Search

Methylene Chloride Draft TSCA Risk Evaluation Released by EPA

Posted on 11/5/2019 by Lauren Scott

On October 29, 2019, EPA unveiled a draft risk evaluation for the chemical methylene chloride (MC). This comes after a prohibition on consumer sales was enacted in March of this year to go into effect at the end of November.

The risk evaluation examines more than 70 uses of MC, including commercial paint and coating removal, consumer adhesives, sealants, degreasers, cleaners, and automobile products, to determine any hazards associated with the use of the chemical under these conditions. Under the latest TSCA amendment, MC is the fifth of the first ten chemicals prioritized to undergo risk evaluation.

View the draft risk evaluation here.

However, this is only a draft risk evaluation. A final risk evaluation is not expected for several months. No action will be taken until the final risk evaluation is released.

What’s a Risk Evaluation?

According to the Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act (LCSA) amendment to the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), EPA must evaluate the safety of existing chemicals, prioritize existing chemicals for evaluation, and create risk-based chemical assessments.

The final risk evaluation is designed to thoroughly evaluate the available science before taking action to manage the risk associated with the use of a chemical.

If EPA’s final risk evaluation finds there are adverse health risks associated with MC under any of the specific conditions of use, the agency can propose Actions to address those risks within the timeframe required by TSCA. EPA’s actions could include proposed regulations to prohibit or limit the manufacture, processing, distribution in the marketplace, use, or disposal of the chemical, as applicable.

EPA & Public Scrutiny on Methylene Chloride

EPA has faced public pressure over the last few years to finalize a 2017 proposed rulemaking that would have banned commercial sales in addition to consumer sales of methylene chloride.

On March 27, 2019, EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler signed a Final Rule to prohibit the manufacture (including import), processing, and distribution of methylene chloride in all paint removers only for consumer use. The Final Rule goes into effect on November 29, 2019.

The Final Rule has since faced more scrutiny from the public. In October, public health advocates filed a lawsuit, arguing the ban must include a prohibition on commercial sales because workers are most at risk to MC exposure.

Next Steps

There will be a virtual meeting on November 12 and an in-person meeting December 3–4 to discuss the draft risk evaluation. More information can be found in the Federal Register.

EPA is also soliciting comments here on the draft risk evaluation until December 30, 2019.

In 2020: Complete EPA Regs Training in Atlanta, New Jersey, Salt Lake City, and Chicago

At the Complete Environmental Regulations Workshop, collaborate with other managers to identify the requirements that apply to your facility, ask the right questions, and make the right decisions about EPA compliance.oilrefinery_news.jpg

Managing site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERLCA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field, or need an update on changing EPA rules, online training is a convenient way to quickly build in-depth expertise.

Upcoming EPA compliance workshops:
Atlanta, GA                        Jan. 23–24
Sparta, NJ                          March 2–3
Salt Lake City, UT              March 12–13
Chicago, IL                         April 2–3
Reserve your seat now

Can’t make it to a workshop? Train online, at your own pace now.
 

Tags: chemical, environmental, EPA, evaluation, health, lcsa, paint, paint stripper, public, reporting, risk, safety, toxic substances control act, TSCA

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

I really enjoyed this training. Even after years on both sides of the comprehension coin, I find myself still learning! The quality of the delivery exceeded much of the training I have received in the past.

Neil Ozonur

Safety Officer

This was the 1st instructor that has made the topic actually enjoyable and easy to follow and understand. Far better than the "other" training providers our company has attended!

Lori Hardy

Process & Resource Administrator

This course went above my expectations from the moment I walked in the door. The instructor led us through two days packed with useful compliance information.

Rachel Stewart

Environmental Manager

The instructor's energy, enthusiasm, and knowledge of the subject make the class a great learning experience!

Brian Martinez

Warehouse Operator

You blew the doors off the competition!

Stephen Bieschke

Facilities Manager

Lion's information is very thorough and accurate. Presenter was very good.

Melissa Little

Regulatory Manager

The exercises in the DOT hazardous materials management course are especially helpful in evaluating your understanding of course information.

Morgan Bliss

Principal Industrial Hygienist

Course instructor was better prepared and presented better than other trainers. Course manual and references were easier to use as well.

Marty Brownfield

Hazardous Waste Professional

Excellent job. Made what is very dry material interesting. Thoroughly explained all topics in easy-to-understand terms.

David Hertvik

Vice President

My experience with Lion classes has always been good. Lion Technology always covers the EPA requirements I must follow.

Steven Erlandson

Environmental Coordinator

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Explore ten hazardous waste management errors that caused generators in California the most trouble last year.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.