EPA Faces Pushback on Delayed Clean Air Regulations
During his tenure as the Attorney General of Oklahoma, new EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt played a prominent role in challenging many EPA requirements, which led many to believe he would work to take what some consider overly burdensome rules “off the books.”
For a while, things proceeded as expected. EPA announced delays of major Obama-era environmental rules, including:
- Delaying area designations under the lower National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for ozone finalized in 2015;
- Staying updated New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) to limit methane emissions from the oil and gas industry;
- Staying the Clean Power Plan;
- Proposing a recodification of the wide-reaching Waters of the United States (WOTUS) Rule;
- Delaying bolstered Clean Air Act Risk Management Plan requirements for chemical facilities;
- And more.
On August 2, EPA announced it would reverse its decision to delay making area designations for the lowered ozone NAAQS finalized in 2015. This Final Rule lowered the permissible NAAQS from 75 parts per billion to 70 ppb.
EPA Reverses Course on New Ozone NAAQS
Once the new ozone NAAQS was finalized, EPA had two years—until October 1, 2017—to make what are called “area designations.” These designations determine which areas of the US are in compliance with the new standard, and which are not. Those that do not meet the new standard are deemed “non-attainment areas” under the new NAAQS. Stricter Clean Air Act reporting and pollution control requirements apply to construction and modification of facilities in these areas.
Administrator Pruitt announced he would use his authority to delay these NAAQS designations for one year, until October 1, 2018. This week, 15 State Attorneys General filed suit against EPA, claiming this delay was not covered under legal authority granted to the Administrator under 42 U.S.C. 7407(d)(1)(B)(i)—which states clearly that the deadline for area designations “may be extended for up to one year in the event that the Administrator has insufficient information to promulgate the decisions.”
On August 2, EPA announced it has more sufficient information than previously thought and now plans to complete the NAAQS designations by the October 1, 2017 deadline.
In June 2017, EPA announced it would stay for two years and ultimately re-consider New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) that aim to cut emissions of methane and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from oil and gas well and compression station sites.
Regulating Methane Emissions from the Oil and Gas Sector
A D.C. circuit court heard a suit against EPA’s stay of the NSPS and in July 2017 ruled that EPA must vacate its stay. EPA did not appeal this decision.
EPA also faces a lawsuit from a workers’ union and other groups over its June 14, 2017 Final Rule to delay implementation of new Clean Air Act Risk Management Plan requirements intended to prevent large-scale chemical disasters.
EPA Sued Over Clean Air Act Risk Management Plan Delay
Proposed in March 2016 and estimated to impact 12,500 facilities, the rule bolstered emergency preparedness requirements for facilities that store large volumes of hazardous chemicals.
The Clean Air Act Regulations online course guides professionals through compliance with Title V permit requirements, emissions and pollution controls, annual greenhouse gas (GHG) reporting, Risk Management Planning (RMP) responsibilities, and more.
Master the Clean Air Act—Anytime, Anywhere
Build the expertise needed to make informed on-the-job decisions that help your site control pollution and maintain compliance. Interactive, easy to use, and available 24/7, the new online course will help you get up to speed with new and changing EPA Clean Air Act rules and protect your facility from costly EPA enforcement.
Tags: Act, Air, Clean, Clean Water Act, EPA, new rules, Risk Management Plan
Find a Post
I think LION does an excellent job of any training they do. Materials provided are very useful to my day-to-day work activities.
Having the tutorial buttons for additional information was extremely beneficial.
The instructor did an excellent job presenting a very dry subject; keeping everyone interested and making it enjoyable.
Hazardous Waste Professional
This is the best RCRA training I've experienced! I will be visiting Lion training again.
Cynthia L. Logsdon
Principal Environmental Engineer
These are the best commercial course references I have seen (10+ years). Great job!
EHS & Facility Engineer
The instructor was very dedicated to providing a quality experience. She did her best to make sure students were really comprehending the information.
Inventory Control Specialist
I like Lion's workshops the best because they really dig into the information you need to have when you leave the workshop.
Tom Bush, Jr.
Lion's online training is more comprehensive, has better slides, and is a superior training experience than what I would get from other trainers.
District Environmental Manager
Lion's training was by far the best online RCRA training I've ever taken. It was challenging and the layout was great!
Hazardous Waste Professional
The instructor was great, explaining complex topics in terms that were easily understandable and answering questions clearly and thoroughly.
Download Our Latest Whitepaper
In most cases, injuries that occur at work are work-related and must be recorded to maintain compliance with OSHA regulations. This report shows you the 9 types of injuries you don’t record.