Available Now: 2023 Schedule of Hazmat & RCRA Training

Proposed Changes to TSCA SNUR Rules for Chemical Manufacturers

Posted on 9/26/2016 by Roger Marks

US EPA has proposed changes to the Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA) chemical reporting requirements intended in part to align the TSCA rules with OSHA’s Hazard Communication, or “HazCom,” Standard (HCS) and other best safety practices. See the text of the proposed TSCA rulemaking.

Hazard Control and PPE Under TSCA

In short, EPA proposes changing the language pertaining to respiratory protection requirements at 40 CFR 721.63 to update the references to OSHA and NIOSH work safety standards. For all SNURs issued by US EPA, manufacturers and processors may follow the updated respiratory protection standards without triggering a Significant New Use Notification (SNUN) requirement. 

In addition, EPA’s proposal would update 40 CFR 721.63 to designate as a Significant New Use the failure to implement a hierarchy of controls to protect workers. Like the OSHA requirements at 29 CFR 1910.134(a)(1), the updated TSCA rule would require employers to identify and use proper controls—substituting or eliminating the hazard, implementing engineer controls, administrative and work practice controls—before using personal protective equipment (PPE) for worker protection. 

Have questions about using PPE in the workplace? Read Is PPE Your Last Resort for Workplace Safety?

TSCA chemical regulations

Proposed Changes to TSCA

EPA plans to add paragraphs to the TSCA SNUR requirements which will:  

  • Require employers to develop and implement a written hazard communication plan as required by OSHA’s 29 CFR 1910.1200 HazCom rules, and
  • Describe hazard statements and warnings that may be required based on EPA’s risk assessment of a chemical substance
Other changes in the proposed TSCA rulemaking include:

  • Clarifying the definition of Significant New Use for ne chemicals to include the language “Use other than as described in the premanufacture notice referenced in Subpart E of this part for the substance” or more specific information about the use;
  • Clarify the meaning of the phrase “predictable or purposeful release” with respect to 40 CFR 721.90 reporting requirements; the phrase does not apply to releases where true emergency conditions exist and a SNUN is not possible;
  • Updating the bona fide procedure for Confidential Business Information (CBI) under 40 CFR 721.11;
  • Revising the requirements at 40 CFR 721.38, 720.45 and 723.50 to require Safety Data Sheets (SDS) already developed must be submitted as part of TSCA notifications (PMN, SNUN, LVE, LoREX, or TME); and
  • Fixing typographical errors, etc.
Read EPA’s full proposed rule here.

The American Coatings Association provides a useful breakdown of the  proposed TSCA rule as well, here.  

Help with TSCA Chemical Reporting

Getting ready to report your site’s chemical data for 2016? Before you do, join us for the live, instructor-led TSCA Chemical Reporting & Recordkeeping Webinar on October 20. This popular, two-hour TSCA training session covers the latest changes to the TSCA CDR requirements. Plus, learn to manage other critical TSCA reporting programs like Significant New Use Rules (SNUR), import certifications and export notifications, Premanufacture Notifications (PMN), recordkeeping for Health and Safety Data, and more.

Don’t miss the final webinar before the new TSCA reporting deadline! Learn more and sign up here.

Tags: chemical, GHS, hazard communication, reporting and recordkeeping, TSCA

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

If I need thorough training or updating, I always use Lion. Lion is always the best in both instruction and materials.

Bryce Parker

EHS Manager

This was the 1st instructor that has made the topic actually enjoyable and easy to follow and understand. Far better than the "other" training providers our company has attended!

Lori Hardy

Process & Resource Administrator

The instructor does a great job at presenting material in an approachable way. I have been able to save my company about $30,000 in the last year with what I have learned from Lion!

Curtis Ahonen

EHS&S Manager

Well designed and thorough program. Excellent summary of requirements with references. Inclusion of regulations in hard copy form, as well as full electronic with state pertinent regulations included is a great bonus!

Oscar Fisher

EHS Manager

Convenient; I can train when I want, where I want.

Barry Cook

Hazmat Shipping Professional

Given the choice, I would do all coursework this way. In-person courses go very fast without the opportunity to pause or repeat anything.

Ellen Pelton

Chemical Laboratory Manager

Excellent class, super instructor, very easy to follow. No rushing through material. Would like to take his class again.

Lawrence Patterson

EH&S Facility Maintenance & Security Manager

The instructor was probably the best I ever had! He made the class enjoyable, was humorous at times, and very knowledgeable.

Mary Sue Michon

Environmental Administrator

Lion is easily and consistently the best option for compliance training. I've learned new information from every instructor I've had.

Rachel Mathis

EHS Specialist

I love that the instructor emphasized the thought process behind the regs.

Rebecca Saxena

Corporate Product Stewardship Specialist

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Knowing why TSDFs reject loads of hazardous waste—and the exact steps to follow if it happens—can reduce your anxiety and uncertainty about rejection.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.