Methylene Chloride Draft TSCA Risk Evaluation Released by EPA

Posted on 11/5/2019 by Lauren Scott

On October 29, 2019, EPA unveiled a draft risk evaluation for the chemical methylene chloride (MC). This comes after a prohibition on consumer sales was enacted in March of this year to go into effect at the end of November.

The risk evaluation examines more than 70 uses of MC, including commercial paint and coating removal, consumer adhesives, sealants, degreasers, cleaners, and automobile products, to determine any hazards associated with the use of the chemical under these conditions. Under the latest TSCA amendment, MC is the fifth of the first ten chemicals prioritized to undergo risk evaluation.

View the draft risk evaluation here.

However, this is only a draft risk evaluation. A final risk evaluation is not expected for several months. No action will be taken until the final risk evaluation is released.

What’s a Risk Evaluation?

According to the Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act (LCSA) amendment to the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), EPA must evaluate the safety of existing chemicals, prioritize existing chemicals for evaluation, and create risk-based chemical assessments.

The final risk evaluation is designed to thoroughly evaluate the available science before taking action to manage the risk associated with the use of a chemical.

If EPA’s final risk evaluation finds there are adverse health risks associated with MC under any of the specific conditions of use, the agency can propose Actions to address those risks within the timeframe required by TSCA. EPA’s actions could include proposed regulations to prohibit or limit the manufacture, processing, distribution in the marketplace, use, or disposal of the chemical, as applicable.

EPA & Public Scrutiny on Methylene Chloride

EPA has faced public pressure over the last few years to finalize a 2017 proposed rulemaking that would have banned commercial sales in addition to consumer sales of methylene chloride.

On March 27, 2019, EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler signed a Final Rule to prohibit the manufacture (including import), processing, and distribution of methylene chloride in all paint removers only for consumer use. The Final Rule goes into effect on November 29, 2019.

The Final Rule has since faced more scrutiny from the public. In October, public health advocates filed a lawsuit, arguing the ban must include a prohibition on commercial sales because workers are most at risk to MC exposure.

Next Steps

There will be a virtual meeting on November 12 and an in-person meeting December 3–4 to discuss the draft risk evaluation. More information can be found in the Federal Register.

EPA is also soliciting comments here on the draft risk evaluation until December 30, 2019.

In 2020: Complete EPA Regs Training in Atlanta, New Jersey, Salt Lake City, and Chicago

At the Complete Environmental Regulations Workshop, collaborate with other managers to identify the requirements that apply to your facility, ask the right questions, and make the right decisions about EPA compliance.oilrefinery_news.jpg

Managing site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERLCA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field, or need an update on changing EPA rules, online training is a convenient way to quickly build in-depth expertise.

Upcoming EPA compliance workshops:
Atlanta, GA                        Jan. 23–24
Sparta, NJ                          March 2–3
Salt Lake City, UT              March 12–13
Chicago, IL                         April 2–3
Reserve your seat now

Can’t make it to a workshop? Train online, at your own pace now.

Tags: chemical, environmental, EPA, evaluation, health, lcsa, paint, paint stripper, public, reporting, risk, safety, toxic substances control act, TSCA

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

One of the best trainings I have ever received!

Brandon Morfin

EH&S Manager

Convenient; I can train when I want, where I want.

Barry Cook

Hazmat Shipping Professional

We have a very busy work schedule and using Lion enables us to take the course at our own time. It makes it easy for me to schedule my employees' training.

Timothy Mertes

Hazmat Shipping Professional

The online course was well thought out and organized, with good interaction between the student and the course.

Larry Ybarra

Material Release Agent

I really enjoyed this training. Even after years on both sides of the comprehension coin, I find myself still learning! The quality of the delivery exceeded much of the training I have received in the past.

Neil Ozonur

Safety Officer

More thorough than a class I attended last year through another company.

Troy Yonkers

HSES Representative

Excellent course. Very interactive. Explanations are great whether you get the questions wrong or right.

Gregory Thompson

Environmental, Health & Safety Regional Manager

Very good. I have always appreciated the way Lion Tech develops, presents and provides training and materials.

John Troy

Environmental Specialist

Lion courses always set the bar for content, reference, and practical application. Membership and access to the experts is an added bonus.

John Brown, CSP

Director of Safety & Env Affairs

The training was impressive. I am not a fan of online training but this was put together very well. I would recommend Lion to others.

Donnie James

Quality Manager

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Shipping papers are a crucial part of safely shipping hazardous materials. See the top 5 mistakes shippers make on shipping papers, and how to avoid them.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.