Search

Quick Guide: Shipping Hazmat With No Packing Group

Posted on 9/20/2016 by Lion Technology Inc.

On January 8, 2015 (80 FR 1076), in order to harmonize its rules with international standards, the US DOT Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) amended the 49 CFR Hazardous Material Regulations to remove packing group assignments for several articles.

US and international authorities removed packing group or "PG" from articles for several reasons. Before the rule change, some articles were assigned packing groups (e.g., wet batteries) and others were not (e.g., aerosols). When articles were assigned a packing group, it did not accurately reflect the degree of danger. Removing PG assignments from these articles made the HMR more consistent.


Articles No Longer Assigned Packing Groups

The January 2015 Final Rule removed PG assignments from the following articles:

UN2017  Ammunition, tear-producing, non-explosive, without burster or expelling charge, non-fuzed
UN2016  Ammunition, toxic, non-explosive, without burster or expelling charge, non-fuzed
UN3506  Mercury contained in manufactured articles
UN3356  Oxygen generator, chemical 
UN3268  Safety devices, electrically initiated
UN1700  Tear gas candles
UN3292  Batteries, containing sodium
UN2794  Batteries, wet, filled with acid, electric storage
UN2795  Batteries, wet, filled with alkali, electric storage
UN2800  Batteries, wet, non-spillable, electric storage
UN3480  Lithium ion batteries including lithium ion polymer batteries
UN3481  Lithium ion batteries contained in equipment including lithium ion polymer batteries
UN3481  Lithium ion batteries packed with equipment including lithium ion polymer batteries
UN3090  Lithium metal batteries including lithium alloy batteries
UN3091  Lithium metal batteries contained in equipment including lithium alloy batteries
UN3091  Lithium metal batteries packed with equipment including lithium alloy batteries

What Is a Packing Group (PG)?

The HMR defines packing group to mean "a grouping according to the degree of danger presented by hazardous materials in 49 CFR 171.8. The purpose of packing groups is twofold. First, PG indicates the degree of danger presented by the material compared to others in the same class or division.  
  • PG I indicates great danger
  • PG II indicates medium danger
  • PG III indicates minor danger
Second, the packing groups of hazardous materials line up with the packaging performance levels of certified UN or DOT specification packagings: 
  • X-rated packagings are strong enough to hold PG I, PG II, or PG III mateirals.
  • Y-rated packagings may be used to ship PG II or PG III materials. Not PG I. 
  • Z-rated packagings may be used for PG III materials only 


What Is a Hazmat Article?

Unfortunately for shippers, the hazmat regulations do not define the term "article." In regulatory and industry circles, a commonly-used definition comes from the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (HCS), which defines "article" to mean—
 

"a manufactured item other than a fluid or particle: (i) which is formed to a specific shape or design during manufacture; (ii) which has end use function(s) dependent in whole or in part upon its shape or design during end use; …."

[29 CFR 1910.1200(c)]

Some article may contain a regulated hazardous materials. That said, an "article" has more purpose than a container, which is why articles are treated differently. 

For example: 
 
  • A sealed glass ampule holding mercury is a container, not an article. It would be shipped as "UN 2809, Mercury, 8(6.1)" and assigned to Packing Group II

  • Put the same mercury in a long, cylindrical glass ampule, however, and draw some lines on the side to measure temperature, and now you have a thermometer, which is considered an article, and would be shipped as "UN 3506, Mercury Contained in Manufactured Articles, 8(6.1)" and no packing group assignment

What Else Doesn't Get a Packing Group?

Hazmat with no packing group is not a new idea. Gases (Class 2), infectious substances (Division 6.2), and radioactive materials (Class 7) never had packing group assignments. In other cases, like with explosives (1) or organic peroxides (5.2), the "severity of hazard" for a material is communicated in some way other than using PG I, II, or III.

Watch the video at the top of the page to learn more about how these "non-PG" hazard classes and divisions are divided up to indicate which materials are more hazardous than others. 

What Does It Mean to Not have a Packing Group?

Without a packing group, you don't automatically know what level of packaging to use for an article like you do for common industrial hazardous chemicals. However, the packing instructions and/or special provisions for articles and other materials without packing groups will always specify the type and strength of packaging to ship the articles.

Not having a packing group doesn't mean much by itself. It means that the packing group section on the shipping papers will be left blank, because there's nothing to put there. [49 CFR 172.202(a)(4)] Also, while marking the PG on the package has never been a requirement, if you do mark your packages with their contents' packing group, you risk noncompliance if packing group assignments no longer apply to your particular article or material.
 

Last Multimodal Hazmat Shipper Workshops of 2016!

The final Complete Multimodal Hazmat Shipper Workshops (49 CFR, IATA, IMDG) of 2016 are starting soon. Get up to speed with the latest rules for hazmat ground, air, and vessel shippers—including new rules for air shipments in the 58th edition IATA Dangerous Goods Regulations—when the workshops come to Kansas City on October 25-28, Detroit on October 31-November 3, Cincinnati on October 31- November 3, Pittsburgh on December 5-8, and Chicago on December 12-15.

Sign up now to keep your hazmat shipments in compliance, in 2017 and beyond!

Tags: 49 CFR, DOT hazmat, hazardous materials, hazmat in articles, packing groups

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

The course was very informative and presented in a way that was easily understood and remembered. I would recommend this course.

Jeffrey Tierno

Hazmat Shipping Professional

I used the IT support number available and my issue was resolved within a few minutes. I don't see anything that could have made it better.

Danny Province

EHS Professional

This course went above my expectations from the moment I walked in the door. The instructor led us through two days packed with useful compliance information.

Rachel Stewart

Environmental Manager

The instructor was very patient and engaging - willing to answer and help explain subject matter.

Misty Filipp

Material Control Superintendent

My experience with Lion classes has always been good. Lion Technology always covers the EPA requirements I must follow.

Steven Erlandson

Environmental Coordinator

Very good. I have always appreciated the way Lion Tech develops, presents and provides training and materials.

John Troy

Environmental Specialist

I tried other environmental training providers, but they were all sub-standard compared to Lion. I will not stray from Lion again!

Sara Sills

Environmental Specialist

Lion does a great job summarizing and communicating complicated EH&S-related regulations.

Michele Irmen

Sr. Environmental Engineer

Excellent job. Made what is very dry material interesting. Thoroughly explained all topics in easy-to-understand terms.

David Hertvik

Vice President

The instructor was very engaging and helped less experienced people understand the concepts.

Steve Gall

Safety Leader

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Decrease spill, release, and injury risk and increase savings with these "source reduction" strategies to prevent unused chemicals from becoming regulated as hazardous waste.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.