EPA Enforcement Roundup: Week of 3/9
Below are examples of recent EPA enforcement actions that provide insight into how and why EPA issues civil penalties to facilities for environmental noncompliance. Names of companies and individuals cited by EPA are withheld to protect their privacy.
WHO: An explosives manufacturer
EPA alleges that an explosives manufacturing company located in the Midwest violated RCRA requirements at two of its Missouri facilities when it allegedly disposed of hazardous waste, including explosives, without a permit. The company also failed to meet Federal Clean Water Act requirements by allegedly discharging pollutants such as ammonia, nitrate, and Nitroglycerin into Center Creek and the Mississippi River in amounts that exceeded the facilities’ permitted limits.
WHERE: Carthage, MO
WHAT: Clean Water Act and RCRA violations
HOW MUCH: $2.9 million
The company has agreed to make extensive improvements to its facilities to prevent future releases and discharges of explosives, nitrogen, and other pollutants, ultimately reducing pollution levels in nearby waterways.
WHO: A fuel oil distributor
A Mid-Atlantic petroleum distributor reached a settlement with EPA over alleged violations of Federal Underground Storage Tank (UST) regulations. The case stems from a 2016 investigation where EPA found the company allegedly did not have the proper overfill prevention standards in place at two of its facilities. Federal officials also noted that the company failed to acquire insurance coverage in case of third-party bodily injury.
WHERE: Rosendale, NY
WHAT: UST violations
HOW MUCH: $82,500
The company has agreed to pay $82,500 to settle the alleged UST violations and has agreed to come into compliance.
WHO: A cold storage facility
EPA announced a settlement with a cold food storage facility to resolve alleged violations of the Clean Air Act’s chemical accident prevention requirements. Following an inspection of the facility, EPA alleged the company failed to safely manage anhydrous ammonia. EPA also alleges the company failed to timely and accurately submit chemical inventory information regarding the ammonia to the state of Arizona and local emergency response agencies, in violation of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act.
WHERE: Yuma, AZ
WHAT: Clean Air Act and EPCRA violations
HOW MUCH: $26,250 plus a $98,438 Supplemental Environmental Project
As part of the settlement, the company agreed to complete a supplemental environmental project to enhance safety equipment and procedures at the Yuma facility. The project includes installing a new alarm system with sensors to detect ammonia leaks that will automatically shut down the ammonia system, trigger ventilation fans, and notify all within the facility.
Convenient, Effective Online EHS Manager TrainingManaging site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERLCA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field, or need an update on changing EPA rules, online training is a convenient way to quickly build in-depth expertise.
Check out the latest EPA compliance training options here:
Clean Air Act Regulations Online
TSCA Regulations Online
Clean Water Act & SDWA Regulations Online
Superfund and Right-to-Know Act Regulations Online
The nationwide schedule for the Complete Environmental Regulations Workshop is available online. Collaborate with other managers to identify the requirements that apply to your facility, ask the right questions, and make the right decisions about EPA compliance.
Tags: ammonia, Arizona, AZ, chemical management, Chemical safety, Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, cold storage, EPA Enforcement Roundup, EPCRA, explosive disposal, explosives, hazardous waste, hazardous waste disposal, manufacturing, missouri, MO, New York, NY, RCRA, underground storage tank, UST
Find a Post
I attended training from another provider and learned absolutely nothing. Lion is much better. Hands down.
Much better than my previous class with another company. The Lion instructor made sense, kept me awake and made me laugh!
Enterprise Safety Manager
If I need thorough training or updating, I always use Lion. Lion is always the best in both instruction and materials.
I tried other environmental training providers, but they were all sub-standard compared to Lion. I will not stray from Lion again!
The instructor clearly enjoys his job and transmits that enthusiasm. He made a dry subject very interesting and fun.
Having the tutorial buttons for additional information was extremely beneficial.
The price was reasonable, the time to complete the course was manageable, and the flexibility the online training allowed made it easy to complete.
Hazmat Shipping Professional
The instructor was very engaging and helped less experienced people understand the concepts.
I had a positive experience utilizing this educational program. It was very informative, convenient, and rewarding from a career perspective.
The course is well thought out and organized in a way that leads to a clearer understanding of the total training.
Hazmat Shipping Professional
Download Our Latest Whitepaper
Ace hazmat inspections. Protect personnel. Defend against civil and criminal penalties. How? See the self-audit "best practices" for hazardous materials shippers.