EPA Updates EPCRA Chemical Reporting to Match GHS HazCom

Posted on 7/21/2016 by Roger Marks

When it comes to overlapping chemical requirements, major changes tend to reverberate across many environmental and safety programs.

On June 13, EPA posted a Final Rule to the Federal Register to update manufacturers’ reporting and recordkeeping responsibilities under Sections 311 and 312 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA). Among other changes, EPA updated the definition of “hazardous chemical” in Section 311(3) of EPCRA to match the definition given by OSHA’s revised HazCom Standard at 29 CFR 1910.1200(c). 

Even “small” GHS changes can have far-reaching effects. For example, OSHA changed the name of the “Material Safety Data Sheet,” or MSDS, to “Safety Data Sheet”, or SDS, when it harmonized its hazards communication requirements with the global Standard. EPCRA, however, still referred to Material Safety Data Sheets and MSDSs when discussing the information chemical manufacturers must submit to EPA. EPA’s June 13 rulemaking updated the language used to match that used in the now-mandatory GHS hazard communication rules at 29 CFR 1910.1200.

Hazardous chemicals regulated by GHS hazcom rules

EPA Issues Correction to EPCRA Chemical Reporting Rules

However, in the same June 13 rule to conform EPCRA chemical reporting requirements with OSHA’s 2012 Hazard Communication rulemaking to adopt global standards, EPA accidentally removed the phrases “serious eye damage or eye irritation” from the definition of “health hazard” at 40 CFR 370.66.

Consequently, on July 21, EPA followed up the rulemaking with a Final Rule to make a critical correction to the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) chemical reporting requirements. Effective immediately, EPA added “serious eye damage or eye irritation” back into the definition of “health hazard.”

EPCRA Reporting Requirements

Under EPCRA, US EPA requires chemical manufacturers and importers to report on their inventories of toxic chemicals and releases of toxic chemicals from their facilities. “Releases” in this context can mean authorized air emissions, water discharges, water treatment and disposal, and/or accidental releases to the environment.

Need help with Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) reporting? See our Tips for Form R Reports here.  

Questions about GHS and EPCRA reporting? Check out How GHS Affects Your EPCRA Responsibilities.

Or get more information about TRI reporting under EPCRA at EPA’s website.

Expand Your Environmental Expertise

To help chemical industry professionals build confidence making decisions that ensure compliance with EPA chemical, air, and water requirements, Lion will present the expert-led Complete Environmental Regulations Workshop in nine more US cities before the end of 2016. If you're responsible for ensuring site compliance with many complex programs—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, FIFRA, EPCRA, and more—this workshop will help you identify the requirements that apply to your facility and make decisions that put your environmental team in a position to succeed.

2016 EPA Regulations Workshops:

Sept. 12–13 Dallas
Sept. 15–16 Little Rock
Sept. 19–20 New Orleans
Sept. 22–23 Houston
Oct. 3–4 Las Vegas
Oct. 6–7 Denver
Oct. 27–28 Salt Lake City
Oct. 31–Nov. 1 San Jose
Nov. 3–4 Los Angeles
Sign Up Now.


Tags: EPA, EPCRA, GHS, hazard communication, new rules

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

Lion courses always set the bar for content, reference, and practical application. Membership and access to the experts is an added bonus.

John Brown, CSP

Director of Safety & Env Affairs

The training was impressive. I am not a fan of online training but this was put together very well. I would recommend Lion to others.

Donnie James

Quality Manager

Lion does a great job summarizing and communicating complicated EH&S-related regulations.

Michele Irmen

Sr. Environmental Engineer

Very well structured, comprehensive, and comparable to live training seminars I've participated in previously. I will recommend the online course to other colleagues with training requirement needs.

Neil Luciano

EHS Manager

Best course instructor I've ever had. Funny, relatable, engaging; made it interesting and challenged us as the professionals we are.

Amanda Schwartz

Environmental Coordinator

The instructor had knowledge of regulations and understanding of real-world situations. The presentation style was engaging and fostered a positive atmosphere for information sharing.

Linda Arlen

Safety & Environmental Compliance Officer

The instructor was probably the best I ever had! He made the class enjoyable, was humorous at times, and very knowledgeable.

Mary Sue Michon

Environmental Administrator

I tried other environmental training providers, but they were all sub-standard compared to Lion. I will not stray from Lion again!

Sara Sills

Environmental Specialist

The workshop covered a lot of information without being too overwhelming. Lion is much better, more comprehensive than other training providers.

George Alva

Manufacturing Manager

The instructor made the class very enjoyable and catered to the needs of our group.

Sarah Baker


Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Look beyond the annual "Top 10 List" to see specifics about the most cited OSHA health & safety Standards and the individual regulations that tripped up employers the most last year. 

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.