Lion's office will be closed on Friday, July 4, in observance of Independence Day. For help with online training, please contact support@lion.com.
Search

TSCA Update: Revised Chemical Risk Determinations

Posted on 4/30/2024 by Roger Marks and Anthony Cardno, CHMM

TSCA Chemical Risk Evaluation Updates  


Asbestos (Part 2)

Final Risk Evaluation for Asbestos—Part 2 (November 2024)
Unreasonable risk? Yes—Health.

Part 1 of the risk evaluation for asbestos addressed chrysotile asbestos (the most common type) and resulted in a ban on ongoing uses that took effect in May 2024.  

Part 2 of the asbestos risk evaluation addresses other types of asbestos fibers, asbestos-containing talc, legacy uses, and associated disposal. EPA is required by a consent order to finalize Part 2 of the risk evaluation for asbestos before December 1, 2024. 


1,4-dioxane 

Final Supplemental Risk Evaluation for 1,4-dioxane (November 2024)
Unreasonable risk? Yes—Health. 

Released in 2020 and later revised, EPA's risk evaluation for 1,4-dioxane, finds that the chemical poses an unreasonable risk to workers under many of its conditions of use. 1,4-dioxane is a substance used primarily as a solvent. EPA expanded on the 2020 risk evaluation for 1,4-dioxane with a Supplement first published in July 2023.


Tris(2-chloroethyl) phosphate (TCEP)

Final Risk Evaluation (September 2024) 
Unreasonable risk? Yes—Health.
TCEP is used as a flame retardant and plasticizer in various applications including aerospace, automotive, and paints/coatings. In the past, TCEP was used in fabrics, textiles, foams, and some construction supplies. 


Trichloroethylene (TCE)

Final Revision to the Risk Determination (01/09/23) 
Unreasonable risk? Yes—Health.

The initial risk determination for TCE, released in November 2020, found unreasonable risk to workers, occupational non-users, consumers, and bystanders in 52 out of 54 use cases examined.


Carbon Tetrachloride

Final Revision to the Risk Determination (12/27/22) 
Unreasonable risk? Yes—Health.

Carbon Tetrachloride (CASRN 56-23-5) is known by different names in different industries—carbon tet, tetrachloromethane, Halon-104, or Refrigerant-10, for example. The chemical is a clear, sweet-smelling liquid used in refrigerants, aerosol propellants, degreasers, spot remover products, fire extinguishers, and insect fumigants. It was also used as a pesticide until 1986.


1-Bromopropane (1-BP)

Final Revision to the Risk Determination (12/19/22) 
Unreasonable risk? Yes—Health.

1-BP is commonly used as a solvent in vapor degreasing, dry cleaning, sealants, adhesives, and other similar activities. Use of 1-BP in the United States increased after US EPA approved it as a less-harmful replacement for ozone depleting substances (e.g., tetrachloroethylene) in 2007.


n-methylpyrrolidone (NMP)

Final Revision to the Risk Determination (12/19/22) 
Unreasonable risk? Yes—Health.

NMP is used in chemical manufacturing, petrochemical processing, and the electronics industry as a substitute for halogenated solvents. It is also used in the manufacturing of lithium batteries. EPA’s earlier risk determination found unreasonable risk to consumers, workers, and occupational non-users under some conditions of use. 


Perchloroethylene (PCE)

Final Revision to the Risk Determination (12/14/22) 
Unreasonable risk? Yes—Health.

PCE is a colorless liquid used mostly to produce fluorinated compounds for industrial gas manufacturing (e.g., HFCs and HCFCs). It’s also found in adhesives, brake cleaners, aerosol lubricants, sealants, and polishes.


CI Pigment Violet 29 (PV 29)

Final Revision to the Risk Determination (09/06/22) 
Unreasonable Risk? Yes—Health

Used to color materials and as an intermediate for high performance pigments, Color Index Pigment Violet 29 (PV 29) is used in car paints and coatings, commercial printing, and consumer watercolor paints.


Cyclic Aliphatic Bromide Cluster (HBCD)

Final Revision to the Risk Determination (06/29/22)
Unreasonable risk? Yes—Health and Environment.

