Search

PHMSA Proposes Bolstered Hazmat Pipeline Requirements

Posted on 10/12/2015 by Roger Marks

In the October 12, 2015 Federal Register, the US DOT Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) proposed changes to the regulations for pipelines that carry liquid hazardous materials.

Among the changes for hazmat pipelines, EPA proposes to:
  • Expand the reporting requirements for all hazardous liquid gravity and gathering lines;
  • Require inspections of pipelines in areas affected by extreme weather and natural disasters;
  • Require periodic inline integrity assessments of hazardous liquid pipelines locate outside of High-Consequence Areas (HCAs);
  • Require use of leak detection systems on hazardous liquid pipelines in all locations;
  • Modify provisions for pipeline repairs;
  • Require that all pipelines subject to the Integrity Management (IM) requirements be capable of accommodating inline inspection tools within 20 years, except in certain situations; and
  • Issue other “clarifying” amendments.
The proposed rule can be found in the Federal Register, here.

Hazmat pipeline regulated by PHMSA

What Are Gravity and Gathering Lines?

Gravity lines are pipelines that carry product by means of gravity. These lines are usually short and within “tank farms” or other facilities. However, some gravity lines are longer and can build up large amounts of pressure. PHMSA is proposing to add a requirement for operators of all gravity lines to comply with the requirements for submitting annual, safety-related condition and incident reports.

Pipeline “gathering lines” are lines that transport gases or liquids from the source to a processing facility, refinery, or other pipeline. Most gathering lines are found in sparsely populated rural areas and therefore were left unregulated by previous hazmat laws. The new proposed rule will require operators of all gathering lines (onshore, offshore, regulated, or unregulated) to comply with requirements for annual, safety-related condition and incident reports.

Requiring Inspections After Extreme Weather and Natural Disasters

Extreme weather—flooding, hurricanes, and more—have been shown to contribute to pipeline failures and releases. For example, in 2011, after extensive flooding near Laurel, Montana, a pipeline failed and released crude oil into the Yellowstone River.

PHMSA is proposing to require operators to perform an additional inspection within 72 hours of the end of an extreme weather event, or as soon as the area can be safely accessed. If an issue is discovered while performing this inspection, the operator must take actions to remedy the situation and inform the public of any threat.

For a full description of the other elements in PHMSA’s proposed hazmat pipeline rulemaking, read the proposal in the Federal Register here.

Tags: DOT, hazmat shipping, new rules

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

This was the 1st instructor that has made the topic actually enjoyable and easy to follow and understand. Far better than the "other" training providers our company has attended!

Lori Hardy

Process & Resource Administrator

Lion courses always set the bar for content, reference, and practical application. Membership and access to the experts is an added bonus.

John Brown, CSP

Director of Safety & Env Affairs

Excellent course. Very interactive. Explanations are great whether you get the questions wrong or right.

Gregory Thompson

Environmental, Health & Safety Regional Manager

The instructor made the class very enjoyable and catered to the needs of our group.

Sarah Baker

Planner

Well designed and thorough program. Excellent summary of requirements with references. Inclusion of regulations in hard copy form, as well as full electronic with state pertinent regulations included is a great bonus!

Oscar Fisher

EHS Manager

The instructor was energetic and made learning fun compared to dry instructors from other training providers.

Andy D’Amato

International Trade Compliance Manager

The workshop covered a lot of information without being too overwhelming. Lion is much better, more comprehensive than other training providers.

George Alva

Manufacturing Manager

Lion is at the top of the industry in compliance training. Course content and structure are updated frequently to make annual re-training enjoyable. I like that Lion has experts that I can contact for 1 year after the training.

Caroline Froning

Plant Chemist

My experience with Lion training, both online and in the classroom, is that they are far better organized and provide a better sequential explanation of the material.

Robert Roose

Manager, Dangerous Goods Transportation

Lion is easily and consistently the best option for compliance training. I've learned new information from every instructor I've had.

Rachel Mathis

EHS Specialist

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Ace hazmat inspections. Protect personnel. Defend against civil and criminal penalties. How? See the self-audit "best practices" for hazardous materials shippers.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.