Search

How States Adopt New RCRA Hazardous Waste Rules

Posted on 1/26/2016 by Roseanne Bottone

Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), Congress and the US EPA encourage each state to implement and oversee its own hazardous waste program. With the exception of Alaska and Iowa, each US state (and several territories) maintains its own RCRA program that operates in lieu of the Federal rules.

For the US EPA to authorize a state’s RCRA program to operate in lieu of Federal standards, the state program must be:

  • Consistent with the Federal RCRA standards; and
  • Holistically at least as stringent as the RCRA requirements.
Specific requirements for State hazardous waste programs, and the procedures the US EPA uses to authorize State programs, are found in Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR) Part 271.

RCRA hazardous waste manager


General Principles for Adopting New Hazardous Waste Rules

So what happens to an authorized State plan when the US EPA issues a new hazardous waste rule? How states respond to new Federal hazardous waste standards will depend on a few key factors: 
 
  1. A new rule promulgated under the authority of the basic RCRA statute is not enforceable in a state with an Authorized Plan until the state adopts an equivalent rule. If the new rule is more stringent than the Federal RCRA regulations, the state has one year to adopt a consistent and equivalent standard. In this case, the new rule is not enforceable in the interim period.

  2. When the EPA makes a new rule is created under the authority of the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA)—passed by Congress in 1984 to expand the scope of RCRA—the US EPA can enforce the new rule immediately, even in a state that has not yet adopted it. The state is required to incorporate the new rule (or an equivalent rule) into its State regulations within one year.

  3. When US EPA issues new rules that are less stringent than existing State rules, states are not required to adopt the new rule.


Case Study—EPA’s New RCRA Definition of Solid Waste

On January 13, 2015 (at 80 FR 1694), the EPA published a final rule under RCRA to amend its Definition of Solid Waste (DSW). The revised standards provided relief for hazardous waste generators by authorizing exclusions for certain recycling activities. States with Authorized Plans are not required to adopt these new regulatory exclusions. However, several conforming provisions of the new rule are more stringent than pre-existing RCRA regulations. The new portions that are most likely to be more stringent than existing State regulations are:

  • The codification of conditions for demonstrating a material is being legitimately recycled [40 CFR 260.43];

  • Adding “sham recycling” to the definition of solid waste [40 CFR 261.2(g)]; and

  • Adding labeling and recordkeeping requirements to the definition of “speculative accumulation” [40 CFR 261.1(c)(8)].

While these newly restrictive standards are not yet enforceable in self-run states, the provisions must be adopted into Authorized Plans before June 2016, or else self-run states risk losing their RCRA authority.

For those provisions of the new rule that create new relief for hazardous waste generators, each state will determine whether to adopt each new provision as is, adopt it with variations, or reject it entirely.

Read more about State implementation of the new RCRA Definition of Solid Waste here.

Exclusive State RCRA Summaries for Lion Members

Are you a Lion Member? For an easy-to-read breakdown of the specific, unique requirements in your state, log in to the Member Area here. Click the Resources Tab, and select your state from the pull-down menu to access your free State Summary.

Lion Membership is included with enrollment in many of Lion’s hazardous waste training workshops, online courses, and webinars. Learn more about Federal and State RCRA training for your hazardous waste personnel here.

Tags: hazardous waste, new rules, RCRA, state rules

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

The training was impressive. I am not a fan of online training but this was put together very well. I would recommend Lion to others.

Donnie James

Quality Manager

Given the choice, I would do all coursework this way. In-person courses go very fast without the opportunity to pause or repeat anything.

Ellen Pelton

Chemical Laboratory Manager

The online course was well thought out and organized, with good interaction between the student and the course.

Larry Ybarra

Material Release Agent

I attended training from another provider and learned absolutely nothing. Lion is much better. Hands down.

Nicole Eby

Environmental Specialist

Our instructor was very dynamic and kept everyone's interest. Hazmat shipping can be a dry, complicated topic but I was engaged the entire time.

Kimberly Arnao

Senior Director of EH&S

I had a positive experience utilizing this educational program. It was very informative, convenient, and rewarding from a career perspective.

John Gratacos

Logistics Manager

The instructor created a great learning environment.

Avinash Thummadi

CAD & Environmental Manager

The instructor was very patient and engaging - willing to answer and help explain subject matter.

Misty Filipp

Material Control Superintendent

The course is well thought out and organized in a way that leads to a clearer understanding of the total training.

David Baily

Hazmat Shipping Professional

These are the best commercial course references I have seen (10+ years). Great job!

Ed Grzybowski

EHS & Facility Engineer

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Look beyond the annual "Top 10 List" to see specifics about the most cited OSHA health & safety Standards and the individual regulations that tripped up employers the most last year. 

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.