Cyclic Aliphatic Bromide Cluster chemicals, namely hexabromocyclododecane or HBCD, are a class of flame retardants used in building materials, recycled plastics, and car parts. HBCD has been mostly substituted out of use in the US.


Methylene Chloride (MCL)

Final Revision to the Risk Determination (11/10/22) 
Unreasonable risk? Yes—Health.

The revised risk evaluation for MCL released in late 2022 finds that the chemical presents an unreasonable risk of injury to health. EPA lists many "conditions of use" that drive this unreasonable risk, including domestic manufacturing and import, processing, and re-packaging, as well as use in solvents, adhesives, paints and coatings, and more. 


EPA’s New, "Whole Chemical" Approach to TSCA Risk Evaluations

Posted 07/08/22

EPA is re-evaluating chemical risk assessments completed during the previous administration to, in their words, ensure they are based on sound science and law. Earlier risk determinations failed to sufficiently address risks to workers and the environment, EPA now says.

The updated risk determinations reflect EPA’s “whole chemical approach” to TSCA risk evaluations. EPA announced the major shift in its approach to risk evaluations about one year ago, in June 2021.

Previously, EPA made separate risk determinations for each condition of use of a chemical substance. Under the “whole chemical” approach, EPA considers all conditions of use at the same time, regardless of whether a specific use is regulated (or could be) under other environmental statutes (e.g., the Clean Air Act).

EPA also stresses that previously completed risk determinations wrongly assumed that employees who work with chemicals always wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE). That’s not true, EPA now believes. Some employers may fail to provide needed PPE to workers or fail to train personnel on PPE maintenance and use. Even when PPE is made available, it may not be adequate or used properly.

In addition, OSHA developed many of the permissible exposure limits (PELs) for hazardous chemicals decades ago. These PELs are now, in OSHA’s own words, “outdated and inadequate for ensuring protection of worker health.” Now when evaluating the risks of chemicals to workers, EPA does not assume that workers will use appropriate PPE.

EPA published a Final Rule on July 5 to align the TSCA regulations for “significant new uses” of chemical substances with OSHA’s Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) and make other revisions.

 

TSCA Regulations Online Course

Be confident you know how the "Lautenberg Law" and EPA's ongoing chemical risk evaluations will impact your responsibilities for chemical management, inventory reporting, and recordkeeping under TSCA.

The TSCA Regulations Online Course covers what professionals in the chemical manufacturing, import/export, storage, and processing fields must know to achieve and maintain TSCA compliance. 

Tags: chemicals, Lautenberg Law, TSCA

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

The workshop covered a lot of information without being too overwhelming. Lion is much better, more comprehensive than other training providers.

George Alva

Manufacturing Manager

This was the 1st instructor that has made the topic actually enjoyable and easy to follow and understand. Far better than the "other" training providers our company has attended!

Lori Hardy

Process & Resource Administrator

I had a positive experience utilizing this educational program. It was very informative, convenient, and rewarding from a career perspective.

John Gratacos

Logistics Manager

This is the best RCRA training I've experienced! I will be visiting Lion training again.

Cynthia L. Logsdon

Principal Environmental Engineer

Lion's online training is more comprehensive, has better slides, and is a superior training experience than what I would get from other trainers.

Robert Brenner

District Environmental Manager

The instructor had knowledge of regulations and understanding of real-world situations. The presentation style was engaging and fostered a positive atmosphere for information sharing.

Linda Arlen

Safety & Environmental Compliance Officer

Our instructor was very dynamic and kept everyone's interest. Hazmat shipping can be a dry, complicated topic but I was engaged the entire time.

Kimberly Arnao

Senior Director of EH&S

These are the best classes I attend each year. I always take something away and implement improvements at my sites.

Kim Racine

EH&S Manager

I tried other environmental training providers, but they were all sub-standard compared to Lion. I will not stray from Lion again!

Sara Sills

Environmental Specialist

The instructor was very very informative, helpful, understandable and pleasant. This course answered many questions I had, being new to this industry.

Frances Mona

Shipping Manager

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

This report details major changes for hazardous waste generators from US EPA’s Generator Improvements Rule, as well as the latest updates from states that are still working to adopt new, stricter Federal requirements.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.