW MUCH: $2.5 million
In addition to paying a $2.5 million civil penalty for Clean Air Act violations, a Denver oil and gas exploration and production firm will spend nearly $20 million on system upgrades, improved maintenance and monitoring, and inspections.The settlement resolves claims that the company “failed to adequately design, size, operate, and maintain vapor control systems” on storage tanks which emitted volatile organic compounds (VOCs).
See the Consent Decree here.
WHO: A university
WHERE: Storrs, CT
WHAT: Improper PCB disposal
HOW MUCH: $28,125
For allegedly disposing of waste containing polychlorinated biphenyls in violation of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) a Connecticut University will pay a civil penalty and take steps to ensure waste is disposed of properly. The PCBs in question came from window caulk in the soil following a remediation project. This “PCB remediation wastes” must be disposed of at an approved facility. In this case, the waste was not identified properly on the Manifest, and therefore was shipped to a disposal facility not authorized to accept the PCB waste.
WHO: A sand and gravel company
WHERE: Blackstone and Northborough, Massachusetts
WHAT: Clean Air Act emissions violations
HOW MUCH: $120,000
For alleged violations of Clean Air Act New Source Performance Standards (NSPS), a Massachusetts sand and gravel company will pay a six-figure civil penalty and replace equipment (combustion engines) that emit hazardous air pollutants.Replacing the engines, according to EPA’s announcement, will help the facility reduce emissions of hazardous air pollutants like formaldehyde.
20+ Hours of EHS Manager Training - Available Anytime, Anywhere
Managing site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERLCA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field, or need an update on changing EPA rules, the Complete Environmental Regulations Online Course will help you quickly build in-depth expertise.Or, check out the latest individual EPA compliance training options here:
Clean Air Act Regulations Online
TSCA Regulations Online
Clean Water Act & SDWA Regulations Online
Superfund and Right-to-Know Act Regulations Online
The 2017 nationwide schedule for the Complete Environmental Regulations Workshop is now available. Collaborate with other managers to identify the requirements that apply to your facility, ask the right questions, and make the right decisions about EPA compliance.
Find a Post
Recent Posts
Compliance Archives
Download Our Latest Whitepaper
Hazardous materials shipment rejections bear a big cost. Use this guide to end operational and logistical disruptions that severely impact your bottom line.
By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.