EPA Enforcement Roundup: Week of 9/8
Below are examples of recent EPA enforcement actions that provide insight into how and why EPA issues civil penalties to facilities for environmental noncompliance. Names of companies and individuals cited by EPA are withheld to protect their privacy.
WHO: A municipal utility company
An Indiana-based power company has reached an agreement with US EPA and State environmental officials to resolve alleged violations of the Clean Air Act. EPA alleges one of the company’s generating stations was emitting nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur dioxide (SO2), particulate matter (PM) and sulfuric acid mist (H2SO4) above the allowable level.
WHERE: Petersburg, IN
WHAT: Clean Air Act violations
HOW MUCH: $1.5 million plus $5.3 million in supplemental environmental projects
The energy provider has agreed to install a pollution control device known as a Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction System (SNCR) on one of the plant’s coal-fired units and upgrade its sulfuric acid mitigation system. The company will also undertake two environmental projects: one to restore and preserve some ecologically significant parcels of land near the plant, and another to mitigate the harm to the environment caused by the plant’s excess emissions over the years.
WHO: A waste disposal facility
EPA recently announced a settlement with a waste disposal company to address alleged environmental violations at the company’s commercial hazardous waste incinerator. Alleged violations include failure to manage and contain hazardous wastes; failure to comply with air emission limits; failure to comply with chemical accident prevention safety requirements; and failure to timely report use of certain toxic chemicals.
WHERE: Kimball, NE
WHAT: RCRA, Clean Air Act, and EPCRA violations
HOW MUCH: $790,000
The company has agreed to upgrade plans to classify, manage and contain the wastes incinerated at the facility as well as their fire prevention and response program and perform an environmental audit at the facility to identify and address any continuing noncompliance.
WHO: A construction materials manufacturer
During an investigation at a ready-mixed concrete supplier, EPA found the supplier alleged operated a stationary engine in violation of Clean Air Act management practices and operated its plant from at least September 2014 to June 2018 without a required Clean Air Act operating permit.
WHERE: Washington, D.C.
WHAT: Clean Air Act violations
HOW MUCH: $250,000
The concrete manufacturer has agreed to pay a $250,000 settlement to resolve the alleged violations. Since the violations were identified, the company has moved to a different location in the DC metropolitan area.
Convenient, Effective Online EHS Manager TrainingManaging site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERLCA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field or need an update on changing EPA rules, online training is a convenient way to quickly build in-depth expertise.
Check out the latest EPA compliance training options here:
Clean Air Act Regulations Online
TSCA Regulations Online
Clean Water Act & SDWA Regulations Online
Superfund and Right-to-Know Act Regulations Online
Tags: chemical accident prevention, Chemical safety, Clean Air Act, environmental fines, environmental news, environmental penalties, EPA, EPA Enforcement Roundup, EPA News, EPA violations, EPCRA, RCRA
Find a Post
You blew the doors off the competition!
No comparison. Lion has the best RCRA training ever!!
I used the IT support number available and my issue was resolved within a few minutes. I don't see anything that could have made it better.
These are the best commercial course references I have seen (10+ years). Great job!
EHS & Facility Engineer
This training broke down the regulations in an easy-to-understand manner and made them less overwhelming. I now feel I have the knowledge to make more informed decisions.
The price was reasonable, the time to complete the course was manageable, and the flexibility the online training allowed made it easy to complete.
Hazmat Shipping Professional
The instructor was very dedicated to providing a quality experience. She did her best to make sure students were really comprehending the information.
Inventory Control Specialist
Very witty instructor, made the long times sitting bearable. One of the few training courses I can say I actually enjoyed.
Senior EHS Engineer
The instructor had knowledge of regulations and understanding of real-world situations. The presentation style was engaging and fostered a positive atmosphere for information sharing.
Safety & Environmental Compliance Officer
Lion is my preferred trainer for hazmat and DOT.
Download Our Latest Whitepaper
Get to know the top 5 changes to OSHA’s revised GHS Hazard Communication Standard at 29 CFR 1910.1200 and how the updates impacts employee safety at your facility.