Lion.com will be offline for scheduled maintenance on Tuesday, June 30, for about one hour starting at 5:00 PM ET. 
Search

Proposed: First Federal Limits on PFAS in Drinking Water

Posted on 3/29/2023 by Nick Waldron and Roger Marks

Update 03/29/2023

US EPA's proposed rule to establish enforceable drinking water standards for six per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) appeared in the Federal Register on March 29, 2023. 

EPA will accept public comments until May 30, 2023 and will hold a public hearing about the proposed rule on May 4, 2023. 

drinking water standards for PFAS from US EPA March 2023

The proposed rule doubles as a "preliminary regulatory determination" that, for four of the six substances—PFNA, PFHxS, PFBS, and "Gen X chemicals," limits are  EPA decided years ago that PFOA and PFOS should carry a Maximum Contaminant Level or MCL under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA).

More recently, EPA included PFAS (as a category) on its fifth Contaminant Candidate List (CCL 5), released in November 2022.

Once EPA lists a contaminant on the CCL, the agency must determine whether or not to limit the concentration of that substance in drinking water. The statutory criteria behind this "regulatory determination" include potential adverse health effects, the level and frequency of contamination, and ramifications for public water systems. 

See the proposed PFAS drinking water standards here.


(Posted 03/15/2023)

US EPA is proposing drinking water limits for six per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). The regulation would create the nation’s first-ever national limits for a widely used class of substances nicknamed “forever chemicals” because they do not break down over time.

The proposed rule would establish Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) for these PFAS:

  • PFOA (perfluorooctanoic acid), 
  • PFOS (perfluorooctane sulfonic acid), 
  • PFNA (perflouorononanoic acid), 
  • HFPO-DA or “GenX” (hexafluoroproplyene oxide dimer acid), 
  • PFHxS (perfluorohexane sulfonic acid), and
  • PFBS (perfluorobutane sulfonic acid). 

The proposed MCLs for these six PFAS as follows:  

Proposed: First Federal Limits on PFAS in Drinking Water

  • For PFOA, 4.0 parts-per-trillion 
  • For PFOS, 4.0 parts-per-trillion
  • For the other four PFAS, an MCL of 1.0*  

*The MCL of 1.0 is cumulative, based on a Hazard Index (HI) combining various risk factors.

The proposed rule also creates unenforceable health-based level of zero for PFOA and PFOS. 

About National Primary Drinking Water Regulation (NPDWR) 

The Safe Drinking Water Act authorizes US EPA to create National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (NPDWR). These regulations generally include limits on the concentration in drinking water of certain kinds of substances—microorganisms, organic and inorganic chemicals, disinfectants, and radionuclides. 

Public water systems or PWS (defined in 40 CFR 141.3) must notify customers via specified means whenever they detect a violation of a NPDWR. 

testing water for PFAS

WebinarComplete Environmental Regulations Training

Join a Lion instructor for the next Complete Environmental Regulations Webinar on May 18–19. Get an overview of US EPA’s major air, water, and chemical programs—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to EPCRA, TSCA, Superfund, and more.

Prefer to train right now, at your own pace? Try the interactive online course.

Tags: drinking water, PFAS

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

I have been to other training companies, but Lion’s material is much better and easier to understand.

Mark Abell

Regional Manager

Lion is at the top of the industry in compliance training. Course content and structure are updated frequently to make annual re-training enjoyable. I like that Lion has experts that I can contact for 1 year after the training.

Caroline Froning

Plant Chemist

Attending Lion Technology classes should be mandatory for every facility that ships or stores hazmat.

Genell Drake

Outbound Lead

I will never go anywhere, but to Lion Technology.

Dawn Swofford

EHS Technician

Very witty instructor, made the long times sitting bearable. One of the few training courses I can say I actually enjoyed.

John Hutchinson

Senior EHS Engineer

The course was very well structured and covered the material in a clear, concise manner.

Ian Martinez

Hazmat Shipping Professional

I really enjoyed this training. Even after years on both sides of the comprehension coin, I find myself still learning! The quality of the delivery exceeded much of the training I have received in the past.

Neil Ozonur

Safety Officer

My experience with Lion classes has always been good. Lion Technology always covers the EPA requirements I must follow.

Steven Erlandson

Environmental Coordinator

No comparison. Lion has the best RCRA training ever!!

Matt Sabine

Environmental Specialist

Convenient; I can train when I want, where I want.

Barry Cook

Hazmat Shipping Professional

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Start with these fundamentals to simplify hazardous materials shipping compliance.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.