Lion will be closed on Monday, May 25. For online training support, please contact support@lion.com.
Search

OSHA Enforcement Roundup: Week of 10/23

Posted on 10/23/2023 by Nick Waldron

The OSH Act of 1970 requires US employers to provide a safe, healthy workplace for every employee. Failure to comply with applicable OSHA health & safety standards can easily lead to preventable injuries and fatal accidents at workplaces of all types.

The enforcement actions highlighted below provide insight into how and why OSHA issues citations for workplace safety violations. All violations discussed are alleged only unless we say otherwise.

We withhold the names of organizations and individuals subject to enforcement to protect their privacy. Check out OSHA’s latest list of the 10 most-cited safety Standards here.


A battery cell manufacturer in Warren, OH faces $270,091 in penalties for 19 alleged health and safety violations.

OSHA opened an investigation in response to safety complaints and an explosion at the Ohio facility, allegedly finding 19 health and safety violations—17 serious, and two other-than-serious.

Workers were allegedly exposed to hazards due to a failure to provide training on safety procedures related to energy control (i.e., lockout/tagout) and emergency response procedures related to the potential release of the chemical N-Methylpyrrolidone (NMP). The employer also violated the Hazard Communication Standard (HCS), OSHA says, by failing to provide Safety Data Sheets for hazardous chemicals and label chemical containers.

In the settlement, the Agency proposed $270,091 in penalties and additionally asked the facility to “reduce accumulations of metal dust and protect employees from unsafe metal dust exposure.”


A Tulsa, OK metal fabricator faces $275,890 in penalties following an inspection covered by a Regional Emphasis Program.

OSHA opened three investigations following an April 2023 incident at the manufacturing facility. Investigators allege that they found 36 violations, many of which are considered serious in nature.

Serious violations identified by investigators include failing to install required machine guards; failing to have an energy-control program or provide related training; and not ensuring electrical equipment was maintained properly and in safe operating condition. OSHA found that the company failed the OSH Act General Duty Clause, and the facility faces a total of $275,890 in penalties.


Federal investigators allege employees were exposed to toxic beryllium at an advanced alloys manufacturing facility in Wilmington, MA.

Employees at the facility perform handheld grinding and parts fabrication on beryllium components, activities that cause beryllium to go airborne where it can contact skin or be inhaled with dust and cause health effects.

OSHA claims the employer overexposed employees to airborne concentrations of beryllium, and failed to mitigate these hazards, in part by not doing the following:

  • Conduct follow-up beryllium exposure monitoring in a timely manner.
  • Implement a proper exposure control plan and maintain adequate engineering controls to reduce and minimize employees’ exposure to beryllium.
  • Keep workbench surfaces as free of beryllium as practicable.

The employer faces $69,251 in proposed penalties, and was cited for 11 serious violations and one other-than-serious violation.


Online Training: Get to Know OSHA's Rules

Lion’s 10 Hour OSHA General Industry Online Course introduces new safety managers to a wide range of the most common workplace health & safety standards for general industry: hazard communication, providing PPE, fire extinguishers, forklifts, fall prevention, and much more.

Tags: osha, OSHA Enforcement Roundup

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

Excellent job. Made what is very dry material interesting. Thoroughly explained all topics in easy-to-understand terms.

David Hertvik

Vice President

The exercises in the DOT hazardous materials management course are especially helpful in evaluating your understanding of course information.

Morgan Bliss

Principal Industrial Hygienist

Lion does a great job summarizing and communicating complicated EH&S-related regulations.

Michele Irmen

Sr. Environmental Engineer

I love that the instructor emphasized the thought process behind the regs.

Rebecca Saxena

Corporate Product Stewardship Specialist

The instructor was very very informative, helpful, understandable and pleasant. This course answered many questions I had, being new to this industry.

Frances Mona

Shipping Manager

My experience with Lion classes has always been good. Lion Technology always covers the EPA requirements I must follow.

Steven Erlandson

Environmental Coordinator

Attending Lion Technology classes should be mandatory for every facility that ships or stores hazmat.

Genell Drake

Outbound Lead

Very well structured, comprehensive, and comparable to live training seminars I've participated in previously. I will recommend the online course to other colleagues with training requirement needs.

Neil Luciano

EHS Manager

The price was reasonable, the time to complete the course was manageable, and the flexibility the online training allowed made it easy to complete.

Felicia Rutledge

Hazmat Shipping Professional

My experience with Lion training, both online and in the classroom, is that they are far better organized and provide a better sequential explanation of the material.

Robert Roose

Manager, Dangerous Goods Transportation

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Use this guide to spot which tanks and substances are regulated under EPA's Underground Storage Tank program, and which are excluded as of October 2018.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.