Search

EPA Proposes Revisions to Tier II Reports

Posted on 8/11/2011 by James Griffin

For the first time in over 20 years, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing changes to the Tier I and Tier II chemical inventory reporting forms.
 
Under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986 (EPCRA), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires all facilities with an inventory of hazardous chemicals to file a Tier I or Tier II report each year with State and local emergency response planners.
 
Over the years, emergency response planners and other stakeholders have identified deficiencies in the existing reporting forms and have asked the EPA to make revisions in order for the Tier II reports to be “…more useful for State and local agencies and to better inform the public on chemical hazards in their communities.”
 
What New Elements Is the EPA Proposing?
 
Facility Emergency Coordinator
Regulated facilities are already supposed to designate a facility representative who will participate in the emergency response planning process with State and local authorities. The EPA is proposing that the identity of the emergency coordinator be included on the Tier II form.
 
Tier I and II Information Contacts
As it stands now, the Tier II report does not include a designated point of contact, which means that State and local emergency response planners have difficulty getting in touch with the person who prepared the Tier II report. If the intent of the Tier II reporting system is to force chemical storage facilities and emergency response planners to coordinate, the lack of a designated point of contact is a problem. Therefore, the EPA is proposing that each Tier II report include the name, title, and contact information of the person knowledgeable of or responsible for completing the Tier II report.
 
Emergency Planning
The Agency also intends for the new Tier II report to include data on whether the facility is subject to Emergency Planning requirements under Section 302 of EPCRA, or the Chemical Accident Risk Prevention or Risk Management Programs under the Clean Air Act.
 
What Data Elements Is the EPA Proposing Changes To?
 
Facility Identification
The EPA is proposing two additional data elements for identifying the owner/operator of a regulated facility. Firstly, in addition to the contact information for the facility proper, the EPA is now requesting the name, address, phone number, and Dun & Bradstreet of the facility’s parent company. Secondly, the EPA is adding a line for the reporting facility’s e-mail address.
 
New Range Codes for Inventories
The EPCRA statute requires that facilities give an estimate in ranges for the maximum and average amount of hazardous chemicals at a facility. As emergency responders consider the existing ranges too broad, the EPA is proposing a new set of ranges to provide more granularity.
 
Chemical Information for Mixtures
Because mixtures of hazardous chemicals can be reported as either the amount of mixture or the amount of hazardous chemical in the mixture, the EPA proposes to create separate entries in the Tier II report for mixtures and pure chemicals.
 
Storage Type/Condition
The Tier II form currently requires facilities to use code numbers to report how chemicals are stored (underground tank, drum, etc.) and under what conditions (temperature, pressure, etc.). The EPA proposes to eliminate the codes and have facilities simply report storage conditions descriptively.
 

Tags: EPA, EPCRA, new rules, reporting and recordkeeping

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

Very well structured, comprehensive, and comparable to live training seminars I've participated in previously. I will recommend the online course to other colleagues with training requirement needs.

Neil Luciano

EHS Manager

Our instructor was very dynamic and kept everyone's interest. Hazmat shipping can be a dry, complicated topic but I was engaged the entire time.

Kimberly Arnao

Senior Director of EH&S

We have a very busy work schedule and using Lion enables us to take the course at our own time. It makes it easy for me to schedule my employees' training.

Timothy Mertes

Hazmat Shipping Professional

Lion courses always set the bar for content, reference, and practical application. Membership and access to the experts is an added bonus.

John Brown, CSP

Director of Safety & Env Affairs

Course instructor was better prepared and presented better than other trainers. Course manual and references were easier to use as well.

Marty Brownfield

Hazardous Waste Professional

The price was reasonable, the time to complete the course was manageable, and the flexibility the online training allowed made it easy to complete.

Felicia Rutledge

Hazmat Shipping Professional

The exercises in the DOT hazardous materials management course are especially helpful in evaluating your understanding of course information.

Morgan Bliss

Principal Industrial Hygienist

The instructor kept the class engaged and made learning fun. There was a lot of information to cover but time flew by. I will definitely use Lion in the future!

Chelsea Minguela

Hazmat Shipping Professional

I can take what I learned in this workshop and apply it to everyday work and relate it to my activities.

Shane Hersh

Materials Handler

Lion is at the top of the industry in compliance training. Course content and structure are updated frequently to make annual re-training enjoyable. I like that Lion has experts that I can contact for 1 year after the training.

Caroline Froning

Plant Chemist

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Knowing why TSDFs reject loads of hazardous waste—and the exact steps to follow if it happens—can reduce your anxiety and uncertainty about rejection.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.