EPA Enforcement Roundup: Week of 9/27

Posted on 9/27/2021 by Lauren Scott

Every day, facilities across the US receive Notices of Violation from US EPA for alleged noncompliance with a wide variety of programs like the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts; chemical management and reporting regulations (TSCA, EPCRA, CERCLA, etc.); hazardous waste management and disposal standards (RCRA); and much more.

Below are examples of recent EPA enforcement actions that provide insight into how and why EPA issues civil penalties to facilities for environmental noncompliance. Names of companies and individuals cited by EPA are withheld to protect their privacy.

WHO: A waste-to-energy facility
WHERE: Dakota City, NE
WHAT: Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act violations
HOW MUCH: $1.1 million

According to EPA, an energy plant released hazardous amounts of biomass and biogas on at least 16 occasions between 2017 and 2019. One malfunction in 2018 accidentally released 80,000 gallons of biomass overflowing from the digesters. Specific alleged violations include failure to control accidental releases of extremely hazardous substances, failure to comply with air and water permits, and unauthorized discharges into local water bodies.

The state of Nebraska revoked the facility’s Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act permits in 2019. Later in 2019, the facility stopped accepting waste and has since ceased operations.

WHO: A steel forge
WHERE: Chicago, IL
WHAT: EPCRA violations
HOW MUCH: $165,197

EPA recently announced a settlement with a steel manufacturer to resolve alleged violations of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA). EPA alleged that the facility violated EPCRA by failing to submit required forms regarding the releases and transfers of substances including chromium, nickel, ethylene glycol, and manganese.

Under the terms of the consent agreement and final order with EPA, the company has addressed the alleged EPCRA violations at the facility and will pay a civil penalty of $165,197 to the Federal government.

WHO: A glass bottle manufacturer
WHERE: Portland, OR
WHAT: EPCRA violations
HOW MUCH: $38,900

A company that makes glass bottles violated EPCRA’s Toxic Release Inventory provisions when it allegedly failed to report information about toxic chromium compounds at its Portland facility. The plant uses iron chromite to make green glass. When super-heated in a furnace, iron chromite produces new chromium compounds, which are then incorporated into green glass bottles.

EPA found that in 2017 and 2018, the company failed to file required reports indicating it manufactured and processed chromium compounds in quantities that exceeded the threshold reporting amounts of 25,000 pounds.

Convenient, Effective Online EHS Manager Training

Managing site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERLCA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field or need an update on changing EPA rules, online training is a convenient way to quickly build in-depth expertise.

Check out the latest EPA compliance training options here:
Complete Environmental Regulations
Clean Air Act Regulations Online
TSCA Regulations Online
Clean Water Act & SDWA Regulations Online
Superfund and Right-to-Know Act Regulations Online 

Tags: Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, environmental compliance, EPA, EPA Enforcement Roundup, EPCRA, fines, penalties

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

Excellent job. Made what is very dry material interesting. Thoroughly explained all topics in easy-to-understand terms.

David Hertvik

Vice President

Lion is at the top of the industry in compliance training. Course content and structure are updated frequently to make annual re-training enjoyable. I like that Lion has experts that I can contact for 1 year after the training.

Caroline Froning

Plant Chemist

Given the choice, I would do all coursework this way. In-person courses go very fast without the opportunity to pause or repeat anything.

Ellen Pelton

Chemical Laboratory Manager

The instructor made the class very enjoyable and catered to the needs of our group.

Sarah Baker


The instructor took a rather drab set of topics and brought them to life with realistic real-life examples.

Tom Berndt

HSE Coordinator

Excellent class, super instructor, very easy to follow. No rushing through material. Would like to take his class again.

Lawrence Patterson

EH&S Facility Maintenance & Security Manager

I really enjoyed this training. Even after years on both sides of the comprehension coin, I find myself still learning! The quality of the delivery exceeded much of the training I have received in the past.

Neil Ozonur

Safety Officer

Course instructor was better prepared and presented better than other trainers. Course manual and references were easier to use as well.

Marty Brownfield

Hazardous Waste Professional

These are the best commercial course references I have seen (10+ years). Great job!

Ed Grzybowski

EHS & Facility Engineer

Excellent course. Very interactive. Explanations are great whether you get the questions wrong or right.

Gregory Thompson

Environmental, Health & Safety Regional Manager

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

What to do before, during, and after a RCRA hazardous waste inspection to defend your site from rising State and Federal penalties.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.