Search

Methylene Chloride Draft TSCA Risk Evaluation Released by EPA

Posted on 11/5/2019 by Lauren Scott

On October 29, 2019, EPA unveiled a draft risk evaluation for the chemical methylene chloride (MC). This comes after a prohibition on consumer sales was enacted in March of this year to go into effect at the end of November.

The risk evaluation examines more than 70 uses of MC, including commercial paint and coating removal, consumer adhesives, sealants, degreasers, cleaners, and automobile products, to determine any hazards associated with the use of the chemical under these conditions. Under the latest TSCA amendment, MC is the fifth of the first ten chemicals prioritized to undergo risk evaluation.

View the draft risk evaluation here.

However, this is only a draft risk evaluation. A final risk evaluation is not expected for several months. No action will be taken until the final risk evaluation is released.

What’s a Risk Evaluation?

According to the Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act (LCSA) amendment to the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), EPA must evaluate the safety of existing chemicals, prioritize existing chemicals for evaluation, and create risk-based chemical assessments.

The final risk evaluation is designed to thoroughly evaluate the available science before taking action to manage the risk associated with the use of a chemical.

If EPA’s final risk evaluation finds there are adverse health risks associated with MC under any of the specific conditions of use, the agency can propose Actions to address those risks within the timeframe required by TSCA. EPA’s actions could include proposed regulations to prohibit or limit the manufacture, processing, distribution in the marketplace, use, or disposal of the chemical, as applicable.

EPA & Public Scrutiny on Methylene Chloride

EPA has faced public pressure over the last few years to finalize a 2017 proposed rulemaking that would have banned commercial sales in addition to consumer sales of methylene chloride.

On March 27, 2019, EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler signed a Final Rule to prohibit the manufacture (including import), processing, and distribution of methylene chloride in all paint removers only for consumer use. The Final Rule goes into effect on November 29, 2019.

The Final Rule has since faced more scrutiny from the public. In October, public health advocates filed a lawsuit, arguing the ban must include a prohibition on commercial sales because workers are most at risk to MC exposure.

Next Steps

There will be a virtual meeting on November 12 and an in-person meeting December 3–4 to discuss the draft risk evaluation. More information can be found in the Federal Register.

EPA is also soliciting comments here on the draft risk evaluation until December 30, 2019.

In 2020: Complete EPA Regs Training in Atlanta, New Jersey, Salt Lake City, and Chicago

At the Complete Environmental Regulations Workshop, collaborate with other managers to identify the requirements that apply to your facility, ask the right questions, and make the right decisions about EPA compliance.oilrefinery_news.jpg

Managing site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERLCA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field, or need an update on changing EPA rules, online training is a convenient way to quickly build in-depth expertise.

Upcoming EPA compliance workshops:
Atlanta, GA                        Jan. 23–24
Sparta, NJ                          March 2–3
Salt Lake City, UT              March 12–13
Chicago, IL                         April 2–3
Reserve your seat now

Can’t make it to a workshop? Train online, at your own pace now.
 

Tags: chemical, environmental, EPA, evaluation, health, lcsa, paint, paint stripper, public, reporting, risk, safety, toxic substances control act, TSCA

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

I was able to present my scenario to the instructor and worked thru the regulations together. In the past, I attended another training firm's classes. Now, I have no intention of leaving Lion!

Diana Joyner

Senior Environmental Engineer

The instructor was very patient and engaging - willing to answer and help explain subject matter.

Misty Filipp

Material Control Superintendent

The instructor does a great job at presenting material in an approachable way. I have been able to save my company about $30,000 in the last year with what I have learned from Lion!

Curtis Ahonen

EHS&S Manager

The instructor was excellent. They knew all of the material without having to read from a notepad or computer.

Gary Hartzell

Warehouse Supervisor

I will never go anywhere, but to Lion Technology.

Dawn Swofford

EHS Technician

Lion does a great job summarizing and communicating complicated EH&S-related regulations.

Michele Irmen

Sr. Environmental Engineer

The instructor made the class very enjoyable and catered to the needs of our group.

Sarah Baker

Planner

The instructor kept the class engaged and made learning fun. There was a lot of information to cover but time flew by. I will definitely use Lion in the future!

Chelsea Minguela

Hazmat Shipping Professional

More thorough than a class I attended last year through another company.

Troy Yonkers

HSES Representative

The course is well thought out and organized in a way that leads to a clearer understanding of the total training.

David Baily

Hazmat Shipping Professional

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Explore ten hazardous waste management errors that caused generators in California the most trouble last year.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.