Search

Proposed: First Federal Limits on PFAS in Drinking Water

Posted on 3/29/2023 by Nick Waldron and Roger Marks

Update 03/29/2023

US EPA's proposed rule to establish enforceable drinking water standards for six per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) appeared in the Federal Register on March 29, 2023. 

EPA will accept public comments until May 30, 2023 and will hold a public hearing about the proposed rule on May 4, 2023. 

drinking water standards for PFAS from US EPA March 2023

The proposed rule doubles as a "preliminary regulatory determination" that, for four of the six substances—PFNA, PFHxS, PFBS, and "Gen X chemicals," limits are  EPA decided years ago that PFOA and PFOS should carry a Maximum Contaminant Level or MCL under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA).

More recently, EPA included PFAS (as a category) on its fifth Contaminant Candidate List (CCL 5), released in November 2022.

Once EPA lists a contaminant on the CCL, the agency must determine whether or not to limit the concentration of that substance in drinking water. The statutory criteria behind this "regulatory determination" include potential adverse health effects, the level and frequency of contamination, and ramifications for public water systems. 

See the proposed PFAS drinking water standards here.


(Posted 03/15/2023)

US EPA is proposing drinking water limits for six per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). The regulation would create the nation’s first-ever national limits for a widely used class of substances nicknamed “forever chemicals” because they do not break down over time.

The proposed rule would establish Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) for these PFAS:

  • PFOA (perfluorooctanoic acid), 
  • PFOS (perfluorooctane sulfonic acid), 
  • PFNA (perflouorononanoic acid), 
  • HFPO-DA or “GenX” (hexafluoroproplyene oxide dimer acid), 
  • PFHxS (perfluorohexane sulfonic acid), and
  • PFBS (perfluorobutane sulfonic acid). 

The proposed MCLs for these six PFAS as follows:  

Proposed: First Federal Limits on PFAS in Drinking Water

  • For PFOA, 4.0 parts-per-trillion 
  • For PFOS, 4.0 parts-per-trillion
  • For the other four PFAS, an MCL of 1.0*  

*The MCL of 1.0 is cumulative, based on a Hazard Index (HI) combining various risk factors.

The proposed rule also creates unenforceable health-based level of zero for PFOA and PFOS. 

About National Primary Drinking Water Regulation (NPDWR) 

The Safe Drinking Water Act authorizes US EPA to create National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (NPDWR). These regulations generally include limits on the concentration in drinking water of certain kinds of substances—microorganisms, organic and inorganic chemicals, disinfectants, and radionuclides. 

Public water systems or PWS (defined in 40 CFR 141.3) must notify customers via specified means whenever they detect a violation of a NPDWR. 

testing water for PFAS

WebinarComplete Environmental Regulations Training

Join a Lion instructor for the next Complete Environmental Regulations Webinar on May 18–19. Get an overview of US EPA’s major air, water, and chemical programs—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to EPCRA, TSCA, Superfund, and more.

Prefer to train right now, at your own pace? Try the interactive online course.

Tags: drinking water, PFAS

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

Lion was very responsive to my initial questions and the website was user friendly.

Michael Britt

Supply Chain Director

We have a very busy work schedule and using Lion enables us to take the course at our own time. It makes it easy for me to schedule my employees' training.

Timothy Mertes

Hazmat Shipping Professional

This was the 1st instructor that has made the topic actually enjoyable and easy to follow and understand. Far better than the "other" training providers our company has attended!

Lori Hardy

Process & Resource Administrator

I really enjoyed this training. Even after years on both sides of the comprehension coin, I find myself still learning! The quality of the delivery exceeded much of the training I have received in the past.

Neil Ozonur

Safety Officer

The instructor was probably the best I ever had! He made the class enjoyable, was humorous at times, and very knowledgeable.

Mary Sue Michon

Environmental Administrator

The instructor was very very informative, helpful, understandable and pleasant. This course answered many questions I had, being new to this industry.

Frances Mona

Shipping Manager

I love that the instructor emphasized the thought process behind the regs.

Rebecca Saxena

Corporate Product Stewardship Specialist

The online course was well thought out and organized, with good interaction between the student and the course.

Larry Ybarra

Material Release Agent

I had a positive experience utilizing this educational program. It was very informative, convenient, and rewarding from a career perspective.

John Gratacos

Logistics Manager

This training broke down the regulations in an easy-to-understand manner and made them less overwhelming. I now feel I have the knowledge to make more informed decisions.

Amanda Oswald

Shipping Professional

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Find out what makes DOT hazmat training mandatory for employees who sign the hazardous waste manifest, a “dually regulated” document for tracking shipments.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.