EPA Enforcement Roundup: Week of 1/31
The EPA enforcement actions highlighted below provide insight into how and why the Agency assesses civil penalties for environmental noncompliance. All violations mentioned are alleged unless we indicate otherwise.
We withhold the names of organizations and individuals subject to enforcement to protect their privacy.
WHO: A gas station chain
In its complaint, EPA alleged that a gas station chain violated the Federal hazardous waste regulations and the Puerto Rico Underground Storage Tank Control requirements by failing to use proper equipment for underground storage tanks, conduct required operation and maintenance, and report and investigate suspected releases. These alleged violations span throughout 15 of the company’s locations.
WHERE: 15 locations in PR
WHAT: RCRA violations
HOW MUCH: $125,000 plus $600,000 in upgrades
As part of the settlement, the company agreed leak detection systems in at least 43 gas stations; implement or upgrade automatic tank gauging release detection; and install a centralized monitoring system, which will provide instant notifications in the event of a potential or actual leak. This new monitoring system is valued at approximately $600,000.
WHO: A chemical manufacturer
A facility that manufactures cleaning products will pay a six-figure civil penalty to resolve alleged Risk Management Plan violations related to its handling and storage of isobutane and propane. Following a 2019 inspection, EPA determined that the company failed to comply with several key release prevention requirements, including failure to develop adequate standard operating procedures, failure to establish procedures for ensuring appropriate inspections of piping, and failure to conduct certain safety reviews.
WHERE: Great Bend, KS
WHAT: Clean Air Act violations
HOW MUCH: $144,924
In response to EPA’s findings, the company took the necessary steps to return the facility to compliance. The Clean Air Act’s Risk Management Plan Rule regulations require facilities that use regulated toxic and/or flammable substances to develop a Risk Management Plan, which identifies the potential effects of a chemical accident; identifies steps a facility is taking to prevent an accident; and spells out emergency response procedures should an accident occur.
WHO: A municipal drinking and wastewater system
A New Jersey water provider announced a new agreement with US EPA and the NJ Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) to make significant improvements to a city drinking water and sewage system as part of a consent decree that began in 2011. These improvements are expected to drastically reduce the amount of pollution being discharged into the Hackensack River, Hudson River, and Newark Bay, benefiting communities of color facing environmental justice challenges.
WHERE: Jersey City, NJ
WHAT: Clean Water Act and Safe Drinking Water Act violations
HOW MUCH: $1.1 billion in system repairs
According to the original consent decree, the municipal water system allegedly failed to properly operate and maintain its combined sewer system, which led to repeated releases of untreated sewage into the Hackensack River, Hudson River, Newark Bay, and Penhorn Creek. The system will now replace over 12,000 lead drinking water pipes, expand system capacity, and complete a comprehensive assessment of the condition of its sewer system.
Convenient, Effective Online EHS Manager TrainingManaging site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERCLA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field or need an update on changing EPA rules, online training is a convenient way to quickly build in-depth expertise.
Check out the latest EPA compliance training options here:
Complete Environmental Regulations
Clean Air Act Regulations Online
TSCA Regulations Online
Clean Water Act & SDWA Regulations Online
Superfund and Right-to-Know Act Regulations Online
The instructor had knowledge of regulations and understanding of real-world situations. The presentation style was engaging and fostered a positive atmosphere for information sharing.
Safety & Environmental Compliance Officer
The instructor did an excellent job presenting a very dry subject; keeping everyone interested and making it enjoyable.
Hazardous Waste Professional
I love that the instructor emphasized the thought process behind the regs.
Corporate Product Stewardship Specialist
Lion's training was by far the best online RCRA training I've ever taken. It was challenging and the layout was great!
Hazardous Waste Professional
These are the best commercial course references I have seen (10+ years). Great job!
EHS & Facility Engineer
The instructor was very patient and engaging - willing to answer and help explain subject matter.
Material Control Superintendent
Lion's course was superior to others I have taken in the past. Very clear in the presentation and the examples helped to explain the content presented.
Hazardous Waste Professional
Excellent course. Very interactive. Explanations are great whether you get the questions wrong or right.
Environmental, Health & Safety Regional Manager
I really enjoyed this training. Even after years on both sides of the comprehension coin, I find myself still learning! The quality of the delivery exceeded much of the training I have received in the past.
Lion's information is very thorough and accurate. Presenter was very good.
Download Our Latest Whitepaper
Shipping papers are a crucial part of safely shipping hazardous materials. See the top 5 mistakes shippers make on shipping papers, and how to avoid them.