Search

EPA Enforcement Roundup: Week of 9/8

Posted on 9/8/2020 by Lauren Scott

Every day, facilities across the US receive Notices of Violation from US EPA for alleged noncompliance with a wide variety of programs like the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts; chemical management and reporting regulations (TSCA, EPCRA, CERCLA, etc.); hazardous waste management and disposal standards (RCRA); and much more.

Below are examples of recent EPA enforcement actions that provide insight into how and why EPA issues civil penalties to facilities for environmental noncompliance. Names of companies and individuals cited by EPA are withheld to protect their privacy.
 

WHO: A municipal utility company
WHERE: Petersburg, IN
WHAT: Clean Air Act violations
HOW MUCH: $1.5 million plus $5.3 million in supplemental environmental projects

An Indiana-based power company has reached an agreement with US EPA and State environmental officials to resolve alleged violations of the Clean Air Act. EPA alleges one of the company’s generating stations was emitting nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur dioxide (SO2), particulate matter (PM) and sulfuric acid mist (H2SO4) above the allowable level.
 
The energy provider has agreed to install a pollution control device known as a Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction System (SNCR) on one of the plant’s coal-fired units and upgrade its sulfuric acid mitigation system. The company will also undertake two environmental projects: one to restore and preserve some ecologically significant parcels of land near the plant, and another to mitigate the harm to the environment caused by the plant’s excess emissions over the years.
 

WHO: A waste disposal facility
WHERE: Kimball, NE
WHAT: RCRA, Clean Air Act, and EPCRA violations
HOW MUCH: $790,000

EPA recently announced a settlement with a waste disposal company to address alleged environmental violations at the company’s commercial hazardous waste incinerator. Alleged violations include failure to manage and contain hazardous wastes; failure to comply with air emission limits; failure to comply with chemical accident prevention safety requirements; and failure to timely report use of certain toxic chemicals.
 
The company has agreed to upgrade plans to classify, manage and contain the wastes incinerated at the facility as well as their fire prevention and response program and perform an environmental audit at the facility to identify and address any continuing noncompliance.
 

WHO: A construction materials manufacturer
WHERE: Washington, D.C.
WHAT: Clean Air Act violations
HOW MUCH: $250,000

During an investigation at a ready-mixed concrete supplier, EPA found the supplier alleged operated a stationary engine in violation of Clean Air Act management practices and operated its plant from at least September 2014 to June 2018 without a required Clean Air Act operating permit.
 
The concrete manufacturer has agreed to pay a $250,000 settlement to resolve the alleged violations. Since the violations were identified, the company has moved to a different location in the DC metropolitan area.
 

Convenient, Effective Online EHS Manager Training

Managing site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERLCA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field or need an update on changing EPA rules, online training is a convenient way to quickly build in-depth expertise.

Check out the latest EPA compliance training options here:
 
Clean Air Act Regulations Online
TSCA Regulations Online
Clean Water Act & SDWA Regulations Online
Superfund and Right-to-Know Act Regulations Online 
 

Tags: chemical accident prevention, Chemical safety, Clean Air Act, environmental fines, environmental news, environmental penalties, EPA, EPA Enforcement Roundup, EPA News, EPA violations, EPCRA, RCRA

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

The instructor clearly enjoys his job and transmits that enthusiasm. He made a dry subject very interesting and fun.

Teresa Arellanes

EHS Manager

Convenient; I can train when I want, where I want.

Barry Cook

Hazmat Shipping Professional

I was able to present my scenario to the instructor and worked thru the regulations together. In the past, I attended another training firm's classes. Now, I have no intention of leaving Lion!

Diana Joyner

Senior Environmental Engineer

If I need thorough training or updating, I always use Lion. Lion is always the best in both instruction and materials.

Bryce Parker

EHS Manager

The instructor was probably the best I ever had! He made the class enjoyable, was humorous at times, and very knowledgeable.

Mary Sue Michon

Environmental Administrator

The instructor was very engaging and helped less experienced people understand the concepts.

Steve Gall

Safety Leader

The instructor made the class enjoyable. He presented in a very knowledgeable, personable manner. Best class I've ever attended. Will take one again.

John Nekoloff

Environmental Compliance Manager

Excellent job. Made what is very dry material interesting. Thoroughly explained all topics in easy-to-understand terms.

David Hertvik

Vice President

The course is well thought out and organized in a way that leads to a clearer understanding of the total training.

David Baily

Hazmat Shipping Professional

Excellent course. Very interactive. Explanations are great whether you get the questions wrong or right.

Gregory Thompson

Environmental, Health & Safety Regional Manager

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

This guide will help you identify 25 of the most -cited errors in RCRA training, recordkeeping, hazardous waste ID, container management, universal waste, and laboratories.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.