Lion's office will be closed December 25 and 26. Online training support is available every day from 8:30 AM to 5 PM ET via support@lion.com.
Search

TSCA New Use Rule for 330 Inactive PFAS Proposed

Posted on 2/1/2023 by Lion Technology Inc.

Under a rule proposed last week, notification to US EPA would be required before manufacturing, importing, or processing for any use any of the 330 PFAS chemicals designated as Inactive on the TSCA Inventory.

The proposed Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) would apply to PFAS that are:

  • Designated as Inactive on the TSCA Inventory, and
  • Not subject to an existing SNUR.*

* Includes the SNURs at 40 CFR 721.9582 (“certain perfluoroalkyl sulfonates”) and 40 CFR 721.10536 (“long-chain perfluoroalkyl carboxylate chemical substances”)

EPA will accept public comments on the proposed TSCA SNUR until March 27, 2023.

When a substance is covered by a TSCA Significant New Use Rule, anyone who intends to manufacture, import, or process the covered substance/chemical “for a significant new use” must notify EPA 90 days before starting the activity.

Often, EPA includes details in the SNUR about what uses are considered “significant new uses.” A SNUR may say, for example, that “manufacturing or importing Chemical X for use as an additive in ski wax” is considered a significant new use. Anyone who wishes to manufacture/import/process/use that specific chemical for that specific use would be required to notify EPA 90 days in advance.

Other times, a SNUR can be more restrictive. In the rule proposed on January 26, EPA specifies manufacture (including import) or processing for any use as a significant new use. Therefore, anyone who wishes to manufacture/import/process one of the 330 inactive PFAS on the TSCA inventory would be required to notify EPA 90 days before commencing the activity.

Active vs. Inactive on the TSCA Inventory

The 330 PFAS covered by this proposed SNUR are “inactive” on the TSCA inventory, which means that none of them has been manufactured, imported, or processed for any purpose in the US since at least 2006.  

In 2016, EPA required certain facilities to provide data on chemical manufacturing and import data covering the ten years prior. The data was used to divide the TSCA inventory into those chemical substances that are “active” in the past ten years and those that are inactive.  

TSCA New Use Rule for 330 Inactive PFAS Proposed

Of the roughly 86,000 chemicals on the TSCA Inventory, about half (48%) are now deemed “active” in commerce.  

In 2021, EPA required PFAS manufacturers and importers to report ten years of chemical production, disposal, use, and safety data (2011—2021). That suggests the data EPA is using about which PFAS are being manufactured, imported, processed, or used in the US is relatively current.

Tags: environmental compliance, PFAS, Significant New Use Rule, TSCA, TSCA inventory

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

I tried other environmental training providers, but they were all sub-standard compared to Lion. I will not stray from Lion again!

Sara Sills

Environmental Specialist

Lion does a great job summarizing and communicating complicated EH&S-related regulations.

Michele Irmen

Sr. Environmental Engineer

The exercises in the DOT hazardous materials management course are especially helpful in evaluating your understanding of course information.

Morgan Bliss

Principal Industrial Hygienist

The instructor was great, explaining complex topics in terms that were easily understandable and answering questions clearly and thoroughly.

Brittany Holm

Lab Supervisor

I have over 26 years of environmental compliance experience, and it has been some time since I have attended an environmental regulations workshop. I attended this course as preparation for EHS Audits for my six plants, and it was exactly what I was looking for.

Frank Sizemore

Director of Regulatory Affairs

I have been to other training companies, but Lion’s material is much better and easier to understand.

Mark Abell

Regional Manager

I attended training from another provider and learned absolutely nothing. Lion is much better. Hands down.

Nicole Eby

Environmental Specialist

The instructor was excellent. They knew all of the material without having to read from a notepad or computer.

Gary Hartzell

Warehouse Supervisor

Lion is easily and consistently the best option for compliance training. I've learned new information from every instructor I've had.

Rachel Mathis

EHS Specialist

The course is well thought out and organized in a way that leads to a clearer understanding of the total training.

David Baily

Hazmat Shipping Professional

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Some limited quantity reliefs are reserved for specific modes of transport. Use this guide to identify which reliefs you can capitalize on, and which do not apply to your operations.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.