Search

EPA Faces Pushback on Delayed Clean Air Regulations

Posted on 8/3/2017 by Roger Marks

When the new Executive branch rolled into Washington, D.C. earlier this year, it seemed certain that at least some of the signature environmental regulations promulgated by US EPA between 2008 and 2017 would be re-considered, scaled back, or undone.

During his tenure as the Attorney General of Oklahoma, new EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt played a prominent role in challenging many EPA requirements, which led many to believe he would work to take what some consider overly burdensome rules “off the books.”

For a while, things proceeded as expected. EPA announced delays of major Obama-era environmental rules, including:
  Now, it seems, the tables have turned—today Pruitt and his EPA face their own set of legal challenges from Attorneys General and environmental groups across the US.


EPA Reverses Course on New Ozone NAAQS

On August 2, EPA announced it would reverse its decision to delay making area designations for the lowered ozone NAAQS finalized in 2015. This Final Rule lowered the permissible NAAQS from 75 parts per billion to 70 ppb.

Once the new ozone NAAQS was finalized, EPA had two years—until October 1, 2017—to make what are called “area designations.” These designations determine which areas of the US are in compliance with the new standard, and which are not. Those that do not meet the new standard are deemed “non-attainment areas” under the new NAAQS. Stricter Clean Air Act reporting and pollution control requirements apply to construction and modification of facilities in these areas.

Administrator Pruitt announced he would use his authority to delay these NAAQS designations for one year, until October 1, 2018. This week, 15 State Attorneys General filed suit against EPA, claiming this delay was not covered under legal authority granted to the Administrator under 42 U.S.C. 7407(d)(1)(B)(i)—which states clearly that the deadline for area designations “may be extended for up to one year in the event that the Administrator has insufficient information to promulgate the decisions.”

On August 2, EPA announced it has more sufficient information than previously thought and now plans to complete the NAAQS designations by the October 1, 2017 deadline.


Regulating Methane Emissions from the Oil and Gas Sector

Oil_and_Gas_EP_oilfield.jpgIn June 2017, EPA announced it would stay for two years and ultimately re-consider New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) that aim to cut emissions of methane and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from oil and gas well and compression station sites.

A D.C. circuit court heard a suit against EPA’s stay of the NSPS and in July 2017 ruled that EPA must vacate its stay. EPA did not appeal this decision.


EPA Sued Over Clean Air Act Risk Management Plan Delay

EPA also faces a lawsuit from a workers’ union and other groups over its June 14, 2017 Final Rule to delay implementation of new Clean Air Act Risk Management Plan requirements intended to prevent large-scale chemical disasters.

Proposed in March 2016 and estimated to impact 12,500 facilities, the rule bolstered emergency preparedness requirements for facilities that store large volumes of hazardous chemicals.


Master the Clean Air Act—Anytime, Anywhere

The Clean Air Act Regulations online course guides professionals through compliance with Title V permit requirements, emissions and pollution controls, annual greenhouse gas (GHG) reporting, Risk Management Planning (RMP) responsibilities, and more. 

Build the expertise needed to make informed on-the-job decisions that help your site control pollution and maintain compliance. Interactive, easy to use, and available 24/7, the new online course will help you get up to speed with new and changing EPA Clean Air Act rules and protect your facility from costly EPA enforcement. 
 
 

Tags: Act, Air, Clean, Clean Water Act, EPA, new rules, Risk Management Plan

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

I used the IT support number available and my issue was resolved within a few minutes. I don't see anything that could have made it better.

Danny Province

EHS Professional

Lion is my preferred trainer for hazmat and DOT.

Jim Jani

Environmental Coordinator

Lion provided an excellent introduction to environmental regulations, making the transition to a new career as an EHS specialist less daunting of a task. Drinking from a fire hose when the flow of water is lessened, is much more enjoyable!

Stephanie Weathers

SHE Specialist

These are the best commercial course references I have seen (10+ years). Great job!

Ed Grzybowski

EHS & Facility Engineer

Excellent course. Very interactive. Explanations are great whether you get the questions wrong or right.

Gregory Thompson

Environmental, Health & Safety Regional Manager

My experience with Lion classes has always been good. Lion Technology always covers the EPA requirements I must follow.

Steven Erlandson

Environmental Coordinator

This is the best RCRA training I've experienced! I will be visiting Lion training again.

Cynthia L. Logsdon

Principal Environmental Engineer

Amazing instructor; real-life examples. Lion training gets better every year!

Frank Papandrea

Environmental Manager

Lion was very responsive to my initial questions and the website was user friendly.

Michael Britt

Supply Chain Director

Having the tutorial buttons for additional information was extremely beneficial.

Sharon Ziemek

EHS Manager

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Knowing why TSDFs reject loads of hazardous waste—and the exact steps to follow if it happens—can reduce your anxiety and uncertainty about rejection.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.