Search

Common Chemical Reporting Forms

Posted on 9/9/2014 by Anthony R. Cardno

Before a manufacturer or importer can make or import a new chemical substance, the business must submit information to the US EPA for review. Once EPA has reviewed the chemical and added it to the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) master inventory list, manufacture or import can begin and the chemical can be distributed in commerce. While this requirement mostly applies to initial manufacturers or importers of new chemicals, TSCA establishes notification requirements and restrictions for manufacturing existing chemicals as well.
 
Pre-Manufacture Notice (PMN)
 
The initial manufacturer of a chemical not already listed on TSCA’s master inventory must go through the Pre-Manufacture Notification (PMN) process. This involves submitting a PMN and waiting through a 90-day review period during which EPA looks for certain red flags that raise concern about the chemical’s environmental or health effects. The review results in one of three outcomes:
 
  • No Action — the substance can be manufactured or imported without any restrictions
  • Prohibition — the substance cannot be manufactured in or imported into the United States
  • Consent Order — a formal agreement between the manufacturer/importer and EPA that prohibits or limits some activities involving the substance.
 
If subject to a Consent Order, limited or prohibited activities can include manufacture, import, processing, distribution, use, or disposal of the chemical, and the manufacturer will be required to inform customers of these limitations. However, the consent order is only binding on the initial manufacturer/importer. So what about other companies that might decide to manufacture or import the same chemical?
 
The Significant New Use Rule (SNUR)
 
The Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) is EPA’s mechanism for applying the limitations or prohibitions of the consent order to subsequent manufacturers, importers, or processors. For each substance on the master inventory, EPA establishes criteria for what constitutes a “significant new use.” Criteria can include, but are not limited to:
 
  • Uses that require specified personal protection
  • Uses where a specified hazard communication program has not been developed
  • Specific types of industrial, commercial, or consumer uses
  • Uses resulting in incineration or land disposal
  • Uses resulting in release to the water
The specific uses considered “significant” are identified for each chemical in 40 CFR 721, Subpart E.
 
EHS managers chemical reporting
 
Significant New Use Notification (SNUN)
 
Each subsequent manufacturer, importer, or processor of a chemical subject to a SNUR must submit a Significant New Use Notification (SNUN) to EPA on Form 7710-25 at least 90 days prior to beginning manufacture, import, or processing. This is the same form and the same 90-day review period used for the PMN. As with most TSCA paperwork, EPA will only accept electronic submissions of SNUNs through the Central Data Exchange.
 
New SNURs
 
As new chemicals subject to consent orders are added to the master inventory, EPA also adds SNURs for those chemicals to 40 CFR 721, Subpart E. These new SNURs are announced in the Federal Register, most recently on July 8th and July 9th of 2014.
 
TSCA reporting violations are a common reason chemical manufacturers face EPA fines. Be confident you know the latest TSCA rules that apply to the chemicals you manufacture, import, or use. Get live, instructor-led training at the TSCA: Chemical Reporting & Recordkeeping Webinar on October 23, from 1-3 p.m. ET. Prefer to train at your own pace? Enroll in the TSCA Regulations Online Course, available 24/7. 
 

Tags: and, recordkeeping, reporting, TSCA

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

The course is well thought out and organized in a way that leads to a clearer understanding of the total training.

David Baily

Hazmat Shipping Professional

I was able to present my scenario to the instructor and worked thru the regulations together. In the past, I attended another training firm's classes. Now, I have no intention of leaving Lion!

Diana Joyner

Senior Environmental Engineer

If I need thorough training or updating, I always use Lion. Lion is always the best in both instruction and materials.

Bryce Parker

EHS Manager

Very witty instructor, made the long times sitting bearable. One of the few training courses I can say I actually enjoyed.

John Hutchinson

Senior EHS Engineer

The instructor took a rather drab set of topics and brought them to life with realistic real-life examples.

Tom Berndt

HSE Coordinator

The instructor was very dedicated to providing a quality experience. She did her best to make sure students were really comprehending the information.

Stephanie Venn

Inventory Control Specialist

I will never go anywhere, but to Lion Technology.

Dawn Swofford

EHS Technician

Given the choice, I would do all coursework this way. In-person courses go very fast without the opportunity to pause or repeat anything.

Ellen Pelton

Chemical Laboratory Manager

Having the tutorial buttons for additional information was extremely beneficial.

Sharon Ziemek

EHS Manager

My experience with Lion training, both online and in the classroom, is that they are far better organized and provide a better sequential explanation of the material.

Robert Roose

Manager, Dangerous Goods Transportation

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Tips to identify and manage universal waste under more-stringent state regulations for generators and universal waste handlers in California.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.