Lion.com will be offline from 5 PM to 6 PM ET on Friday, February 27, for planned updates. Online training support is available via support@lion.com.
Search

Proposed: First Federal Limits on PFAS in Drinking Water

Posted on 3/29/2023 by Nick Waldron and Roger Marks

Update 03/29/2023

US EPA's proposed rule to establish enforceable drinking water standards for six per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) appeared in the Federal Register on March 29, 2023. 

EPA will accept public comments until May 30, 2023 and will hold a public hearing about the proposed rule on May 4, 2023. 

drinking water standards for PFAS from US EPA March 2023

The proposed rule doubles as a "preliminary regulatory determination" that, for four of the six substances—PFNA, PFHxS, PFBS, and "Gen X chemicals," limits are  EPA decided years ago that PFOA and PFOS should carry a Maximum Contaminant Level or MCL under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA).

More recently, EPA included PFAS (as a category) on its fifth Contaminant Candidate List (CCL 5), released in November 2022.

Once EPA lists a contaminant on the CCL, the agency must determine whether or not to limit the concentration of that substance in drinking water. The statutory criteria behind this "regulatory determination" include potential adverse health effects, the level and frequency of contamination, and ramifications for public water systems. 

See the proposed PFAS drinking water standards here.


(Posted 03/15/2023)

US EPA is proposing drinking water limits for six per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). The regulation would create the nation’s first-ever national limits for a widely used class of substances nicknamed “forever chemicals” because they do not break down over time.

The proposed rule would establish Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) for these PFAS:

  • PFOA (perfluorooctanoic acid), 
  • PFOS (perfluorooctane sulfonic acid), 
  • PFNA (perflouorononanoic acid), 
  • HFPO-DA or “GenX” (hexafluoroproplyene oxide dimer acid), 
  • PFHxS (perfluorohexane sulfonic acid), and
  • PFBS (perfluorobutane sulfonic acid). 

The proposed MCLs for these six PFAS as follows:  

Proposed: First Federal Limits on PFAS in Drinking Water

  • For PFOA, 4.0 parts-per-trillion 
  • For PFOS, 4.0 parts-per-trillion
  • For the other four PFAS, an MCL of 1.0*  

*The MCL of 1.0 is cumulative, based on a Hazard Index (HI) combining various risk factors.

The proposed rule also creates unenforceable health-based level of zero for PFOA and PFOS. 

About National Primary Drinking Water Regulation (NPDWR) 

The Safe Drinking Water Act authorizes US EPA to create National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (NPDWR). These regulations generally include limits on the concentration in drinking water of certain kinds of substances—microorganisms, organic and inorganic chemicals, disinfectants, and radionuclides. 

Public water systems or PWS (defined in 40 CFR 141.3) must notify customers via specified means whenever they detect a violation of a NPDWR. 

testing water for PFAS

WebinarComplete Environmental Regulations Training

Join a Lion instructor for the next Complete Environmental Regulations Webinar on May 18–19. Get an overview of US EPA’s major air, water, and chemical programs—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to EPCRA, TSCA, Superfund, and more.

Prefer to train right now, at your own pace? Try the interactive online course.

Tags: drinking water, PFAS

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

I really enjoy your workshops. Thank you for such a great program and all the help Lion has provided me over the years!

George Chatman

Hazardous Material Pharmacy Technician

Much better than my previous class with another company. The Lion instructor made sense, kept me awake and made me laugh!

Marti Severs

Enterprise Safety Manager

Given the choice, I would do all coursework this way. In-person courses go very fast without the opportunity to pause or repeat anything.

Ellen Pelton

Chemical Laboratory Manager

Lion was very extensive. There was a lot of things that were covered that were actually pertaining to what I do and work with. Great Job. I will be coming back in three years!

Tony Petrik

Hazmat Shipping Professional

I love that the instructor emphasized the thought process behind the regs.

Rebecca Saxena

Corporate Product Stewardship Specialist

The course was very well structured and covered the material in a clear, concise manner.

Ian Martinez

Hazmat Shipping Professional

I used the IT support number available and my issue was resolved within a few minutes. I don't see anything that could have made it better.

Danny Province

EHS Professional

Course instructor was better prepared and presented better than other trainers. Course manual and references were easier to use as well.

Marty Brownfield

Hazardous Waste Professional

Excellent course. Very interactive. Explanations are great whether you get the questions wrong or right.

Gregory Thompson

Environmental, Health & Safety Regional Manager

The exercises in the DOT hazardous materials management course are especially helpful in evaluating your understanding of course information.

Morgan Bliss

Principal Industrial Hygienist

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Look beyond the annual "Top 10 List" to see specifics about the most cited OSHA health & safety Standards and the individual regulations that tripped up employers the most last year. 

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.