EPA Enforcement Roundup: Week of 5/28
Below are examples of recent EPA enforcement actions that provide insight into how and why EPA issues civil penalties to facilities for environmental noncompliance. Names of companies and individuals cited by EPA are withheld to protect their privacy.
WHO: A gas station parent company
A company that owns 23 gas stations in Nebraska and Iowa agreed to pay a $16,448 penalty for allegedly failing to conduct required inspections and keep records for equipment designed to detect leaks from underground storage tanks (USTs), according to EPA. EPA inspections also revealed that the company failed to properly maintain overfill protection at two facilities, which would prevent gasoline spills when pumped from USTs.
WHERE: Omaha, NE and Council Bluffs, IA
WHAT: RCRA hazardous waste management violations
HOW MUCH: $16,448 penalty and $133,000 to upgrade monitoring/alarm systems
As part of the agreement with EPA, the company will spend $133,000 to upgrade monitoring and alarm systems at each of its gas stations to enable any fuel leaks to be reported directly to a central location.
Strengthen your RCRA expertise and learn what you need to know to keep hazardous waste in compliance from cradle to grave. The RCRA Hazardous Waste Management Workshop comes to Albany, Baltimore, Boston, Philadelphia, and other cities in June.
Can't join us live? Check out the RCRA online course or RCRA Refresher online course.
WHO: A dairy processing plant
One of the largest family-owned dairy companies in the Western US has reached a settlement with EPA for alleged violations in the plant’s process safety information, pipe labeling, operating procedures, and mechanical integrity program. EPA also found the company to be in violation of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) for failing to submit an annual chemical inventory for ammonia located at the plant.
WHERE: Fresno, CA
WHAT: Clean Air Act and EPCRA violations
HOW MUCH: $89,960 penalty and $26,000 to purchase emergency response equipment
In addition to the $89,960 civil penalty, EPA ordered the facility to purchase and provide approximately $26,300 worth of emergency response equipment to the Fresno City Fire Department as part of a supplemental environmental project.
WHO: An industrial lumber treatment facility
A lumber processing facility has been fined $320,000 amid allegations that it failed to comply with Clean Water Act stormwater management regulations. EPA alleges that the Agency found process water discharges during inspections in 2014, which are prohibited under EPA’s Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasures regulations.
WHERE: Pacific Northwest and Alaska
WHAT: Clean Water Act violations
HOW MUCH: $320,000
The company has also agreed to build a treatment system to address ongoing water quality violations and invest in a Supplementary Environmental Project that will allow roughly 38 acres of undeveloped land to be permanently set aside for conservation and recreational purposes.
Convenient, Effective Online EHS Manager TrainingManaging site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERLCA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field, or need an update on changing EPA rules, online training is a convenient way to quickly build in-depth expertise.
Check out the latest EPA compliance training options here:
Clean Air Act Regulations Online
TSCA Regulations Online
New! Clean Water Act & SDWA Regulations Online
Just Launched! Superfund and Right-to-Know Act Regulations Online
The 2019 nationwide schedule for the Complete Environmental Regulations Workshop is now available. Collaborate with other managers to identify the requirements that apply to your facility, ask the right questions, and make the right decisions about EPA compliance.
I used the IT support number available and my issue was resolved within a few minutes. I don't see anything that could have made it better.
This training broke down the regulations in an easy-to-understand manner and made them less overwhelming. I now feel I have the knowledge to make more informed decisions.
My experience with Lion classes has always been good. Lion Technology always covers the EPA requirements I must follow.
I think LION does an excellent job of any training they do. Materials provided are very useful to my day-to-day work activities.
The exercises in the DOT hazardous materials management course are especially helpful in evaluating your understanding of course information.
Principal Industrial Hygienist
Excellent. I learned more in two days with Lion than at a 5-day program I took with another provider.
The instructor was very patient and engaging - willing to answer and help explain subject matter.
Material Control Superintendent
Course instructor was better prepared and presented better than other trainers. Course manual and references were easier to use as well.
Hazardous Waste Professional
The instructor clearly enjoys his job and transmits that enthusiasm. He made a dry subject very interesting and fun.
This is a very informative training compared to others. It covers everything I expect to learn and even a lot of new things.
Waste Management Professional
Download Our Latest Whitepaper
In most cases, injuries that occur at work are work-related and must be recorded to maintain compliance with OSHA regulations. This report shows you the 9 types of injuries you don’t record.