FRA Withdraws Hazmat Train Staffing Rule
The Federal Rail Administration (FRA) announced on May 29, 2019 the withdrawal of a proposed rule to set minimum train staffing requirements for certain rail operations, including trains hauling large quantities of hazardous materials.
The proposed rule would have set a minimum of two train crewmembers for all freight and passenger operations, and specified roles and responsibilities for the second crewmember during movement. The proposal included exceptions for low risk operations.
The rule was proposed in 2016 amidst skyrocketing crude oil production and following a rash of crude oil incidents, including the 2013 derailment and spill in Lac-Mégantic, Quebec that killed forty-seven people and resulted in extensive property damage.
Ship hazardous materials by rail? Learn the additional, modal-specific requirements you must know to offer or accept hazmat rail shipments, and meet DOT’s function-specific training mandate for hazmat employees, with the Hazmat Ground Shipper—Additional Rail Requirements Online Course.
The train staffing rule was one of many measures taken by FRA and the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) to control the risk posed by high-hazard flammable trains, or HHFTs. HHFTS are trains hauling large volumes of hazardous materials, either in consecutive rail cars or across the whole train.
US DOT and Transport Canada collaborated on a rulemaking in 2015 to improve the safety of Class 3 flammable liquids shipped by rail. In addition, new requirements for railroad comprehensive oil spill response plans (COSRPs) and emergency preparedness, for example, took effect on April 1 this year.
In September 2018, PHMSA removed a requirement for high hazard flammable trains (HHFTs) to be equipped with electronically controlled pneumatic brake systems (ECP brake systems).
When they proposed the train staffing rule, FRA stated that “this rule would break even with its estimated costs if it prevents one fatal injury or high-consequence accident in the first 10 years of the rule.” FRA listed potential benefits that included improved post-accident /incident emergency response and management, safety and compliance enhancements, and potential avoidance of high-consequence accidents.
Catch the Complete Multimodal Hazmat Shipper Workshops near you this summer:
Parsippany, NJ July 8—11
Hartford, CT July 15—18
Atlanta, GA July 30—Aug. 2
Nashville, TN Aug. 5—8
Jacksonville, FL Aug. 13—16
Plus, catch 49 CFR and/or IATA DGR training for hazmat ground and air shippers in Boston, Philadelphia, Williamsburg, Baltimore, Charlotte, and Orlando throughout July.
The proposed rule would have set a minimum of two train crewmembers for all freight and passenger operations, and specified roles and responsibilities for the second crewmember during movement. The proposal included exceptions for low risk operations.
The rule was proposed in 2016 amidst skyrocketing crude oil production and following a rash of crude oil incidents, including the 2013 derailment and spill in Lac-Mégantic, Quebec that killed forty-seven people and resulted in extensive property damage.
Ship hazardous materials by rail? Learn the additional, modal-specific requirements you must know to offer or accept hazmat rail shipments, and meet DOT’s function-specific training mandate for hazmat employees, with the Hazmat Ground Shipper—Additional Rail Requirements Online Course.
Other Crude Oil Hazmat Rulemakings
Read the original NRPM here.The train staffing rule was one of many measures taken by FRA and the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) to control the risk posed by high-hazard flammable trains, or HHFTs. HHFTS are trains hauling large volumes of hazardous materials, either in consecutive rail cars or across the whole train.
US DOT and Transport Canada collaborated on a rulemaking in 2015 to improve the safety of Class 3 flammable liquids shipped by rail. In addition, new requirements for railroad comprehensive oil spill response plans (COSRPs) and emergency preparedness, for example, took effect on April 1 this year.
In September 2018, PHMSA removed a requirement for high hazard flammable trains (HHFTs) to be equipped with electronically controlled pneumatic brake systems (ECP brake systems).
When they proposed the train staffing rule, FRA stated that “this rule would break even with its estimated costs if it prevents one fatal injury or high-consequence accident in the first 10 years of the rule.” FRA listed potential benefits that included improved post-accident /incident emergency response and management, safety and compliance enhancements, and potential avoidance of high-consequence accidents.
Nationwide Hazmat Training in Summer 2019
Join expert Lion instructors in cities nationwide for engaging, comprehensive hazardous materials training to help you simplify your responsibilities and maintain compliance with 49 CFR, the IATA DGR, and the IMDG Code.Catch the Complete Multimodal Hazmat Shipper Workshops near you this summer:
Parsippany, NJ July 8—11
Hartford, CT July 15—18
Atlanta, GA July 30—Aug. 2
Nashville, TN Aug. 5—8
Jacksonville, FL Aug. 13—16
Plus, catch 49 CFR and/or IATA DGR training for hazmat ground and air shippers in Boston, Philadelphia, Williamsburg, Baltimore, Charlotte, and Orlando throughout July.
Tags: Federal Rail Administration, FRA, hazmat, PHMSA, Rail, train
Find a Post
Recent Posts
Compliance Archives
Download Our Latest Whitepaper
Find out what makes DOT hazmat training mandatory for employees who sign the hazardous waste manifest, a “dually regulated” document for tracking shipments.
By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.