EPA Enforcement Roundup: Week of 9/8
Below are examples of recent EPA enforcement actions that provide insight into how and why EPA issues civil penalties to facilities for environmental noncompliance. Names of companies and individuals cited by EPA are withheld to protect their privacy.
WHO: A municipal utility company
An Indiana-based power company has reached an agreement with US EPA and State environmental officials to resolve alleged violations of the Clean Air Act. EPA alleges one of the company’s generating stations was emitting nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur dioxide (SO2), particulate matter (PM) and sulfuric acid mist (H2SO4) above the allowable level.
WHERE: Petersburg, IN
WHAT: Clean Air Act violations
HOW MUCH: $1.5 million plus $5.3 million in supplemental environmental projects
The energy provider has agreed to install a pollution control device known as a Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction System (SNCR) on one of the plant’s coal-fired units and upgrade its sulfuric acid mitigation system. The company will also undertake two environmental projects: one to restore and preserve some ecologically significant parcels of land near the plant, and another to mitigate the harm to the environment caused by the plant’s excess emissions over the years.
WHO: A waste disposal facility
EPA recently announced a settlement with a waste disposal company to address alleged environmental violations at the company’s commercial hazardous waste incinerator. Alleged violations include failure to manage and contain hazardous wastes; failure to comply with air emission limits; failure to comply with chemical accident prevention safety requirements; and failure to timely report use of certain toxic chemicals.
WHERE: Kimball, NE
WHAT: RCRA, Clean Air Act, and EPCRA violations
HOW MUCH: $790,000
The company has agreed to upgrade plans to classify, manage and contain the wastes incinerated at the facility as well as their fire prevention and response program and perform an environmental audit at the facility to identify and address any continuing noncompliance.
WHO: A construction materials manufacturer
During an investigation at a ready-mixed concrete supplier, EPA found the supplier alleged operated a stationary engine in violation of Clean Air Act management practices and operated its plant from at least September 2014 to June 2018 without a required Clean Air Act operating permit.
WHERE: Washington, D.C.
WHAT: Clean Air Act violations
HOW MUCH: $250,000
The concrete manufacturer has agreed to pay a $250,000 settlement to resolve the alleged violations. Since the violations were identified, the company has moved to a different location in the DC metropolitan area.
Convenient, Effective Online EHS Manager TrainingManaging site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERLCA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field or need an update on changing EPA rules, online training is a convenient way to quickly build in-depth expertise.
Check out the latest EPA compliance training options here:
Clean Air Act Regulations Online
TSCA Regulations Online
Clean Water Act & SDWA Regulations Online
Superfund and Right-to-Know Act Regulations Online
Tags: chemical accident prevention, Chemical safety, Clean Air Act, environmental fines, environmental news, environmental penalties, EPA, EPA Enforcement Roundup, EPA News, EPA violations, EPCRA, RCRA
Find a Post
Well designed and thorough program. Excellent summary of requirements with references. Inclusion of regulations in hard copy form, as well as full electronic with state pertinent regulations included is a great bonus!
I chose Lion's online webinar because it is simple, effective, and easily accessible.
Environmental Health & Safety Technician
This course went above my expectations from the moment I walked in the door. The instructor led us through two days packed with useful compliance information.
I was able to present my scenario to the instructor and worked thru the regulations together. In the past, I attended another training firm's classes. Now, I have no intention of leaving Lion!
Senior Environmental Engineer
We have a very busy work schedule and using Lion enables us to take the course at our own time. It makes it easy for me to schedule my employees' training.
Hazmat Shipping Professional
Lion courses always set the bar for content, reference, and practical application. Membership and access to the experts is an added bonus.
John Brown, CSP
Director of Safety & Env Affairs
Lion's training was by far the best online RCRA training I've ever taken. It was challenging and the layout was great!
Hazardous Waste Professional
Lion courses are the standard to which all other workshops should strive for!
Registered Environmental Health Specialist
Attending Lion Technology classes should be mandatory for every facility that ships or stores hazmat.
This was the 1st instructor that has made the topic actually enjoyable and easy to follow and understand. Far better than the "other" training providers our company has attended!
Process & Resource Administrator
Download Our Latest Whitepaper
Spot and correct 4 of the most common universal waste errors before they result in a notice of violation during a Federal or state inspection.