EPA Enforcement Roundup: Week of 3/24

Posted on 3/24/2020 by Lauren Scott

Every day, facilities across the US receive Notices of Violation (NOV) from the US EPA for alleged noncompliance with a wide variety of programs like the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts; chemical management and reporting regulations (TSCA, EPCRA, CERCLA, etc.); hazardous waste management and disposal standards (RCRA); and much more.

Below are examples of recent EPA enforcement actions that provide insight into how and why EPA issues civil penalties to facilities for environmental noncompliance. The names of the companies and individuals cited by EPA have been withheld to protect their privacy.

WHO: An oil and gas company
WHERE: Park County, WY
WHAT: Clean Water Act and SPCC violations
HOW MUCH: $115,000

A Texas-based oil and gas provider announced a settlement with EPA to resolve alleged violations at their Wyoming oil production facilities. The violations involved two improper releases that affected the Big Horn River. Together, the releases resulted in approximately 300 barrels of crude oil and 1,000 barrels of produced water to be discharged.

EPA also cited deficiencies in the company’s Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) procedures. The oil and gas company has since corrected its SPCC plan and paid a civil penalty.

WHO: A copper processing facility
WHERE: Hayden, AZ
WHAT: Clean Air Act violations
HOW MUCH: $33,000

EPA issued a five-figure penalty to an industrial metalworking company for allegedly not complying with a fugitive dust plan that had been addressed in a previous EPA settlement. The dust plan was designed to address the release of lead, coarse dust, and other hazardous air pollutants at the company’s copper smelter.

According to the plan, the facility is required to operate water sprayer systems at various sites to abate fugitive dust emissions. Federal officials identified 33 days during which water was not sprayed on certain required fugitive dust sources. Under the terms of the 2015 settlement, the company is liable for $1,000 for each day the water sprayers were not operating, resulting in $33,000 in stipulated penalties.

WHO: An asphalt paving corporation
WHERE: Falmouth, MA
WHAT: Clean Water Act violations
HOW MUCH: $3,000

A paving company reached a settlement with Federal officials to resolve alleged violations of oil pollution prevention regulations. On Sept. 10, 2019, EPA investigated the facility and found its SPCC Plan was inadequate and in need to updating. EPA also found one area of the facility where containment allegedly needed to be addressed.

The paving company has agreed to submit an updated SPCC plan to address the deficiencies. The company will also assess its asphalt cement storage units and plans to correct any containment deficiencies that are found.

Convenient, Effective Online EHS Manager Training

Managing site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERLCA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field, or need an update on changing EPA rules, online training is a convenient way to quickly build in-depth expertise.

Check out the latest EPA compliance training options here:
Clean Air Act Regulations Online
TSCA Regulations Online
Clean Water Act & SDWA Regulations Online
Superfund and Right-to-Know Act Regulations Online 
The Complete Environmental Regulations Course is available online. This online course can help you identify the requirements that apply to your facility, ask the right questions, and make the right decisions about EPA compliance.

Tags: Arizona, Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, enforcement, environmental, EPA, EPA Enforcement Roundup, haz waste, hazardous waste, Massachusetts, oil spill, penalties, SPCC, wyoming

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

The course is well thought out and organized in a way that leads to a clearer understanding of the total training.

David Baily

Hazmat Shipping Professional

These are the best commercial course references I have seen (10+ years). Great job!

Ed Grzybowski

EHS & Facility Engineer

Convenient; I can train when I want, where I want.

Barry Cook

Hazmat Shipping Professional

If I need thorough training or updating, I always use Lion. Lion is always the best in both instruction and materials.

Bryce Parker

EHS Manager

Excellent course. Very interactive. Explanations are great whether you get the questions wrong or right.

Gregory Thompson

Environmental, Health & Safety Regional Manager

I attended training from another provider and learned absolutely nothing. Lion is much better. Hands down.

Nicole Eby

Environmental Specialist

The instructor was very knowledgeable and provided pertinent information above and beyond the questions that were asked.

Johnny Barton

Logistics Coordinator

The workshop covered a lot of information without being too overwhelming. Lion is much better, more comprehensive than other training providers.

George Alva

Manufacturing Manager

I can take what I learned in this workshop and apply it to everyday work and relate it to my activities.

Shane Hersh

Materials Handler

My experience with Lion classes has always been good. Lion Technology always covers the EPA requirements I must follow.

Steven Erlandson

Environmental Coordinator

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Ace hazmat inspections. Protect personnel. Defend against civil and criminal penalties. How? See the self-audit "best practices" for hazardous materials shippers.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.