Search

EPA Enforcement Roundup: Week of 10/21

Posted on 10/21/2019 by Lauren Scott

Every day, facilities across the US receive Notices of Violation from US EPA for alleged noncompliance with a wide variety of programs like the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts, chemical management and reporting regulations (TSCA, EPCRA, CERCLA, etc.), hazardous waste management and disposal standards (RCRA), and much more.

Below are examples of recent EPA enforcement actions that provide insight into how and why EPA issues civil penalties to facilities for environmental noncompliance. Names of companies and individuals cited by EPA are withheld to protect their privacy.
 
WHO: A pharmaceutical chemical manufacturer
WHERE: Newburyport, MA
WHAT: RCRA violations
HOW MUCH: $52,210 plus a $152,000 Supplementary Environmental Project
EPA has reached a settlement with a New England chemical production facility over alleged hazardous waste violations dating back to 2017. EPA claims four of the company’s hazardous waste tanks failed to comply with regulations designed to prevent hazardous waste releases and failed to comply with hazardous waste air emission standards for these tanks.
The facility has agreed to pay the fine and plant 63 trees in Newburyport as part of a supplemental project designed to reduce air pollution in the area.
 
WHO: A regional supermarket chain
WHERE: Commerce, CA
WHAT: Clean Air Act violations
HOW MUCH: $168,043
A grocer-owned dairy processing facility has come under scrutiny for alleged violations of the Clean Air Act’s Risk Management Plan. EPA alleges that the facility lacked proper safety requirements, mechanical integrity program, documentation of personnel training, and follow-up on compliance audit findings.
EPA also found that the facility lacked necessary signs and labels; lacked auditory or visual alarms to alert employees of an ammonia release; and had inadequate emergency response measures, including ammonia detectors and emergency ventilation override switches.
 
WHO: An agricultural supply company
WHERE: San Luis, AZ
WHAT: FIFRA violations
HOW MUCH: $19,016
A seed and pesticide distributer allegedly attempted to import 972 containers of an unregistered pesticide to an Arizona facility, according to EPA. This is a violation of the Federal Insecticide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), which ensures that pesticides are used, stored, and disposed of safely.
FIFRA requires pesticide importers to report any new pesticides entering the U.S. by submitting Notice of Arrival forms to EPA for review before they enter the country. The information provided helps EPA decide whether a pesticide may pose unreasonable risks to public health or the environment. 
 

Convenient, Effective Online EHS Manager Training

Managing site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERLCA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field, or need an update on changing EPA rules, online training is a convenient way to quickly build in-depth expertise.

Check out the latest EPA compliance training options here:
 
Clean Air Act Regulations Online
TSCA Regulations Online
New! Clean Water Act & SDWA Regulations Online
Just Launched! Superfund and Right-to-Know Act Regulations Online 
 
The 2019 nationwide schedule, now with 2020 dates, for the Complete Environmental Regulations Workshop is available online. Collaborate with other managers to identify the requirements that apply to your facility, ask the right questions, and make the right decisions about EPA compliance.
 

Tags: Clean Air Act, enforcement, EPA, EPA Enforcement Roundup, FIFRA, fines, fungicide, hazardous waste, insecticide, penalties, pesticide, RCRA

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

The instructor was probably the best I ever had! He made the class enjoyable, was humorous at times, and very knowledgeable.

Mary Sue Michon

Environmental Administrator

The instructor created a great learning environment.

Avinash Thummadi

CAD & Environmental Manager

This training broke down the regulations in an easy-to-understand manner and made them less overwhelming. I now feel I have the knowledge to make more informed decisions.

Amanda Oswald

Shipping Professional

The price was reasonable, the time to complete the course was manageable, and the flexibility the online training allowed made it easy to complete.

Felicia Rutledge

Hazmat Shipping Professional

I was recently offered an opportunity to take my training through another company, but I politely declined. I only attend Lion Technology workshops.

Stephanie Gilliam

Material Production/Logistics Manager

I used the IT support number available and my issue was resolved within a few minutes. I don't see anything that could have made it better.

Danny Province

EHS Professional

The training was impressive. I am not a fan of online training but this was put together very well. I would recommend Lion to others.

Donnie James

Quality Manager

The online course was well thought out and organized, with good interaction between the student and the course.

Larry Ybarra

Material Release Agent

The course was very informative and presented in a way that was easily understood and remembered. I would recommend this course.

Jeffrey Tierno

Hazmat Shipping Professional

The instructor was very dedicated to providing a quality experience. She did her best to make sure students were really comprehending the information.

Stephanie Venn

Inventory Control Specialist

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Use this guide to spot which tanks and substances are regulated under EPA's Underground Storage Tank program, and which are excluded as of October 2018.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.