Search

EPA Enforcement Roundup: Week of 9/27

Posted on 9/27/2021 by Lauren Scott

Every day, facilities across the US receive Notices of Violation from US EPA for alleged noncompliance with a wide variety of programs like the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts; chemical management and reporting regulations (TSCA, EPCRA, CERCLA, etc.); hazardous waste management and disposal standards (RCRA); and much more.

Below are examples of recent EPA enforcement actions that provide insight into how and why EPA issues civil penalties to facilities for environmental noncompliance. Names of companies and individuals cited by EPA are withheld to protect their privacy.
 

WHO: A waste-to-energy facility
WHERE: Dakota City, NE
WHAT: Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act violations
HOW MUCH: $1.1 million

According to EPA, an energy plant released hazardous amounts of biomass and biogas on at least 16 occasions between 2017 and 2019. One malfunction in 2018 accidentally released 80,000 gallons of biomass overflowing from the digesters. Specific alleged violations include failure to control accidental releases of extremely hazardous substances, failure to comply with air and water permits, and unauthorized discharges into local water bodies.

The state of Nebraska revoked the facility’s Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act permits in 2019. Later in 2019, the facility stopped accepting waste and has since ceased operations.
 

WHO: A steel forge
WHERE: Chicago, IL
WHAT: EPCRA violations
HOW MUCH: $165,197

EPA recently announced a settlement with a steel manufacturer to resolve alleged violations of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA). EPA alleged that the facility violated EPCRA by failing to submit required forms regarding the releases and transfers of substances including chromium, nickel, ethylene glycol, and manganese.

Under the terms of the consent agreement and final order with EPA, the company has addressed the alleged EPCRA violations at the facility and will pay a civil penalty of $165,197 to the Federal government.
 

WHO: A glass bottle manufacturer
WHERE: Portland, OR
WHAT: EPCRA violations
HOW MUCH: $38,900

A company that makes glass bottles violated EPCRA’s Toxic Release Inventory provisions when it allegedly failed to report information about toxic chromium compounds at its Portland facility. The plant uses iron chromite to make green glass. When super-heated in a furnace, iron chromite produces new chromium compounds, which are then incorporated into green glass bottles.

EPA found that in 2017 and 2018, the company failed to file required reports indicating it manufactured and processed chromium compounds in quantities that exceeded the threshold reporting amounts of 25,000 pounds.
 

Convenient, Effective Online EHS Manager Training

Managing site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERLCA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field or need an update on changing EPA rules, online training is a convenient way to quickly build in-depth expertise.

Check out the latest EPA compliance training options here:
 
Complete Environmental Regulations
Clean Air Act Regulations Online
TSCA Regulations Online
Clean Water Act & SDWA Regulations Online
Superfund and Right-to-Know Act Regulations Online 
 

Tags: Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, environmental compliance, EPA, EPA Enforcement Roundup, EPCRA, fines, penalties

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

The instructor was very knowledgeable and provided pertinent information above and beyond the questions that were asked.

Johnny Barton

Logistics Coordinator

Excellent job. Made what is very dry material interesting. Thoroughly explained all topics in easy-to-understand terms.

David Hertvik

Vice President

The instructor took a rather drab set of topics and brought them to life with realistic real-life examples.

Tom Berndt

HSE Coordinator

I was able to present my scenario to the instructor and worked thru the regulations together. In the past, I attended another training firm's classes. Now, I have no intention of leaving Lion!

Diana Joyner

Senior Environmental Engineer

The instructor created a great learning environment.

Avinash Thummadi

CAD & Environmental Manager

I really enjoyed this training. Even after years on both sides of the comprehension coin, I find myself still learning! The quality of the delivery exceeded much of the training I have received in the past.

Neil Ozonur

Safety Officer

I have been to other training companies, but Lion’s material is much better and easier to understand.

Mark Abell

Regional Manager

The instructor made the class very enjoyable and catered to the needs of our group.

Sarah Baker

Planner

We have a very busy work schedule and using Lion enables us to take the course at our own time. It makes it easy for me to schedule my employees' training.

Timothy Mertes

Hazmat Shipping Professional

Excellent. I learned more in two days with Lion than at a 5-day program I took with another provider.

Francisco Gallardo

HES Technician

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Four key considerations to help you maximize the convenience and quality of your experience with online training.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.