EPA Enforcement Roundup: Week of 8/10

Posted on 8/10/2020 by Lauren Scott

Every day, facilities across the US receive Notices of Violation from US EPA for alleged noncompliance with a wide variety of programs like the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts; chemical management and reporting regulations (TSCA, EPCRA, CERCLA, etc.); hazardous waste management and disposal standards (RCRA); and much more.

Below are examples of recent EPA enforcement actions that provide insight into how and why EPA issues civil penalties to facilities for environmental noncompliance. Names of companies and individuals cited by EPA are withheld to protect their privacy.

WHO: An Oahu municipality
WHERE: Wahiawa, HI
WHAT: Safe Drinking Water Act violations
HOW MUCH: $135,000

A municipality on Oahu has agreed to pay $135,000 to resolve allegations of illegally operating multiple large-capacity cesspools (LCCs). The land is owned by the Hawai‘i Department of Land and Natural Resources and was leased to the local governing body to use as a farm, restaurant, and gift shop. EPA banned LCCs in 2005 and Hawai’i has since passed legislation to phase out all existing LCCs by 2050. 

The agreement requires the local government to close the cesspool by the end of 2020.

WHO: A seafood processing company
WHERE: Eureka, CA
WHAT: Clean Water Act violations
HOW MUCH: $74,500

One of the largest seafood companies in the country is set to pay nearly $75,000 after improperly discharging wastewater into the City of Eureka’s sewer system and Humboldt Bay’s Eureka Slough, according to EPA. The violations were discovered during a 2018 inspection with the North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board and Eureka’s Public Works Department.

EPA also found alleged violations at the company’s operating facility, including wastewater from the indoor shrimp processing area bypassing the facility’s pretreatment system and a lack of adequate secondary containment in the indoor bulk chemical storage area and outdoor chemical storage area.

WHO: An industrial laundry facility
WHERE: West Springfield, MA
WHAT: Clean Air Act violations
HOW MUCH: $51,700

EPA alleges that improper operations at a facility that launders business uniforms and industrial shop towels resulted in potentially hazardous emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). According to EPA, the facility also had not implemented "reasonably available control technology" (RACT) as required by State environmental officials.

As part of an agreement with EPA, the company stopped laundering print towels on June 30, 2020 and will implement best management practices for the laundering of shop towels that contain oils and grease.

Convenient, Effective Online EHS Manager Training

Managing site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERLCA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field or need an update on changing EPA rules, online training is a convenient way to quickly build in-depth expertise.

Check out the latest EPA compliance training options here:
Clean Air Act Regulations Online
TSCA Regulations Online
Clean Water Act & SDWA Regulations Online
Superfund and Right-to-Know Act Regulations Online 

Tags: CA, CAA, California news, Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, CWA, environmental, environmental enforcement, environmental news, EPA, EPA Enforcement, EPA Enforcement Roundup, EPA News, fines, Hawaii News, Hawai'i News, HI, MA, Massachusetts news, penalties, VOC, volatile organic compounds

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

Attending Lion Technology classes should be mandatory for every facility that ships or stores hazmat.

Genell Drake

Outbound Lead

If I need thorough training or updating, I always use Lion. Lion is always the best in both instruction and materials.

Bryce Parker

EHS Manager

The instructor was very very informative, helpful, understandable and pleasant. This course answered many questions I had, being new to this industry.

Frances Mona

Shipping Manager

You blew the doors off the competition!

Stephen Bieschke

Facilities Manager

The instructor was excellent. They knew all of the material without having to read from a notepad or computer.

Gary Hartzell

Warehouse Supervisor

Course instructor was better prepared and presented better than other trainers. Course manual and references were easier to use as well.

Marty Brownfield

Hazardous Waste Professional

I can take what I learned in this workshop and apply it to everyday work and relate it to my activities.

Shane Hersh

Materials Handler

We have a very busy work schedule and using Lion enables us to take the course at our own time. It makes it easy for me to schedule my employees' training.

Timothy Mertes

Hazmat Shipping Professional

Lion's information is very thorough and accurate. Presenter was very good.

Melissa Little

Regulatory Manager

This was the 1st instructor that has made the topic actually enjoyable and easy to follow and understand. Far better than the "other" training providers our company has attended!

Lori Hardy

Process & Resource Administrator

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Find out what makes DOT hazmat training mandatory for employees who sign the hazardous waste manifest, a “dually regulated” document for tracking shipments.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.