Search

EPA Proposes Revisions to Tier II Reports

Posted on 8/11/2011 by James Griffin

For the first time in over 20 years, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing changes to the Tier I and Tier II chemical inventory reporting forms.
 
Under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986 (EPCRA), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires all facilities with an inventory of hazardous chemicals to file a Tier I or Tier II report each year with State and local emergency response planners.
 
Over the years, emergency response planners and other stakeholders have identified deficiencies in the existing reporting forms and have asked the EPA to make revisions in order for the Tier II reports to be “…more useful for State and local agencies and to better inform the public on chemical hazards in their communities.”
 
What New Elements Is the EPA Proposing?
 
Facility Emergency Coordinator
Regulated facilities are already supposed to designate a facility representative who will participate in the emergency response planning process with State and local authorities. The EPA is proposing that the identity of the emergency coordinator be included on the Tier II form.
 
Tier I and II Information Contacts
As it stands now, the Tier II report does not include a designated point of contact, which means that State and local emergency response planners have difficulty getting in touch with the person who prepared the Tier II report. If the intent of the Tier II reporting system is to force chemical storage facilities and emergency response planners to coordinate, the lack of a designated point of contact is a problem. Therefore, the EPA is proposing that each Tier II report include the name, title, and contact information of the person knowledgeable of or responsible for completing the Tier II report.
 
Emergency Planning
The Agency also intends for the new Tier II report to include data on whether the facility is subject to Emergency Planning requirements under Section 302 of EPCRA, or the Chemical Accident Risk Prevention or Risk Management Programs under the Clean Air Act.
 
What Data Elements Is the EPA Proposing Changes To?
 
Facility Identification
The EPA is proposing two additional data elements for identifying the owner/operator of a regulated facility. Firstly, in addition to the contact information for the facility proper, the EPA is now requesting the name, address, phone number, and Dun & Bradstreet of the facility’s parent company. Secondly, the EPA is adding a line for the reporting facility’s e-mail address.
 
New Range Codes for Inventories
The EPCRA statute requires that facilities give an estimate in ranges for the maximum and average amount of hazardous chemicals at a facility. As emergency responders consider the existing ranges too broad, the EPA is proposing a new set of ranges to provide more granularity.
 
Chemical Information for Mixtures
Because mixtures of hazardous chemicals can be reported as either the amount of mixture or the amount of hazardous chemical in the mixture, the EPA proposes to create separate entries in the Tier II report for mixtures and pure chemicals.
 
Storage Type/Condition
The Tier II form currently requires facilities to use code numbers to report how chemicals are stored (underground tank, drum, etc.) and under what conditions (temperature, pressure, etc.). The EPA proposes to eliminate the codes and have facilities simply report storage conditions descriptively.
 

Tags: EPA, EPCRA, new rules, reporting and recordkeeping

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

I have been to other training companies, but Lion’s material is much better and easier to understand.

Mark Abell

Regional Manager

Lion provided an excellent introduction to environmental regulations, making the transition to a new career as an EHS specialist less daunting of a task. Drinking from a fire hose when the flow of water is lessened, is much more enjoyable!

Stephanie Weathers

SHE Specialist

The instructor was excellent. They knew all of the material without having to read from a notepad or computer.

Gary Hartzell

Warehouse Supervisor

Excellent. I learned more in two days with Lion than at a 5-day program I took with another provider.

Francisco Gallardo

HES Technician

The instructor was energetic and made learning fun compared to dry instructors from other training providers.

Andy D’Amato

International Trade Compliance Manager

This was the 1st instructor that has made the topic actually enjoyable and easy to follow and understand. Far better than the "other" training providers our company has attended!

Lori Hardy

Process & Resource Administrator

I was able to present my scenario to the instructor and worked thru the regulations together. In the past, I attended another training firm's classes. Now, I have no intention of leaving Lion!

Diana Joyner

Senior Environmental Engineer

I will never go anywhere, but to Lion Technology.

Dawn Swofford

EHS Technician

Excellent class, super instructor, very easy to follow. No rushing through material. Would like to take his class again.

Lawrence Patterson

EH&S Facility Maintenance & Security Manager

Our instructor was very dynamic and kept everyone's interest. Hazmat shipping can be a dry, complicated topic but I was engaged the entire time.

Kimberly Arnao

Senior Director of EH&S

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

This guide will help you identify 25 of the most -cited errors in RCRA training, recordkeeping, hazardous waste ID, container management, universal waste, and laboratories.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.