Search

EPA Enforcement Roundup: Week of 2/7

Posted on 2/7/2022 by Lauren Scott

Industrial facilities in the United States are subject to complex, overlapping environmental regulations concerning air emissions, discharges to water, hazardous waste management and disposal, oil spills, chemical management, and more. Failure to comply with all applicable US EPA requirements can result in future liability and civil penalties as high as $100,000+ per day, per violation (and growing every year).

The EPA enforcement actions highlighted below provide insight into how and why the Agency assesses civil penalties for environmental noncompliance. All violations mentioned are alleged unless we indicate otherwise.

We withhold the names of organizations and individuals subject to enforcement to protect their privacy.
 

WHO: A building materials manufacturer
WHERE: Norwood, MA
WHAT: EPCRA violations
HOW MUCH: $104,572

According to EPA, a New England maker of construction materials failed to file Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) reports for zinc compounds and chromium compounds for reporting years 2017, 2018, and 2019 in a timely manner. Annual TRI reporting is required under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) Section 313.

Once advised, the company since submitted the required reports and paid a civil penalty. Complying with EPCRA and TRI helps ensure that communities are informed about chemical usage that may affect public health and the environment.
 

WHO: A chemical plant
WHERE: Leland, NC
WHAT: RCRA violations
HOW MUCH: $39,500

A chemical distillation and blending facility agreed to a five-figure civil penalty to resolve alleged hazardous management violations. Between January 2015 and November 2019, the company used isopropyl alcohol and acetone solvents to clean tanks at the facility. During a later EPA Compliance Evaluation Inspection, the Agency found that the company failed to make hazardous waste determination on the spent chemicals generated and managed at the facility.

The inspection also identified that the company allegedly failed to file a notification with the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality to become a handler of hazardous secondary materials in accordance with North Carolina hazardous waste regulations.
 

WHO: A waste treatment facility
WHERE: Bristol, CT
WHAT: EPCRA violations
HOW MUCH: $30,688

EPA alleged that a waste treatment facility failed to file TRI reports for company-manufactured zinc compounds and nitrate compounds for calendar years 2017, 2018, and 2019 in a timely manner. Following EPA's notification about the alleged violations, the facility filed all six of its overdue reports and agreed to pay a settlement penalty of $30,688.

Under Federal TRI regulations, companies that use certain listed chemicals must report their chemical releases each year to EPA. This information serves as the basis for the Toxic Release Inventory, which is a collection of data that can be readily reviewed by communities, government, and industry.
 

Convenient, Effective Online EHS Manager Training

Managing site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERLCA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field or need an update on changing EPA rules, online training is a convenient way to quickly build in-depth expertise.

Check out the latest EPA compliance training options here:
 
Complete Environmental Regulations
Clean Air Act Regulations Online
TSCA Regulations Online
Clean Water Act & SDWA Regulations Online
Superfund and Right-to-Know Act Regulations Online 
 

Tags: EPA, EPA Enforcement Roundup, EPCRA, fines, hazardous waste management, penalties, RCRA, roundup, TRI reporting

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

I used the IT support number available and my issue was resolved within a few minutes. I don't see anything that could have made it better.

Danny Province

EHS Professional

I think LION does an excellent job of any training they do. Materials provided are very useful to my day-to-day work activities.

Pamela Embody

EHS Specialist

The instructor was very engaging and helped less experienced people understand the concepts.

Steve Gall

Safety Leader

The course was very informative and presented in a way that was easily understood and remembered. I would recommend this course.

Jeffrey Tierno

Hazmat Shipping Professional

Lion's course was superior to others I have taken in the past. Very clear in the presentation and the examples helped to explain the content presented.

George Bersik

Hazardous Waste Professional

The instructor kept the class engaged and made learning fun. There was a lot of information to cover but time flew by. I will definitely use Lion in the future!

Chelsea Minguela

Hazmat Shipping Professional

I have attended other training providers, but Lion is best. Lion is king of the hazmat jungle!!!

Henry Watkins

Hazardous Waste Technician

I will never go anywhere, but to Lion Technology.

Dawn Swofford

EHS Technician

Excellent course. Very interactive. Explanations are great whether you get the questions wrong or right.

Gregory Thompson

Environmental, Health & Safety Regional Manager

Attending Lion Technology classes should be mandatory for every facility that ships or stores hazmat.

Genell Drake

Outbound Lead

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Four key considerations to help you maximize the convenience and quality of your experience with online training.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.