Available Now: 2023 Schedule of Hazmat & RCRA Training
Search

Supreme Court Backs EPA on Mercury Air Toxics Standards

Posted on 3/4/2016 by Roger Marks

On Wednesday, March 2, the US Supreme Court chose not to hear a petition to block EPA rules to limit mercury and other toxic air pollutants emitted from coal-burning power plants—the Mercury Air Toxics Standards (MATS). 

Clean Air Act Section 112 Authority  

Under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act authorizes US EPA to set national emissions standards for hazardous air pollutants, or NESHAPs, from major sources. In February 2012, EPA sought to include coal- and oil-fired electricity generating units (EGUs) on the list of major sources of air pollution.

Clean Air Act and Michigan v. EPA

In June 2015, the Supreme Court, in Michigan v. EPA, ruled that US EPA unreasonably interpreted Federal law when it set the MATS Final Rule, citing the Agency’s failure to consider costs to industry. This returned the case to the lower court for further argument.

After this decision, twenty US states joined together to challenge the rule, claiming that because EPA overstepped its authority and did not adequately consider costs to industry during the rulemaking process, the Supreme Court should “stay” the rule pending the outcome of litigation.

EPA released a supplemental finding in December 2015 to present and defend its cost-benefit analysis of new mercury air standards. This week’s Supreme Court decision rejects the states’ petition for a stay.

EPA Clean air act rules for power plants

What Happens Now?

Because the Supreme Court declined to hear the petition to stay EPA's Final Rule, implementation of the new air standards will continue while EPA again presents its case, including the cost-benefit analysis, in the lower courts. The DC Court of Appeals already declined to block the rule, and a re-do of this case may signal the end of challengers’ options to stop the new air requirements.

Another Clean Air Act Case to Watch

This is just one of the Supreme Court cases in recent memory devoted to EPA’s Clean Air Act rules for power plants. Earlier this month, the Supreme Court voted 5-4 to stay EPA’s Clean Power Plan, which sought to create new air quality standards for carbon dioxide (CO2) from power plants.

New Clean Air Act Training for EHS Pros

Keep your facility in compliance with all the US EPA’s Clean Air Act programs! The Clean Air Act Regulations will guide you through compliance with permit requirements, emissions and pollution controls, annual greenhouse gas (GHG) reporting, Risk Management Planning (RMP) responsibilities, and more. 

Build the expertise needed to make informed on-the-job decisions that help your site control pollution and maintain compliance. Interactive, easy to use, and available 24/7, the new online course will help you get up to speed with new and changing EPA clean air rules and protect your facility from costly EPA enforcement.

Tags: Act, Air, Clean, EPA

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

You blew the doors off the competition!

Stephen Bieschke

Facilities Manager

Lion's course was superior to others I have taken in the past. Very clear in the presentation and the examples helped to explain the content presented.

George Bersik

Hazardous Waste Professional

The course was very informative and presented in a way that was easily understood and remembered. I would recommend this course.

Jeffrey Tierno

Hazmat Shipping Professional

The instructor was energetic and made learning fun compared to dry instructors from other training providers.

Andy D’Amato

International Trade Compliance Manager

Lion's information is very thorough and accurate. Presenter was very good.

Melissa Little

Regulatory Manager

Our instructor was very dynamic and kept everyone's interest. Hazmat shipping can be a dry, complicated topic but I was engaged the entire time.

Kimberly Arnao

Senior Director of EH&S

I was able to present my scenario to the instructor and worked thru the regulations together. In the past, I attended another training firm's classes. Now, I have no intention of leaving Lion!

Diana Joyner

Senior Environmental Engineer

I really enjoyed this training. Even after years on both sides of the comprehension coin, I find myself still learning! The quality of the delivery exceeded much of the training I have received in the past.

Neil Ozonur

Safety Officer

This course went above my expectations from the moment I walked in the door. The instructor led us through two days packed with useful compliance information.

Rachel Stewart

Environmental Manager

The online course was well thought out and organized, with good interaction between the student and the course.

Larry Ybarra

Material Release Agent

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Get to know the top 5 changes to OSHA’s revised GHS Hazard Communication Standard at 29 CFR 1910.1200 and how the updates impacts employee safety at your facility.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.