Search

Two Proposed TSCA Rules Dramatically Updated

Posted on 11/28/2022 by Roger Marks

In the past two weeks, US EPA has proposed substantial updates to two Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) rules proposed in 2021.

On November 16, EPA proposed to increase the fees that chemical manufacturers, importers, and processors pay for certain activities under TSCA (among other changes).

On November 25, EPA posted notice of dramatically revised cost estimates for a proposed rule that would require reporting of PFAS chemical manufacturing and import data. 

TSCA User Fees Rule

In 2018, EPA established TSCA User Fees for chemical manufacturers and others to defray some of the agency's costs to evaluate and regulate chemicals under TSCA.

TSCA requires EPA to review and adjust (if necessary) these fees every three years. In January 2021, EPA proposed a rule to adjust the fees, add fee categories, and create exemptions for certain activities.

In a supplemental notice to the January 2021 proposal, EPA proposes to revise the rule in ways that would, among other revisions:

  • Increase the fee amounts collected from chemical industry stakeholders,
  • Narrow the proposed exemption for producers of a substance as a byproduct, and
  • Extend fee obligations for TSCA Section 4 activities to cover more manufacturers.  

The supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking was published to the Federal Register on November 16, 2022. The notice includes details about the costs of implementing TSCA, EPA’s rationale for increasing the user fees, and a table that summarizes proposed fee adjustments (“Table 5”). TSCA user fees were adjusted for inflation, effective January 1, 2022.

EPA's proposed TSCA fee increases are as follows:

Fee category

Current fee Proposed fee
Test orders $11,650 $25,000
Test rule $35,080 $50,000
Enforceable consent agreement $27,110 $50,000
PMN (and others) $19,020 $45,000
EPA-initiated risk evaluation $2,560,000 $5,081,000
 

Fees for manufacturer-requested risk evaluations will increase significantly under the updated proposal as well, as shown on Table 5 in the November 16 notice (p. 68654).

EPA will accept comments on the revised proposal until January 17, 2023.

TSCA PFAS Reporting Rule  

EPA proposed a rule to require reporting of PFAS manufacturing and import data under TSCA in June 2021. The rule establishes reporting and recordkeeping requirements for any person who manufactured or imported a PFAS chemical, a mixture containing a PFAS, or an article containing PFAS in any year since 2011. 

When they published the proposed rule, EPA certified that the rule would not have a substantial economic impact on small businesses.

But after reviewing more than one hundred public comments about the proposal and meeting with small business stakeholders, EPA realized that the “social cost” of the PFAS reporting rule—that is, the total burden a regulation imposes on the economy—would be far greater than they anticipated.

In a notice published to the Federal Register on Friday, November 25, EPA shared an updated economic analysis for the proposed rule. This includes a dramatic increase to the estimated “social cost” of the proposed rule—from $10.8 million to $875 million.

EPA also updated its analysis of the rule’s impact on small businesses. The agency now says that small businesses would face more than $860 million in costs to meet the proposed reporting requirements for PFAS chemicals.

EPA will accept public comments on the updated economic analysis and an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) until December 27, 2022.

Two Proposed TSCA Rules Dramatically Updated

Online TSCA Regulations Training 

The TSCA Regulations Online Course guides chemical industry professionals through the chemical management, reporting, and recordkeeping requirements they must know to achieve and maintain compliance with the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). 
 

Tags: chemicals, environmental compliance, PFAS, TSCA

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

This is the best RCRA training I've experienced! I will be visiting Lion training again.

Cynthia L. Logsdon

Principal Environmental Engineer

This was the 1st instructor that has made the topic actually enjoyable and easy to follow and understand. Far better than the "other" training providers our company has attended!

Lori Hardy

Process & Resource Administrator

Excellent. I learned more in two days with Lion than at a 5-day program I took with another provider.

Francisco Gallardo

HES Technician

I have been to other training companies, but Lion’s material is much better and easier to understand.

Mark Abell

Regional Manager

The instructor does a great job at presenting material in an approachable way. I have been able to save my company about $30,000 in the last year with what I have learned from Lion!

Curtis Ahonen

EHS&S Manager

Convenient; I can train when I want, where I want.

Barry Cook

Hazmat Shipping Professional

The instructor was very patient and engaging - willing to answer and help explain subject matter.

Misty Filipp

Material Control Superintendent

I can take what I learned in this workshop and apply it to everyday work and relate it to my activities.

Shane Hersh

Materials Handler

Having the tutorial buttons for additional information was extremely beneficial.

Sharon Ziemek

EHS Manager

The training was impressive. I am not a fan of online training but this was put together very well. I would recommend Lion to others.

Donnie James

Quality Manager

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Spot and correct 4 of the most common universal waste errors before they result in a notice of violation during a Federal or state inspection.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.